如果有人只是在寻找IntelliJ类:您可以从maven存储库中使用

<dependency>
    <groupId>org.jetbrains</groupId>
    <artifactId>annotations</artifactId>
    <version>15.0</version>
</dependency> 

Another option is the annotations provided with ANTLR 4. Following Pull Request #434, the artifact containing the @NotNull and @Nullable annotations includes an annotation processor that produces compile-time errors and/or warnings in the event one of these attributes is misused (for example, if both are applied to the same item, or if @Nullable is applied to item with a primitive type). The annotation processor provides additional assurance during the software development process that the information conveyed by the application of these annotations is accurate, including in cases of method inheritance.

安卓

这个答案是Android特有的。Android有一个支持包叫做support-annotations。它提供了几十个Android特定的注释，也提供了常见的注释，如NonNull, Nullable等。

要添加support-annotations包，在build.gradle中添加以下依赖项:

compile 'com.android.support:support-annotations:23.1.1'

然后使用:

import android.support.annotation.NonNull;

void foobar(@NonNull Foo bar) {}

在等待上游(Java 8?)整理这些注释时，您还可以定义自己的项目本地@NotNull和@Nullable注释。这在使用Java SE时也很有用，因为默认情况下javax.validation.constraints是不可用的。

import java.lang.annotation.*;

/**
 * Designates that a field, return value, argument, or variable is
 * guaranteed to be non-null.
 */
@Target({ElementType.FIELD, ElementType.METHOD, ElementType.PARAMETER, ElementType.LOCAL_VARIABLE})
@Documented
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.CLASS)
public @interface NotNull {}

/**
 * Designates that a field, return value, argument, or variable may be null.
 */
@Target({ElementType.FIELD, ElementType.METHOD, ElementType.PARAMETER, ElementType.LOCAL_VARIABLE})
@Documented
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.CLASS)
public @interface Nullable {}

不可否认，这主要是为了装饰或未来的目的，因为上面显然没有为这些注释的静态分析增加任何支持。

我非常喜欢检查器框架，它是类型注释(JSR-308)的实现，用于实现像null检查器这样的缺陷检查器。我并没有尝试其他任何方法进行比较，但我对这个实现感到满意。

我没有加入提供该软件的组织，但我是它的粉丝。

我喜欢这个系统的四个方面:

It has a defect checkers for nullness (@Nullable), but also has ones for immutability and interning (and others). I use the first one (nullness) and I'm trying to get into using the second one (immutability/IGJ). I'm trying out the third one, but I'm not certain about using it long term yet. I'm not convinced of the general usefulness of the other checkers yet, but its nice to know that the framework itself is a system for implementing a variety of additional annotations and checkers. The default setting for nullness checking works well: Non-null except locals (NNEL). Basically this means that by default the checker treats everyhing (instance variables, method parameters, generic types, etc) except local variables as if they have a @NonNull type by default. Per the documentation: The NNEL default leads to the smallest number of explicit annotations in your code. You can set a different default for a class or for a method if NNEL doesn't work for you. This framework allows you to use with without creating a dependency on the framework by enclosing your annotations in a comment: e.g. /*@Nullable*/. This is nice because you can annotate and check a library or shared code, but still be able to use that library/shared coded in another project that doesn't use the framework. This is a nice feature. I've grown accustom to using it, even though I tend to enable the Checker Framework on all my projects now. The framework has a way to annotate APIs you use that aren't already annotated for nullness by using stub files.

太阳现在没有自己的了吗?这是什么: http://www.java2s.com/Open-Source/Java-Document/6.0-JDK-Modules-com.sun/istack/com.sun.istack.internal.htm

这似乎与我在过去几年中使用过的所有Java版本都打包在一起。

编辑:正如下面评论中提到的，你可能不想使用这些。在这种情况下，我的投票是IntelliJ jetbrains注释!