y = np.array([0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1])

如果你知道它们是0和1

np.sum(y)

给出1的个数。Np.sum (1-y)给出0。

一般来说，如果你想计算0而不是0(但可能是2或3):

np.count_nonzero(y)

给出非零的个数。

但是如果您需要更复杂的东西，我不认为numpy将提供一个很好的计数选项。在这种情况下，转到集合:

import collections
collections.Counter(y)
> Counter({0: 8, 1: 4})

这就像字典一样

collections.Counter(y)[0]
> 8

对于您的情况，还可以查看numpy.bincount

In [56]: a = np.array([0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1])

In [57]: np.bincount(a)
Out[57]: array([8, 4])  #count of zeros is at index 0, i.e. 8
                        #count of ones is at index 1, i.e. 4

使用numpy怎么样?count_non0，类似的

>>> import numpy as np
>>> y = np.array([1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 0, 2, 3, 3, 3, 0, 0, 2, 2, 0])

>>> np.count_nonzero(y == 1)
1
>>> np.count_nonzero(y == 2)
7
>>> np.count_nonzero(y == 3)
3

一个普遍而简单的答案是:

numpy.sum(MyArray==x)   # sum of a binary list of the occurence of x (=0 or 1) in MyArray

这将导致这完整的代码作为例子

import numpy
MyArray=numpy.array([0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1])  # array we want to search in
x=0   # the value I want to count (can be iterator, in a list, etc.)
numpy.sum(MyArray==0)   # sum of a binary list of the occurence of x in MyArray

现在，如果MyArray是多维的，你想要计算值在直线(= pattern以后)上分布的次数。

MyArray=numpy.array([[6, 1],[4, 5],[0, 7],[5, 1],[2, 5],[1, 2],[3, 2],[0, 2],[2, 5],[5, 1],[3, 0]])
x=numpy.array([5,1])   # the value I want to count (can be iterator, in a list, etc.)
temp = numpy.ascontiguousarray(MyArray).view(numpy.dtype((numpy.void, MyArray.dtype.itemsize * MyArray.shape[1])))  # convert the 2d-array into an array of analyzable patterns
xt=numpy.ascontiguousarray(x).view(numpy.dtype((numpy.void, x.dtype.itemsize * x.shape[0])))  # convert what you search into one analyzable pattern
numpy.sum(temp==xt)  # count of the searched pattern in the list of patterns

另一个简单的解决方案可能是使用numpy.count_nonzero():

import numpy as np
y = np.array([0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1])
y_nonzero_num = np.count_nonzero(y==1)
y_zero_num = np.count_nonzero(y==0)
y_nonzero_num
4
y_zero_num
8

不要让这个名字误导了你，如果你像例子中那样使用布尔值，它会达到目的的。

没有人建议使用numpy。Bincount (input, minlength)与minlength = np.size(input)，但这似乎是一个很好的解决方案，而且绝对是最快的:

In [1]: choices = np.random.randint(0, 100, 10000)

In [2]: %timeit [ np.sum(choices == k) for k in range(min(choices), max(choices)+1) ]
100 loops, best of 3: 2.67 ms per loop

In [3]: %timeit np.unique(choices, return_counts=True)
1000 loops, best of 3: 388 µs per loop

In [4]: %timeit np.bincount(choices, minlength=np.size(choices))
100000 loops, best of 3: 16.3 µs per loop

numpy之间的加速太疯狂了。unique(x, return_counts=True)和numpy。Bincount (x, minlength=np.max(x)) !