这里有一行。我对它进行了计时，它与顶部答案的性能相当，并且随着更大的seq逐渐变得更好，len(seq) = 20时慢20%，len(seq) = 10000时慢7%

zip(*[seq[i:(len(seq) - n - 1 + i)] for i in range(n)])

deque窗口的一个轻微修改版本，使其成为一个真正的滚动窗口。因此，它开始只填充一个元素，然后增长到它的最大窗口大小，然后缩小，因为它的左边缘接近结束:

from collections import deque
def window(seq, n=2):
    it = iter(seq)
    win = deque((next(it, None) for _ in xrange(1)), maxlen=n)
    yield win
    append = win.append
    for e in it:
        append(e)
        yield win
    for _ in xrange(len(win)-1):
        win.popleft()
        yield win

for wnd in window(range(5), n=3):
    print(list(wnd))

这给了

[0]
[0, 1]
[0, 1, 2]
[1, 2, 3]
[2, 3, 4]
[3, 4]
[4]

>>> n, m = 6, 3
>>> k = n - m+1
>>> print ('{}\n'*(k)).format(*[range(i, i+m) for i in xrange(k)])
[0, 1, 2]
[1, 2, 3]
[2, 3, 4]
[3, 4, 5]

更新

Kelly发现这是一个重复的答案。但我在这里留下这个作为反例，因为我包含了一个毫无意义的最小值。

所以如果你想用min来避免IndexError，没有必要，range会帮你处理这种情况。

旧的答案

奇怪的是，当n > len(l)返回[]时，下面的句柄在语义上是正确的。

>>> l = [0, 1, 2, 3, 4]

>>> n = 2
>>> [l[i: i + min(n, len(l)-i)] for i in range(len(l)-n+1)]
>>> [[0, 1], [1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]
>>>
>>> n = 3
>>> [l[i: i + min(n, len(l)-i)] for i in range(len(l)-n+1)]
>>> [[0, 1, 2], [1, 2, 3], [2, 3, 4]]
>>>
>>> n = 4
>>> [l[i: i + min(n, len(l)-i)] for i in range(len(l)-n+1)]
>>> [[0, 1, 2, 3], [1, 2, 3, 4]]
>>>
>>> n = 5
>>> [l[i: i + min(n, len(l)-i)] for i in range(len(l)-n+1)]
>>> [[0, 1, 2, 3, 4]]
>>>
>>> n = 10 # n > len(l)
>>> [l[i: i + min(n, len(l)-i)] for i in range(len(l)-n+1)]
>>> []

另一种从列表生成固定长度窗口的简单方法

from collections import deque

def window(ls,window_size=3):
    window = deque(maxlen=window_size)

    for element in ls:
        
        if len(window)==window_size:
            yield list(window)
        window.append(element)

ls = [0,1,2,3,4,5]

for w in window(ls):
    print(w)

def GetShiftingWindows(thelist, size):
    return [ thelist[x:x+size] for x in range( len(thelist) - size + 1 ) ]

>> a = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
>> GetShiftingWindows(a, 3)
[ [1, 2, 3], [2, 3, 4], [3, 4, 5] ]