我不认为用useRef区分挂载与否是一个好方法，不是一个更好的方法来确定useState()在useEffect()中生成的值是否为初始值?

const [val, setVal] = useState(null)

useEffect(() => {
  if (val === null) return
  console.log('not mounted, val updated', val)
}, [val])

您需要使用useEffect钩子来实现这一点。

const [counter, setCounter] = useState(0);

const doSomething = () => {
  setCounter(123);
}

useEffect(() => {
   console.log('Do something after counter has changed', counter);
}, [counter]);

如果你想在第一次初始渲染时忽略useEffect回调，那么相应地修改代码:

import React, { useEffect, useRef } from 'react';

const [counter, setCounter] = useState(0);
const didMount = useRef(false);

const doSomething = () => {
  setCounter(123);
}

useEffect(() => {
  // Return early, if this is the first render:
  if ( !didMount.current ) {
    return didMount.current = true;
  }
  // Paste code to be executed on subsequent renders:
  console.log('Do something after counter has changed', counter);
}, [counter]);

我探索了use-state with-callback npm库和其他类似的自定义钩子，但最后我意识到我可以做这样的事情:

const [user, setUser] = React.useState(
  {firstName: 'joe', lastName: 'schmo'}
)

const handleFirstNameChange=(val)=> {
  const updatedUser = {
     ...user,
     firstName: val
  }
  setUser(updatedUser)
  updateDatabase(updatedUser)
}

用useEffect模拟setState回调，只在状态更新时触发(不是初始状态):

const [state, setState] = useState({ name: "Michael" })
const isFirstRender = useRef(true)
useEffect(() => {
  if (isFirstRender.current) {
    isFirstRender.current = false // toggle flag after first render/mounting
    return;
  }
  console.log(state) // do something after state has updated
}, [state])

自定义钩子useEffectUpdate

function useEffectUpdate(callback) {
  const isFirstRender = useRef(true);
  useEffect(() => {
    if (isFirstRender.current) {
      isFirstRender.current = false; // toggle flag after first render/mounting
      return;
    }
    callback(); // performing action after state has updated
  }, [callback]);
}

// client usage, given some state dep
const cb = useCallback(() => { console.log(state) }, [state]); // memoize callback
useEffectUpdate(cb);

如果不需要异步更新状态，可以使用ref来保存值，而不是使用useState。

const name = useRef("John");
name.current = "Michael";
console.log(name.current); // will print "Michael" since updating the ref is not async

编辑

在这里使用promise似乎仍然推迟了重新渲染后的执行，两次触发setState可能是获得最新状态的最佳解决方案。因为setState将被列出，我们只需要在重新渲染之前获得prevState。

最初的发布

我刚刚弄清楚了我们是否可以在这里使用一个Promise让setState变成可等待的。

这是我的实验结果，感觉比使用回调更好

主要是在useEffect中触发解析函数

function useAsyncState(initialState) {
  const [state, setState] = useState(initialState)
  const resolveCb = useRef()

  const handleSetState = (updatedState) => new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
    // force previous promise resolved
    if (typeof resolveCb.current === 'function') {
      resolveCb.current(updatedState)
    }
    resolveCb.current = resolve
    try {
      setState(updatedState)
    } catch(err) {
      resolveCb.current = undefined
      reject(err)
    }
  })

  useEffect(() => {
    if (typeof resolveCb.current === 'function') {
      resolveCb.current(state)
      resolveCb.current = undefined
    }
  }, [state])

  return [state, handleSetState]
}

组件中使用

function App() {
  const [count, setCount] = useAsyncState(0)

  const increment = useMemoizedFn(async () => {
    const newCount = await setCount(count + 1)
    console.log(newCount)
  })

  console.log('rerender')

  return (
    <div>
      <h3 onClick={increment}>Hi, {count}</h3>
    </div>
  )
}