编辑

在这里使用promise似乎仍然推迟了重新渲染后的执行，两次触发setState可能是获得最新状态的最佳解决方案。因为setState将被列出，我们只需要在重新渲染之前获得prevState。

最初的发布

我刚刚弄清楚了我们是否可以在这里使用一个Promise让setState变成可等待的。

这是我的实验结果，感觉比使用回调更好

主要是在useEffect中触发解析函数

function useAsyncState(initialState) {
  const [state, setState] = useState(initialState)
  const resolveCb = useRef()

  const handleSetState = (updatedState) => new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
    // force previous promise resolved
    if (typeof resolveCb.current === 'function') {
      resolveCb.current(updatedState)
    }
    resolveCb.current = resolve
    try {
      setState(updatedState)
    } catch(err) {
      resolveCb.current = undefined
      reject(err)
    }
  })

  useEffect(() => {
    if (typeof resolveCb.current === 'function') {
      resolveCb.current(state)
      resolveCb.current = undefined
    }
  }, [state])

  return [state, handleSetState]
}

组件中使用

function App() {
  const [count, setCount] = useAsyncState(0)

  const increment = useMemoizedFn(async () => {
    const newCount = await setCount(count + 1)
    console.log(newCount)
  })

  console.log('rerender')

  return (
    <div>
      <h3 onClick={increment}>Hi, {count}</h3>
    </div>
  )
}

传递一个函数怎么样?

const [name, setName] = useState(initialName); 
...
setName(() => {
    const nextName = "Michael";
    console.log(nextName);
    return nextName;
  });

我们可以写一个叫做useScheduleNextRenderCallback的钩子，它返回一个“schedule”函数。在我们调用setState之后，我们可以调用“schedule”函数，传递一个我们希望在下次呈现时运行的回调。

import { useCallback, useEffect, useRef } from "react";

type ScheduledCallback = () => void;
export const useScheduleNextRenderCallback = () => {
  const ref = useRef<ScheduledCallback>();

  useEffect(() => {
    if (ref.current !== undefined) {
      ref.current();
      ref.current = undefined;
    }
  });

  const schedule = useCallback((fn: ScheduledCallback) => {
    ref.current = fn;
  }, []);

  return schedule;
};

使用示例:

const App = () => {
  const scheduleNextRenderCallback = useScheduleNextRenderCallback();

  const [state, setState] = useState(0);

  const onClick = useCallback(() => {
    setState(state => state + 1);
    scheduleNextRenderCallback(() => {
      console.log("next render");
    });
  }, []);

  return <button onClick={onClick}>click me to update state</button>;
};

简化的测试用例:https://stackblitz.com/edit/react-ts-rjd9jk

您需要使用useEffect钩子来实现这一点。

const [counter, setCounter] = useState(0);

const doSomething = () => {
  setCounter(123);
}

useEffect(() => {
   console.log('Do something after counter has changed', counter);
}, [counter]);

如果你想在第一次初始渲染时忽略useEffect回调，那么相应地修改代码:

import React, { useEffect, useRef } from 'react';

const [counter, setCounter] = useState(0);
const didMount = useRef(false);

const doSomething = () => {
  setCounter(123);
}

useEffect(() => {
  // Return early, if this is the first render:
  if ( !didMount.current ) {
    return didMount.current = true;
  }
  // Paste code to be executed on subsequent renders:
  console.log('Do something after counter has changed', counter);
}, [counter]);

编辑

在这里使用promise似乎仍然推迟了重新渲染后的执行，两次触发setState可能是获得最新状态的最佳解决方案。因为setState将被列出，我们只需要在重新渲染之前获得prevState。

最初的发布

我刚刚弄清楚了我们是否可以在这里使用一个Promise让setState变成可等待的。

这是我的实验结果，感觉比使用回调更好

主要是在useEffect中触发解析函数

function useAsyncState(initialState) {
  const [state, setState] = useState(initialState)
  const resolveCb = useRef()

  const handleSetState = (updatedState) => new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
    // force previous promise resolved
    if (typeof resolveCb.current === 'function') {
      resolveCb.current(updatedState)
    }
    resolveCb.current = resolve
    try {
      setState(updatedState)
    } catch(err) {
      resolveCb.current = undefined
      reject(err)
    }
  })

  useEffect(() => {
    if (typeof resolveCb.current === 'function') {
      resolveCb.current(state)
      resolveCb.current = undefined
    }
  }, [state])

  return [state, handleSetState]
}

组件中使用

function App() {
  const [count, setCount] = useAsyncState(0)

  const increment = useMemoizedFn(async () => {
    const newCount = await setCount(count + 1)
    console.log(newCount)
  })

  console.log('rerender')

  return (
    <div>
      <h3 onClick={increment}>Hi, {count}</h3>
    </div>
  )
}

我探索了use-state with-callback npm库和其他类似的自定义钩子，但最后我意识到我可以做这样的事情:

const [user, setUser] = React.useState(
  {firstName: 'joe', lastName: 'schmo'}
)

const handleFirstNameChange=(val)=> {
  const updatedUser = {
     ...user,
     firstName: val
  }
  setUser(updatedUser)
  updateDatabase(updatedUser)
}