我想做一些事情,比如:

MyObject myObj = GetMyObj(); // Create and fill a new object
MyObject newObj = myObj.Clone();

然后对未反映在原始对象中的新对象进行更改。

我通常不需要这个功能,所以当有必要时,我会创建一个新对象,然后单独复制每个属性,但这总是让我觉得有更好或更优雅的方法来处理这种情况。

如何克隆或深度复制对象,以便在原始对象中不反映任何更改的情况下修改克隆的对象?


当前回答

我对当前的答案做了一些基准测试,发现了一些有趣的事实。

使用BinarySerializer=>https://stackoverflow.com/a/78612/6338072

使用XmlSerializer=>https://stackoverflow.com/a/50150204/6338072

使用Activator.CreateInstance=>https://stackoverflow.com/a/56691124/6338072

这些是结果

BenchmarkDotNet=v0.13.1, OS=Windows 10.0.18363.1734 (1909/November2019Update/19H2)

Intel Core i5-6200U CPU 2.30GHz(Skylake),1个CPU,4个逻辑核和2个物理核[主机]:.NET Framework 4.8(4.8.4400.0),X86 LegacyJIT默认作业:.NET Framework 4.8(4.8.4400.0),X86 LegacyJIT

Method Mean Error StdDev Gen 0 Allocated
BinarySerializer 220.69 us 4.374 us 9.963 us 49.8047 77 KB
XmlSerializer 182.72 us 3.619 us 9.405 us 21.9727 34 KB
Activator.CreateInstance 49.99 us 0.992 us 2.861 us 1.9531 3 KB

其他回答

下面是一个深度拷贝实现:

public static object CloneObject(object opSource)
{
    //grab the type and create a new instance of that type
    Type opSourceType = opSource.GetType();
    object opTarget = CreateInstanceOfType(opSourceType);

    //grab the properties
    PropertyInfo[] opPropertyInfo = opSourceType.GetProperties(BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.NonPublic | BindingFlags.Instance);

    //iterate over the properties and if it has a 'set' method assign it from the source TO the target
    foreach (PropertyInfo item in opPropertyInfo)
    {
        if (item.CanWrite)
        {
            //value types can simply be 'set'
            if (item.PropertyType.IsValueType || item.PropertyType.IsEnum || item.PropertyType.Equals(typeof(System.String)))
            {
                item.SetValue(opTarget, item.GetValue(opSource, null), null);
            }
            //object/complex types need to recursively call this method until the end of the tree is reached
            else
            {
                object opPropertyValue = item.GetValue(opSource, null);
                if (opPropertyValue == null)
                {
                    item.SetValue(opTarget, null, null);
                }
                else
                {
                    item.SetValue(opTarget, CloneObject(opPropertyValue), null);
                }
            }
        }
    }
    //return the new item
    return opTarget;
}

我提出这一点是为了克服.NET的一个缺点,即必须手动深度复制List<T>。

我使用这个:

static public IEnumerable<SpotPlacement> CloneList(List<SpotPlacement> spotPlacements)
{
    foreach (SpotPlacement sp in spotPlacements)
    {
        yield return (SpotPlacement)sp.Clone();
    }
}

在另一个地方:

public object Clone()
{
    OrderItem newOrderItem = new OrderItem();
    ...
    newOrderItem._exactPlacements.AddRange(SpotPlacement.CloneList(_exactPlacements));
    ...
    return newOrderItem;
}

我试图提出一个这样做的oneliner,但这是不可能的,因为yield不能在匿名方法块中工作。

更好的是,使用通用的List<T>克隆器:

class Utility<T> where T : ICloneable
{
    static public IEnumerable<T> CloneList(List<T> tl)
    {
        foreach (T t in tl)
        {
            yield return (T)t.Clone();
        }
    }
}

当使用Marc Gravells protobuf net作为序列化程序时,接受的答案需要一些轻微的修改,因为要复制的对象不会被归因于[Serializable],因此不可序列化,Clone方法将抛出异常。我修改了它以与protobuf net一起使用:

public static T Clone<T>(this T source)
{
    if(Attribute.GetCustomAttribute(typeof(T), typeof(ProtoBuf.ProtoContractAttribute))
           == null)
    {
        throw new ArgumentException("Type has no ProtoContract!", "source");
    }

    if(Object.ReferenceEquals(source, null))
    {
        return default(T);
    }

    IFormatter formatter = ProtoBuf.Serializer.CreateFormatter<T>();
    using (Stream stream = new MemoryStream())
    {
        formatter.Serialize(stream, source);
        stream.Seek(0, SeekOrigin.Begin);
        return (T)formatter.Deserialize(stream);
    }
}

这将检查[ProtoControl]属性的存在,并使用protobufs自己的格式化程序来序列化对象。

在我使用的代码库中,我们有一个来自GitHub项目Burtsev Alexey/net对象深度副本的ObjectExtension.cs文件副本。它已经9岁了。虽然我们后来意识到,对于更大的对象结构来说,它是非常慢的,但它还是有效的。

