另一个Python实现比死亡面具推销员的答案更直接，也更快:

import numpy as np

def prime_numbers(limit: int) -> list[int]:
    """Provide a list of all prime numbers <= the limit."""
    is_prime = np.full((limit + 1, ), True)
    is_prime[0:2] = False
    for n in range(2, limit + 1):
        if is_prime[n]:
            is_prime[n**2::n] = False
    return list(np.where(is_prime)[0])

你可以进一步优化，例如，排除2，或者硬编码更多质数，但我想保持简单。

*示例运行时比较(注意:我使用了其他实现的优化形式，见我的评论):

这取决于您的应用程序。这里有一些注意事项:

你需要的仅仅是一些数字是否是质数的信息，你需要所有的质数达到一定的限度，还是你需要(潜在的)所有的质数? 你要处理的数字有多大?

米勒-拉宾和模拟测试只比筛选超过一定规模的数字(我相信大约在几百万左右)的速度快。在这以下，使用试除法(如果你只有几个数字)或筛子会更快。

这是我一直在玩的埃拉托色尼筛子的Python实现。

def eratosthenes(maximum: int) -> list[int | None]:
    """
    Find all the prime numbers between 2 and `maximum`.

    Args:
        maximum: The maximum number to check.

    Returns:
        A list of primes between 2 and `maximum`.
    """

    if maximum < 2:
        return []

    # Discard even numbers by default.
    sequence = dict.fromkeys(range(3, maximum+1, 2), True)

    for num, is_prime in sequence.items():
        # Already filtered, let's skip it.
        if not is_prime:
            continue

        # Avoid marking the same number twice.
        for num2 in range(num ** 2, maximum+1, num):
            # Here, `num2` might contain an even number - skip it.
            if num2 in sequence:
                sequence[num2] = False

    # Re-add 2 as prime and filter out the composite numbers.
    return [2] + [num for num, is_prime in sequence.items() if is_prime]

在一台简陋的三星Galaxy A40上，该代码大约需要16秒才能输入10000000个数字。

欢迎提出建议!

如果它必须非常快，你可以包括一个质数列表: http://www.bigprimes.net/archive/prime/

如果你只想知道某个数是不是质数，维基百科上列出了各种质数判别法。它们可能是确定大数是否为质数的最快方法，特别是因为它们可以告诉你一个数是否为质数。

这是找到从1到n的所有质数的最快算法(在我的电脑上，它只花了0.004秒就找到了从1到1000000的所有质数)。

#include <iostream>
#include <fstream>

using namespace std;

double FindPrime(bool* array, int size){
clock_t start;
double runtime;
for (int i = 2; i < size; i++)
    array[i] = true;
start = clock();
for (int i = 2; i <= size; i++)
    if (array[i])
        for (int j = 2 * i; j < size; j += i)
            array[j] = false;
runtime = (double)(clock() - start) / CLOCKS_PER_SEC;
return runtime;
}


int main() {
ofstream fout("prime.txt");
int n = 0;
cout << "Enter the upper limit of prime numbers searching algorithm:";
cin >> n;
bool* array = new bool[n + 1];
double duration = FindPrime(array, n + 1);
printf("\n%f seconds.\n", duration);
for (int i = 2; i <= n; i++)
    if (array[i])
        fout << i << endl;
fout.close();

return 0;
}

I know it's somewhat later, but this could be useful to people arriving here from searches. Anyway, here's some JavaScript that relies on the fact that only prime factors need to be tested, so the earlier primes generated by the code are re-used as test factors for later ones. Of course, all even and mod 5 values are filtered out first. The result will be in the array P, and this code can crunch 10 million primes in under 1.5 seconds on an i7 PC (or 100 million in about 20). Rewritten in C it should be very fast.

var P = [1, 2], j, k, l = 3

for (k = 3 ; k < 10000000 ; k += 2)
{
  loop: if (++l < 5)
  {
    for (j = 2 ; P[j] <= Math.sqrt(k) ; ++j)
      if (k % P[j] == 0) break loop

    P[P.length] = k
  }
  else l = 0
}