这个问题来自于对过去50年左右计算领域各种进展的评论。

其他一些与会者请我把这个问题作为一个问题向整个论坛提出。

这里的基本思想不是抨击事物的现状,而是试图理解提出基本新思想和原则的过程。

我认为我们在大多数计算领域都需要真正的新想法,我想知道最近已经完成的任何重要而有力的想法。如果我们真的找不到他们,那么我们应该问“为什么?”和“我们应该做什么?”


当前回答

当然,1980年以前是施乐PARC的辉煌时期。在图形用户界面、鼠标、激光打印机、互联网和个人电脑刚刚诞生的时候。(鉴于我太年轻了,不可能活在那个年代,而你几乎在努力发明所有这些东西,关于1980年的事情,我不能告诉你任何你不知道的事情,所以我们继续吧。)

The thing is, though, that the pre-1980 days were a lot more vibrant in terms of truly disruptive new technologies. That's the way it is with any new field -- hwo many game-changing technology advances have you seen in railroads in the past 100 years? How many have you seen in lightbulbs? In the printing press? Once something ignites a hype in the right circles, there is an explosive period of invention, followed by a long period of maturing. After that, you're not going to see the same kind of completely radical changes again UNLESS the basic circumstances change.

幸运的是,这可能会发生在一些领域,而且已经发生在其他一些领域:

Mobility - smart phones bring computing to a truly portable platform, which will soon include location-based services and proximity-based ad-hoc networks. It's a completely new paradigm that's potentially as game-changing as the GUI has been The WWW (HTTP, HTML and DNS) has already been mentioned and is an obvious addition to the list, since it is enabling global, inexpensive, mainstream rich communication across the globe - all thanks to a computing platform On the interface side, both touch, multitouch (Jeff Han comes to mind) and the Wiimote need mentioning. Currently, they are basically curiosities, but so were the early GUIs. OOP design patterns -- higher level solutions as best practices to hard problems. Depending on your definition of 'computing', it may or may not belong on the list, but if you count OOP as a significant advance pre-1980 (I certainly do), I think design patterns and the GoF deserve a mention too Google's PageRank and MapReduce algorithms - I am pleased to notice I wasn't the first to mention them, and seriously --- where would the world be without the principles of both of them? I vividly remember what the world looked like before them, and suffice it to say Google really IS my friend. Non-volatile memory -- it's on the hardware side, but it is going to play a significant role in the future of computing - making bootup times a thing of the past, for example, and enabling us to use computers in entirely new ways Semantic (natural language) search / analysis / classification / translation... We're not quite there yet, but companies like Powerset give the impression that we're on the brink. On that note, intelligent HTMs should be on this list as well. I am yet another believer in Jeff Hawkins' model and approach, and if it works, it will mean a complete redefinition of what computers can do, what it means to be human, and where the world can go from here. Creating a real intelligence in that way (synthetically) would be bigger than anything the human race has accomplished before. GNU + Linux 3D printing / rapid prototyping (and, in time, manufacturing) P2P (which also lead to VoIP etc.) E-ink, once the technologies mature a bit more RFID might belong on the list, but the verdict is still out on that one Quantum Computing is the most obvious element on the list, except we still haven't been able to get enough qubits to play along. However, my friends in the field tell me there's incredible progress going on even as we speak, so I'm holding my breath for that one. And finally, I want to mention a personal favourite: distributed intelligence, or its other name: artificial artificial intelligence. The idea of connecting a huge number of people in a network and allowing them access to the combined minds of everyone else through some form of question answering interface. It's been done a number of times recently, with Yahoo Answers, Askville, Amazon Mechanical Turk, and so on, but in my mind, those are all missing the mark by a LOT... much like the many implementations of distributed hypertext that came before Tim Berners-Lee's HTML, or the many web crawlers before Google. Seriously -- someone needs to build an search interface into 'the hive mind' to blow everyone else out of the water. IMHO - it is only a matter of time.

