为什么c#的List<T>.AddRange()不让我添加T的子类型的元素?阀门列表< T > () ! 微软只需要多写一行代码:

public void AddRange<S>(
    IEnumerable<S> collection
) where S : T

c++模板机制是图灵完备的:只要在运行时不需要输入，就可以在编译时进行任意计算。任意的。或者你可以很容易地编写一个永远不会编译的c++程序——但是语法是正确的。

在fortran中(当然是77，可能在95中也是如此)，未声明的变量和以I到N开头的参数(“In”组)将是INTEGER，所有其他未声明的变量和参数将是REAL(源)。这与“在某些情况下可选的空白”相结合，导致了最著名的错误之一。

正如弗雷德·韦伯在1990年的《另类民间传说:计算机》一书中所说:

I worked at Nasa during the summer of 1963. The group I was working in was doing preliminary work on the Mission Control Center computer systems and programs. My office mate had the job of testing out an orbit computation program which had been used during the Mercury flights. Running some test data with known answers through it, he was getting answers that were close, but not accurate enough. So, he started looking for numerical problems in the algorithm, checking to make sure his tests data was really correct, etc. After a couple of weeks with no results, he came across a DO statement, in the form: DO 10 I=1.10 This statement was interpreted by the compiler (correctly) as: DO10I = 1.10 The programmer had clearly intended: DO 10 I = 1, 10 After changing the . to a , the program results were correct to the desired accuracy. Apparently, the program's answers had been "good enough" for the sub-orbital Mercury flights, so no one suspected a bug until they tried to get greater accuracy, in anticipation of later orbital and moon flights. As far as I know, this particular bug was never blamed for any actual failure of a space flight, but the other details here seem close enough that I'm sure this incident is the source of the DO story.

我认为这是一个很大的WTF，如果DO10I被作为DO10I，并且反过来，因为隐式声明被认为是类型REAL。这是个很棒的故事。

在Python中:

>>> x = 4
>>> y = 1000000
>>> x is 4
True
>>> y is 1000000
False
>>>

如果你不相信，就试试吧!

我一直是PHP错误的忠实粉丝，当在一行中使用两个冒号时脱离上下文:

解析错误:语法错误，第3行/path/to/file/error.php中的T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM异常

第一次遇到这种情况时，我完全被弄糊涂了。

当我在大学的时候，我用一种叫做SNOBOL的语言做了一点工作。整个语言虽然很酷，但却是一个大WTF。

它的语法是我见过的最奇怪的。而不是GoTo，你使用:(标签)。当你有:S(label)(成功/true时的goto标签)和:F(label)(失败/false时的goto标签)并且你在一行中使用这些函数检查某些条件或读取文件时，谁还需要if呢?所以这个表述是:

H = INPUT :F(end)

将从文件或控制台读取下一行，如果读取失败(因为到达EOF或任何其他原因)，将转到标签“end”。

然后是$ sign操作符。它将使用变量中的值作为变量名。所以:

ANIMAL = 'DOG'
DOG = 'BARK'
output = $ANIMAL

将在控制台上显示'BARK'值。因为这还不够奇怪:

$DOG = 'SOUND'

将创建一个名为BARK的变量(参见上面分配给DOG的值)，并赋予它一个“SOUND”的值。

你看得越多，情况就越糟。我所发现的关于SNOBOL的最好的陈述(来自链接文本)是“该语言的强大功能及其相当惯用的控制流特性使得编写后的SNOBOL4代码几乎不可能阅读和理解。”