我有一个非常具体的用例，我需要在dom中呈现一个类，然后设置另一个类。这就是我的解决方案，我发现它相当优雅。

const [value1, setValue1] = useState({value: 'whatever', onValue: false})


useEffect(() => {
    setValue1(prev => ({
      value: 'whatever',
      onValue: !prev.onValue, 
    }));
}, ['whatever'])

 
useEffect(() => {

// if you want to ensure the render happens before doThing2() then put it in a timeout of 1ms,
  setTimeout(doThing2, 1); 

// or if you are happy to call it immediately after setting value don't include the timeout
 doThing2()


}, [value1.onValue])

我写了自定义挂钩与typescript，如果有人还需要它。

import React, { useEffect, useRef, useState } from "react";

export const useStateWithCallback = <T>(initialState: T): [state: T, setState: (updatedState: React.SetStateAction<T>, callback?: (updatedState: T) => void) => void] => {
    const [state, setState] = useState<T>(initialState);
    const callbackRef = useRef<(updated: T) => void>();

    const handleSetState = (updatedState: React.SetStateAction<T>, callback?: (updatedState: T) => void) => {
        callbackRef.current = callback;
        setState(updatedState);
    };

    useEffect(() => {
        if (typeof callbackRef.current === "function") {
            callbackRef.current(state);
            callbackRef.current = undefined;
        }
    }, [state]);

    return [state, handleSetState];
}

我们可以写一个叫做useScheduleNextRenderCallback的钩子，它返回一个“schedule”函数。在我们调用setState之后，我们可以调用“schedule”函数，传递一个我们希望在下次呈现时运行的回调。

import { useCallback, useEffect, useRef } from "react";

type ScheduledCallback = () => void;
export const useScheduleNextRenderCallback = () => {
  const ref = useRef<ScheduledCallback>();

  useEffect(() => {
    if (ref.current !== undefined) {
      ref.current();
      ref.current = undefined;
    }
  });

  const schedule = useCallback((fn: ScheduledCallback) => {
    ref.current = fn;
  }, []);

  return schedule;
};

使用示例:

const App = () => {
  const scheduleNextRenderCallback = useScheduleNextRenderCallback();

  const [state, setState] = useState(0);

  const onClick = useCallback(() => {
    setState(state => state + 1);
    scheduleNextRenderCallback(() => {
      console.log("next render");
    });
  }, []);

  return <button onClick={onClick}>click me to update state</button>;
};

简化的测试用例:https://stackblitz.com/edit/react-ts-rjd9jk

我有一个用例，我想做一个api调用与一些参数后的状态设置。我不想设置这些参数作为我的状态，所以我做了一个自定义钩子，这是我的解决方案

import { useState, useCallback, useRef, useEffect } from 'react';
import _isFunction from 'lodash/isFunction';
import _noop from 'lodash/noop';

export const useStateWithCallback = initialState => {
  const [state, setState] = useState(initialState);
  const callbackRef = useRef(_noop);

  const handleStateChange = useCallback((updatedState, callback) => {
    setState(updatedState);
    if (_isFunction(callback)) callbackRef.current = callback;
  }, []);

  useEffect(() => {
    callbackRef.current();
    callbackRef.current = _noop; // to clear the callback after it is executed
  }, [state]);

  return [state, handleStateChange];
};

我探索了use-state with-callback npm库和其他类似的自定义钩子，但最后我意识到我可以做这样的事情:

const [user, setUser] = React.useState(
  {firstName: 'joe', lastName: 'schmo'}
)

const handleFirstNameChange=(val)=> {
  const updatedUser = {
     ...user,
     firstName: val
  }
  setUser(updatedUser)
  updateDatabase(updatedUser)
}

我不认为用useRef区分挂载与否是一个好方法，不是一个更好的方法来确定useState()在useEffect()中生成的值是否为初始值?

const [val, setVal] = useState(null)

useEffect(() => {
  if (val === null) return
  console.log('not mounted, val updated', val)
}, [val])