学习PowerShell时发现:

试着猜一下结果数组是什么样的:

$a = 1, 2
$b = 1, 2+3
$c = 1, 2*3

答案:

1, 2
1, 2, 3
1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2

哎哟!它动摇了我对PowerShell及其开发人员的信心。

在Perl中，你可以做到:

my $test = "Hello World";
substr($test, 0, 5) = "Goodbye";

print $test;

这在其他语言中可行吗?

在c#中，这至少应该生成一个编译器警告，但它没有:

public int Something
{
    get { return Something; }
    set { Something = value; }
}

当被调用时，它会导致你的应用程序崩溃，你不会得到一个好的堆栈跟踪，因为它是一个StackOverflowException。

Haskell's use of Maybe and Just. Maybe a is a type constructor that returns a type of Just a, but Maybe Int won't accept just an Int, it requires it to be a Just Int or Nothing. So in essence in haskell parlance Just Int is about as much of an Int as an apple is an orange. The only connection is that Just 5 returns a type of Maybe Interger, which can be constructed with the function Just and an Integer argument. This makes sense but is about as hard to explain as it can theoretically be, which is the purpose of haskell right? So is Just really JustKindaLikeButNotAtAll yea sorta, and is Maybe really a KindaLooksLikeOrIsNothing, yea sorta again.

-- Create a function that returns a Maybe Int, and return a 5, which know is definitly Int'able
>  let x :: Maybe Int; x = 5;
<interactive>:1:24:
    No instance for (Num (Maybe Int))
      arising from the literal `5' at <interactive>:1:24
    Possible fix: add an instance declaration for (Num (Maybe Int))
    In the expression: 5
    In the definition of `x': x = 5

>  Just 5  
Just 5
it :: Maybe Integer

    -- Create a function x which takes an Int
>  let x :: Int -> Int; x _ = 0;
x :: Int -> Int
-- Try to give it a Just Int
>  x $ Just 5                   

<interactive>:1:4:
    Couldn't match expected type `Int' against inferred type `Maybe t'
    In the second argument of `($)', namely `Just 5'
    In the expression: x $ Just 5
    In the definition of `it': it = x $ Just 5

祝你好运读到这篇文章，我希望它是正确的。

在早期版本的Visual Basic中，没有“Return”语句的函数只是“Return None”，没有任何编译器警告(或错误)。

这导致了最疯狂的调试会话，那时我必须每天处理这种语言。

Java的访问修饰符对我来说是最近的一个WTF(因为我必须学习一点)。

显然，包比类层次结构更亲密。我不能定义对子类可见但对包中的其他类不可见的方法和属性。为什么我要将一个类的内部共享给其他类呢?

但是我可以定义对包内的每个类可见的属性和方法，但对包外的子类不可见。

不管我怎么想，我还是看不出其中的逻辑。切换访问修饰符，使受保护的行为就像它在c++中工作一样，并保持包的私有修饰符，这是有意义的。但现在不是了。