函数运行() { var foo = “Foo”; let bar = “Bar”; console.log(foo, bar); // Foo Bar { var Moo = “Mooo” let baz = “Bazz”; console.log(moo, baz); // Mooo Bazz } console.log(moo); // Mooo console.log(baz); // ReferenceError } run();

為什麼讓關鍵字被引入到語言是功能範圍是混亂的原因,是JavaScript的主要錯誤來源之一。

创建全球对象财产

在最高层次上,让我们不同于VAR,不会在全球对象上创造任何财产:

var foo = “Foo”; // 全球推翻的Let bar = “Bar”; // 不允许全球推翻的console.log(window.foo); // Foo console.log(window.bar); // undefined

此分類上一篇: <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.min.js"></script> <p> 點擊每個數字將登錄到主機:</p> <div id="div1">1</div> <div id="div2">2</div> <div id="div3">3</div> <div id="div4">4</div> <div id="div5">5</div>

每个单点处理器都会提到相同的对象,因为只有一个对象对象持有6个,所以你每次点击获得6个。

一个通用工作是将此插入一个匿名功能,并将它作为一个论点。 这种问题现在也可以通过使用,而不是在下面的代码中显示的变化来避免。

msg = “Hello World” 函数 doWork() { // msg 将是可用的,因为它被定义在这个开幕式上! 让朋友 = 0; console.log(msg); // 与 VAR 虽然: for (var iCount2 = 0; iCount2 < 5; iCount2++) {} // iCount2 将在这个开幕式后可用! console.log(iCount2); for (let iCount1 = 0; iCount1 < 5; iCount1++) {} // iCount1 将没有

下面是两者之间的区别的例子:

正如你可以看到的那样, var j 变量仍然在 loop 范围之外有一个值(区块范围),但 let i 变量在 loop 范围之外是不确定的。

“使用严格”; console.log(“var:”); for (var j = 0; j < 2; j++) { console.log(j); } console.log(j); console.log(“let:”); for (let i = 0; i < 2; i++) { console.log(i); } console.log(i);

显然,至少在Visual Studio 2015中,TypeScript 1.5,“var”允许一个区块中的相同变量名称的多个声明,而“Let”不。

这不会导致编译错误:

var x = 1;
var x = 2;

这将是:

let x = 1;
let x = 2;

使用 var 声明定义的变量在其定义的整个函数中已知,从函数的开始。 (*) 使用 let 声明定义的变量仅在其定义的区块中已知,从其定义的时刻开始。

// i IS NOT known here
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, but undefined
// l IS NOT known here

function loop(arr) {
    // i IS known here, but undefined
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
    // l IS NOT known here

    for( var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++ ) {
        // i IS known here, and has a value
        // j IS NOT known here
        // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
        // l IS NOT known here
    };

    // i IS known here, and has a value
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
    // l IS NOT known here

    for( let j = 0; j < arr.length; j++ ) {
        // i IS known here, and has a value
        // j IS known here, and has a value
        // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
        // l IS NOT known here
    };

    // i IS known here, and has a value
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
    // l IS NOT known here
}

loop([1,2,3,4]);

for( var k = 0; k < arr.length; k++ ) {
    // i IS NOT known here
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, and has a value
    // l IS NOT known here
};

for( let l = 0; l < arr.length; l++ ) {
    // i IS NOT known here
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, and has a value
    // l IS known here, and has a value
};

loop([1,2,3,4]);

// i IS NOT known here
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, and has a value
// l IS NOT known here

今天使用安全吗?

有些人会说,在未来,我们只会使用让陈述,而这些陈述会变得过时。JavaScript老师Kyle Simpson写了一篇非常复杂的文章,他认为为什么不会这样。

事实上,我们实际上需要问自己是否安全使用放弃声明,这个问题的答案取决于你的环境:

此分類上一篇

如何跟踪浏览器支持