其他回答

The mouse - There have been posts about human interaction. To me, the mouse was the gateway to human interaction. Without it, we'd still be typing and not clicking in dragging, even with our fingers. GUI - Complimented the mouse perfectly. I work in an environment where an as400 is the backend of one of our major apps. Yeah.. Interesting stuff but it just reminds me of the screens 'Bill Gates' is working in in the movie 'Pirates of Silicon Valley' even though that's not what it was. To me, 1 and 2 are the reason anybody, including grandpas and grandmas can use a computer. Excel / spreadsheets - Someone mentioned this before but it's work mentioning again. It's so user friendly and is a great entry point for non-technical users to try their hand at simple programming concepts when performing calculations on cells. Granted it came out before 1980, but the versions post 1980 are when the technology in spreadsheets evolved. Internet (of course) - Not sure how people wrote code without it! Don't flame me for repeating because this belongs on every list. INTELLISENSE - LOVE IT LOVE IT LOVE IT!!!!

电可擦可编程存储器,概括为非易失性读/写存储器,目前最著名和最普遍的是Flash。 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EEPROM列出了这个发明于1984年。

通过赋予存储介质与处理单元相同的物理特性、功率要求、大小和稳定性,我们消除了在设计处理器位置时的限制因素。这扩大了我们如何以及在何处为如此多的智能设备(以及以前根本不被认为是智能的东西)赋予“智能”的可能性,以至于我们仍然被这股浪潮所吸引。Mp3播放器只是其中的一小部分。

前提:自1980年以来几乎没有新发明。

要做的第一件事是定义发明,否则你就会误入歧途。Dictionary.com对发明的第二个定义是:

美国专利法。一种新的、有用的工艺、机器、改进等,以前不存在,被认为是某种独特的直觉或天才的产物,区别于普通的机械技能或工艺。

因此,自1980年以来,计算机领域的新发明很少。都发生了什么?显然,有大量的新技术和新事物出现,但它们是什么呢?

我们不再发明了,我们只是在改进已经存在的东西。

举个简单的例子:

光盘最早出现于1977年,但直到1982年才被业界接受。此时,第一家刻录cd的工厂刚刚准备就绪。最终,到1985年,CD-ROM(只读存储器)被接受为一种媒介。5年后,CD-RW问世。(来源:维基百科)

现在怎么办呢?好吧,考虑到我们有更大的硬盘驱动器(仍然只是在范式上的改进),我们需要更多的空间来取代VHS市场,使视频与计算机兼容。于是就有了DVD,尽管我删去了对现有CD技术的许多改进。

DVD是在1995年被“发明”出来的。(来源:维基百科)

从那时起,我们有:

可写dvd和可重写dvd 双层dvd 三层和四层dvd(尚未发布,但通过简单的驱动程序修订是可行的) hd - dvd 蓝光光盘

显然,这个列表并不包括所有的内容。但是注意新发明,记住我上面给出的定义,在那个列表中。你不能!它们都是光盘概念的变体,都是相同硬件的变体,都是现有软件的变体。

WHY?

成本。你看,对现有产品进行渐进式改进在经济上更便宜。如果我可以卖给你一张HD DVD或蓝光光盘,因为你认为它是必要的或很酷,那么我就没有必要发布我的三层或四层DVD计划。事实上,我可以收取很高的费用来获得新技术,因为您是早期采用者,您需要我的“新的和改进的!”硬件。

这就是所谓的市场营销或产品关系。

但是软件呢?

怎么了?在1980年之前,有很多软件创新在进行,但从那以后,它主要只是对已经存在的东西进行改进或重新发明轮子。看看任何操作系统或办公软件包就知道了。

结论

As far as I'm concerned, there have been virtually no new inventions in the past 29 years. I could wax long and cross a great many industries, but why should I bother? Once you start thinking about it, and start comparing an "invention" to a prior, similar product ... you'll find it is so similar that it isn't even funny. Even the internal combustion engine has been around since 1906 with no new inventions in that field since then; many improvements and variations of this "wheel" yes, but no new inventions.

甚至连美国在伊拉克部署的新武器——利用微波让人感到震惊,就像触摸灯泡一样——都不是新武器。同样的想法被用于安全系统,然后被分类并退出市场,用超声波让入侵者感到身体不适。这是一种定向形式的武器,具有不同的波长和应用,不是一项新发明。

用于人机交互的触摸屏和体感界面。

例如:

pda、iPhone或任天堂DS的触屏 运动感应,任天堂Wii控制器或(在较小程度上)Playstation 3的SixAxis控制器。

唯一的问题是…这些技术真的是80后吗?