我是这样处理双重创造问题的，忽略了第一个事件:

Private WithEvents fsw As New System.IO.FileSystemWatcher
Private complete As New List(Of String)

Private Sub fsw_Created(ByVal sender As Object, _
    ByVal e As System.IO.FileSystemEventArgs) Handles fsw.Created

    If Not complete.Contains(e.FullPath) Then
        complete.Add(e.FullPath)

    Else
        complete.Remove(e.FullPath)
        Dim th As New Threading.Thread(AddressOf hprocess)
        th.Start(e)

    End If

End Sub

我花了大量时间使用FileSystemWatcher，这里的一些方法将不起作用。我真的很喜欢禁用事件的方法，但不幸的是，它不工作，如果有>1文件被丢弃，第二个文件将错过大多数，如果不是所有的时间。 所以我使用以下方法:

private void EventCallback(object sender, FileSystemEventArgs e)
{
    var fileName = e.FullPath;

    if (!File.Exists(fileName))
    {
        // We've dealt with the file, this is just supressing further events.
        return;
    }

    // File exists, so move it to a working directory. 
    File.Move(fileName, [working directory]);

    // Kick-off whatever processing is required.
}

好吧，这是我如何只引发一个事件的解决方案:

FileSystemWatcheк watcher = new FileSystemWatcher();

//'path' - path to the file that has been modified.
watcher.Changed += (s, e) => FileChanged(path);

这里是FileChanged实现

//count is our counter to triger when we can raise and when not.
private int count = 0;
private void FileChanged(string path)
{
   if (count % 2 == 0)
     {
       //code here
     }

     count ++;
}

以下是我的方法:

// Consider having a List<String> named _changedFiles

private void OnChanged(object source, FileSystemEventArgs e)
{
    lock (_changedFiles)
    {
        if (_changedFiles.Contains(e.FullPath))
        {
            return;
        }
        _changedFiles.Add(e.FullPath);
    }

    // do your stuff

    System.Timers.Timer timer = new Timer(1000) { AutoReset = false };
    timer.Elapsed += (timerElapsedSender, timerElapsedArgs) =>
    {
        lock (_changedFiles)
        {
            _changedFiles.Remove(e.FullPath);
        }
    };
   timer.Start();
}

这是我在一个项目中用来解决这个问题的解决方案，在该项目中，我将文件作为附件发送到邮件中。 它可以很容易地避免两次触发事件，即使是一个较小的定时器间隔，但在我的情况下，1000是可以的，因为我更喜欢错过一些变化，而不是每秒用> 1条消息淹没邮箱。 至少在同时更改多个文件的情况下，它可以正常工作。

Another solution I've thought of would be to replace the list with a dictionary mapping files to their respective MD5, so you wouldn't have to choose an arbitrary interval since you wouldn't have to delete the entry but update its value, and cancel your stuff if it hasn't changed. It has the downside of having a Dictionary growing in memory as files are monitored and eating more and more memory, but I've read somewhere that the amount of files monitored depends on the FSW's internal buffer, so maybe not that critical. Dunno how MD5 computing time would affect your code's performances either, careful =\

试试下面的代码:

class WatchPlotDirectory
{
    bool let = false;
    FileSystemWatcher watcher;
    string path = "C:/Users/jamie/OneDrive/Pictures/Screenshots";

    public WatchPlotDirectory()
    {
        watcher = new FileSystemWatcher();
        watcher.Path = path;
        watcher.NotifyFilter = NotifyFilters.LastAccess | NotifyFilters.LastWrite
                               | NotifyFilters.FileName | NotifyFilters.DirectoryName;
        watcher.Filter = "*.*";
        watcher.Changed += new FileSystemEventHandler(OnChanged);
        watcher.Renamed += new RenamedEventHandler(OnRenamed);
        watcher.EnableRaisingEvents = true;
    }



    void OnChanged(object sender, FileSystemEventArgs e)
    {
        if (let==false) {
            string mgs = string.Format("File {0} | {1}",
                                       e.FullPath, e.ChangeType);
            Console.WriteLine("onchange: " + mgs);
            let = true;
        }

        else
        {
            let = false;
        }


    }

    void OnRenamed(object sender, RenamedEventArgs e)
    {
        string log = string.Format("{0} | Renamed from {1}",
                                   e.FullPath, e.OldName);
        Console.WriteLine("onrenamed: " + log);