相反,我们在GitHub项目jpmikkers/Baksteen.Extensions.DeepCopy中找到了ObjectExtension.cs文件的一个分支。以前对大型数据结构的深度复制操作需要大约30分钟,现在感觉几乎是瞬间完成的。

此改进版本包含以下文档:

用于快速对象克隆的C#扩展方法。这是Alexey Burtsev深度复印机的速度优化叉。根据您的使用情况,这将比原始版本快2倍-3倍。它还修复了原始代码中存在的一些错误。与经典的二进制序列化/反序列化深度克隆技术相比,此版本的速度大约快七倍(对象包含的数组越多,加速因子越大)。通过以下技术实现加速:缓存对象反射结果不要深度复制原语或不可变结构&类(例如枚举和字符串)为了提高引用的局部性,处理内部循环中的“快速”维度或多维数组使用编译的lambda表达式调用MemberwiseClone如何使用:使用Baksteen.Extensions.DeepCopy;...var myobject=新建SomeClass();...var myclone=myobject.DepCopy()!;//创建原始对象的新深度副本注意:只有在项目中启用了可为null的引用类型时,才需要感叹号(null原谅运算符)

我已经创建了一个可接受答案的版本,该版本同时适用于“[Serializable]”和“[DataContract]”。我写它已经有一段时间了,但如果我没有记错,[DataContract]需要一个不同的序列化程序。

需要System、System.IO、System.Runtime.Serialization、System.Runtime.Serialization.Formatters.Binary、System.Xml;

public static class ObjectCopier
{

    /// <summary>
    /// Perform a deep Copy of an object that is marked with '[Serializable]' or '[DataContract]'
    /// </summary>
    /// <typeparam name="T">The type of object being copied.</typeparam>
    /// <param name="source">The object instance to copy.</param>
    /// <returns>The copied object.</returns>
    public static T Clone<T>(T source)
    {
        if (typeof(T).IsSerializable == true)
        {
            return CloneUsingSerializable<T>(source);
        }

        if (IsDataContract(typeof(T)) == true)
        {
            return CloneUsingDataContracts<T>(source);
        }

        throw new ArgumentException("The type must be Serializable or use DataContracts.", "source");
    }


    /// <summary>
    /// Perform a deep Copy of an object that is marked with '[Serializable]'
    /// </summary>
    /// <remarks>
    /// Found on http://stackoverflow.com/questions/78536/cloning-objects-in-c-sharp
    /// Uses code found on CodeProject, which allows free use in third party apps
    /// - http://www.codeproject.com/KB/tips/SerializedObjectCloner.aspx
    /// </remarks>
    /// <typeparam name="T">The type of object being copied.</typeparam>
    /// <param name="source">The object instance to copy.</param>
    /// <returns>The copied object.</returns>
    public static T CloneUsingSerializable<T>(T source)
    {
        if (!typeof(T).IsSerializable)
        {
            throw new ArgumentException("The type must be serializable.", "source");
        }

        // Don't serialize a null object, simply return the default for that object
        if (Object.ReferenceEquals(source, null))
        {
            return default(T);
        }

        IFormatter formatter = new BinaryFormatter();
        Stream stream = new MemoryStream();
        using (stream)
        {
            formatter.Serialize(stream, source);
            stream.Seek(0, SeekOrigin.Begin);
            return (T)formatter.Deserialize(stream);
        }
    }


    /// <summary>
    /// Perform a deep Copy of an object that is marked with '[DataContract]'
    /// </summary>
    /// <typeparam name="T">The type of object being copied.</typeparam>
    /// <param name="source">The object instance to copy.</param>
    /// <returns>The copied object.</returns>
    public static T CloneUsingDataContracts<T>(T source)
    {
        if (IsDataContract(typeof(T)) == false)
        {
            throw new ArgumentException("The type must be a data contract.", "source");
        }

        // ** Don't serialize a null object, simply return the default for that object
        if (Object.ReferenceEquals(source, null))
        {
            return default(T);
        }

        DataContractSerializer dcs = new DataContractSerializer(typeof(T));
        using(Stream stream = new MemoryStream())
        {
            using (XmlDictionaryWriter writer = XmlDictionaryWriter.CreateBinaryWriter(stream))
            {
                dcs.WriteObject(writer, source);
                writer.Flush();
                stream.Seek(0, SeekOrigin.Begin);
                using (XmlDictionaryReader reader = XmlDictionaryReader.CreateBinaryReader(stream, XmlDictionaryReaderQuotas.Max))
                {
                    return (T)dcs.ReadObject(reader);
                }
            }
        }
    }


    /// <summary>
    /// Helper function to check if a class is a [DataContract]
    /// </summary>
    /// <param name="type">The type of the object to check.</param>
    /// <returns>Boolean flag indicating if the class is a DataContract (true) or not (false) </returns>
    public static bool IsDataContract(Type type)
    {
        object[] attributes = type.GetCustomAttributes(typeof(DataContractAttribute), false);
        return attributes.Length == 1;
    }

}