伪代码基于@biziclop的答案:

只使用基本结构:变量、数组、if、while和for 函数getNode(id)和getChildren(id) 假设已知节点数N

注意:我从1开始使用数组索引，而不是0。

广度优先

S = Array(N)
S[1] = 1; // root id
cur = 1;
last = 1
while cur <= last
    id = S[cur]
    node = getNode(id)
    children = getChildren(id)

    n = length(children)
    for i = 1..n
        S[ last+i ] = children[i]
    end
    last = last+n
    cur = cur+1

    visit(node)
end

深度优先

S = Array(N)
S[1] = 1; // root id
cur = 1;
while cur > 0
    id = S[cur]
    node = getNode(id)
    children = getChildren(id)

    n = length(children)
    for i = 1..n
        // assuming children are given left-to-right
        S[ cur+i-1 ] = children[ n-i+1 ] 

        // otherwise
        // S[ cur+i-1 ] = children[i] 
    end
    cur = cur+n-1

    visit(node)
end

虽然“使用堆栈”可能是人为的面试问题的答案，但实际上，它只是显式地做递归程序在幕后所做的事情。

递归使用程序内置堆栈。当你调用一个函数时，它将函数的参数推入堆栈，当函数返回时，它通过弹出程序堆栈来执行。

假设您希望在访问图中的每个节点时执行通知。简单的递归实现是:

void DFSRecursive(Node n, Set<Node> visited) {
  visited.add(n);
  for (Node x : neighbors_of(n)) {  // iterate over all neighbors
    if (!visited.contains(x)) {
      DFSRecursive(x, visited);
    }
  }
  OnVisit(n);  // callback to say node is finally visited, after all its non-visited neighbors
}

好的，现在你需要一个基于堆栈的实现，因为你的例子不起作用。例如，复杂的图形可能会导致程序的堆栈崩溃，您需要实现一个非递归版本。最大的问题是知道何时发出通知。

下面的伪代码可以工作(为了可读性，Java和c++混合使用):

void DFS(Node root) {
  Set<Node> visited;
  Set<Node> toNotify;  // nodes we want to notify

  Stack<Node> stack;
  stack.add(root);
  toNotify.add(root);  // we won't pop nodes from this until DFS is done
  while (!stack.empty()) {
    Node current = stack.pop();
    visited.add(current);
    for (Node x : neighbors_of(current)) {
      if (!visited.contains(x)) {
        stack.add(x);
        toNotify.add(x);
      }
    }
  }
  // Now issue notifications. toNotifyStack might contain duplicates (will never
  // happen in a tree but easily happens in a graph)
  Set<Node> notified;
  while (!toNotify.empty()) {
  Node n = toNotify.pop();
  if (!toNotify.contains(n)) {
    OnVisit(n);  // issue callback
    toNotify.add(n);
  }
}

它看起来很复杂，但发出通知所需的额外逻辑存在，因为您需要以相反的访问顺序通知- DFS从根开始，但在最后通知它，不像BFS实现非常简单。

看看下面的图表: 节点是s t v w。 有向边为: S ->t, S ->v, t->w, v->w, v->t。 运行你自己的DFS实现，访问节点的顺序必须是: W t v s 一个笨拙的DFS实现可能会首先通知t，这表明存在错误。DFS的递归实现总是最后到达w。

使用ES6生成器的非递归DFS

class Node {
  constructor(name, childNodes) {
    this.name = name;
    this.childNodes = childNodes;
    this.visited = false;
  }
}

function *dfs(s) {
  let stack = [];
  stack.push(s);
  stackLoop: while (stack.length) {
    let u = stack[stack.length - 1]; // peek
    if (!u.visited) {
      u.visited = true; // grey - visited
      yield u;
    }

    for (let v of u.childNodes) {
      if (!v.visited) {
        stack.push(v);
        continue stackLoop;
      }
    }

    stack.pop(); // black - all reachable descendants were processed 
  }    
}

它与典型的非递归DFS不同，可以很容易地检测给定节点的所有可达后代何时被处理，并维护列表/堆栈中的当前路径。

基于biziclops的ES6实现很棒的答案:

root = { text: "root", children: [{ text: "c1", children: [{ text: "c11" }, { text: "c12" }] }, { text: "c2", children: [{ text: "c21" }, { text: "c22" }] }, ] } console.log("DFS:") DFS(root, node => node.children, node => console.log(node.text)); console.log("BFS:") BFS(root, node => node.children, node => console.log(node.text)); function BFS(root, getChildren, visit) { let nodesToVisit = [root]; while (nodesToVisit.length > 0) { const currentNode = nodesToVisit.shift(); nodesToVisit = [ ...nodesToVisit, ...(getChildren(currentNode) || []), ]; visit(currentNode); } } function DFS(root, getChildren, visit) { let nodesToVisit = [root]; while (nodesToVisit.length > 0) { const currentNode = nodesToVisit.shift(); nodesToVisit = [ ...(getChildren(currentNode) || []), ...nodesToVisit, ]; visit(currentNode); } }

Java中的DFS迭代:

//DFS: Iterative
private Boolean DFSIterative(Node root, int target) {
    if (root == null)
        return false;
    Stack<Node> _stack = new Stack<Node>();
    _stack.push(root);
    while (_stack.size() > 0) {
        Node temp = _stack.peek();
        if (temp.data == target)
            return true;
        if (temp.left != null)
            _stack.push(temp.left);
        else if (temp.right != null)
            _stack.push(temp.right);
        else
            _stack.pop();
    }
    return false;
}