    }

    public void setPath(string path)
    {
        this.path = path;
    }
}

这已经很晚了，但我最近遇到了这个问题，然后我想发表我的一点贡献。

首先，许多建议的解决方案都适用于单个更新的文件，而我需要在较短的时间内(几十毫秒)收到关于2-3个更改文件的通知，而重复时间相对较长(几十秒到几分钟)。

早期建议的最有趣的链接之一是FileSystemWatcher is a Bit Broken。然而，所提出的解决方案只是部分工作，正如同一作者在。net MemoryCache Expiration Demystified的不稳定行为中指出的那样，即使在20秒后也会发出通知。

然后我所做的是基于类似的原则设计一个愚蠢的替代解决方案，没有MemoryCache。

基本上，它创建了一个List<>的项目，其中有一个Key，它是文件的完整路径和一个过期计时器。如果另一个事件再次触发该更改，则在列表中找到该元素，计时器将更新为新的过期时间。 根据经验，过期时间足够长，足以在单个OnStableChange通知中收集多个事件，而不会太长，以至于感觉没有响应。

当你实例化Whatever时，你也将它链接到一个目录和一个非常基本的外部回调。

没有什么是真正优化的，我只是在几行中寻找一个解决方案。

我把它发表在这里

对我来说，这样你就可以在另一个应用程序上验证 某个更聪明、更有经验的人可以改进它，并帮助我了解它的不足之处

    internal class Whatever
    {
        private FileSystemWatcher? watcher = null;

        public delegate void DelegateFileChange(string path);
        public DelegateFileChange? onChange;

        private const int CacheTimeMilliseconds = 200;

        private class ChangeItem
        {
            public delegate void DelegateChangeItem(string key);
            public string Key { get; set; } = "";
            public System.Timers.Timer Expiration = new();
            public DelegateChangeItem? SignalChanged = null;
        }
        private class ChangeCache
        {
            private readonly List<ChangeItem> _changes = new();

            public void Set(string key, int milliSecs, ChangeItem.DelegateChangeItem? signal = null)
            {
                lock (_changes)
                {
                    ChangeItem? existing = _changes.Find(item => item.Key == key);
                    if (existing != null)
                    {
                        existing.Expiration.Interval = milliSecs;
                        existing.SignalChanged = signal;
                    }
                    else
                    {
                        ChangeItem change = new()
                        {
                            Key = key,
                            SignalChanged = signal
                        };
                        change.Expiration.Interval = milliSecs;
                        change.Expiration.AutoReset = false;
                        change.Expiration.Elapsed += delegate { Change_Elapsed(key); };
                        change.Expiration.Enabled = true;
                        _changes.Add(change);
                    }
                }
            }

            private void Change_Elapsed(string key)
            {
                lock (_changes)
                {
                    ChangeItem? existing = _changes.Find(item => item.Key == key);
                    existing?.SignalChanged?.Invoke(key);
                    _changes.RemoveAll(item => item.Key == key);
                }
            }
        }

        private ChangeCache changeCache = new();

        public bool Link(string directory, DelegateFileChange? fileChange = null)
        {
            bool result = false;

            try
            {
                if (Directory.Exists(directory))
                {
                    watcher = new FileSystemWatcher(directory);
                    watcher.NotifyFilter = NotifyFilters.LastWrite;
                    watcher.Changed += Watcher_Changed;

                    onChange = fileChange;

                    watcher.Filter = "*.*";
                    watcher.IncludeSubdirectories = true;
                    watcher.EnableRaisingEvents = true;

                    result = true;
                }
            }
            catch (Exception)
            {
            }

            return result;
        }

        private void OnStableChange(string path)
        {
            if (File.Exists(path))
            {
                onChange?.Invoke(path);
            }
        }

        public void Watcher_Changed(object sender, FileSystemEventArgs e)
        {
            changeCache.Set(e.FullPath, CacheTimeMilliseconds, OnStableChange);
        }
    }