以下哪一种技术是整数除2的最佳选择,为什么?

技巧1:

x = x >> 1;

技巧2:

x = x / 2;

这里x是整数。


当前回答

一般右移分为:

q = i >> n; is the same as: q = i / 2**n;

这有时被用来加快程序的速度,但以清晰度为代价。我觉得你不应该这么做。编译器足够智能,可以自动执行加速。这意味着,以清晰度为代价,你不会获得任何好处。

看看《实用c++编程》的这一页。

其他回答

这个问题的答案取决于你工作的环境。

If you're working on an 8-bit microcontroller or anything without hardware support for multiplication, bit shifting is expected and commonplace, and while the compiler will almost certainly turn x /= 2 into x >>= 1, the presence of a division symbol will raise more eyebrows in that environment than using a shift to effect a division. If you're working in a performance-critical environment or section of code, or your code could be compiled with compiler optimization off, x >>= 1 with a comment explaining its reasoning is probably best just for clarity of purpose. If you're not under one of the above conditions, make your code more readable by simply using x /= 2. Better to save the next programmer who happens to look at your code the 10 second double-take on your shift operation than to needlessly prove you knew the shift was more efficient sans compiler optimization.

所有这些假设都是无符号整数。简单的移位可能不是你想要的符号。此外,DanielH提出了一个关于在ActionScript等特定语言中使用x *= 0.5的好观点。

就CPU而言,位移运算比除法运算快。 然而,编译器知道这一点,并将适当地优化到它可以的程度, 因此,您可以以最有意义的方式编写代码,并且知道您的代码是有意义的 有效地运行。但是请记住,由于前面指出的原因,在某些情况下,无符号整型可以比整型更好地优化。 如果你不需要符号算术,那么不要包含符号位。

x / 2更清晰,x >> 1快不了多少(根据一个微基准测试,对于Java JVM快30%左右)。正如其他人所注意到的,对于负数,舍入略有不同,所以当您想处理负数时必须考虑这一点。一些编译器可能会自动将x / 2转换为x >> 1,如果他们知道这个数字不可能是负数(即使我无法验证这一点)。

即使x / 2可能不使用(慢)除法CPU指令,因为一些捷径是可能的,但它仍然比x >> 1慢。

(This is a C / C++ question, other programming languages have more operators. For Java there is also the unsigned right shift, x >>> 1, which is again different. It allows to correctly calculate the mean (average) value of two values, so that (a + b) >>> 1 will return the mean value even for very large values of a and b. This is required for example for binary search if the array indices can get very large. There was a bug in many versions of binary search, because they used (a + b) / 2 to calculate the average. This doesn't work correctly. The correct solution is to use (a + b) >>> 1 instead.)

第一个看起来像除法吗?不。如果你想除法,用x / 2。如果可能的话,编译器可以优化它使用位移位(它被称为强度减少),这使得它成为一个无用的微优化,如果你自己做它。

一般右移分为:

q = i >> n; is the same as: q = i / 2**n;

这有时被用来加快程序的速度,但以清晰度为代价。我觉得你不应该这么做。编译器足够智能,可以自动执行加速。这意味着,以清晰度为代价,你不会获得任何好处。

看看《实用c++编程》的这一页。