我可能有一个像下面这样的数组:
[1, 4, 2, 2, 6, 24, 15, 2, 60, 15, 6]
或者,实际上,任何类似类型的数据部分的序列。我要做的是确保每个相同的元素只有一个。例如,上面的数组将变成:
[1, 4, 2, 6, 24, 15, 60]
请注意,删除了2、6和15的重复项,以确保每个相同的元素中只有一个。Swift是否提供了一种容易做到这一点的方法,还是我必须自己做?
我可能有一个像下面这样的数组:
[1, 4, 2, 2, 6, 24, 15, 2, 60, 15, 6]
或者,实际上,任何类似类型的数据部分的序列。我要做的是确保每个相同的元素只有一个。例如,上面的数组将变成:
[1, 4, 2, 6, 24, 15, 60]
请注意,删除了2、6和15的重复项,以确保每个相同的元素中只有一个。Swift是否提供了一种容易做到这一点的方法,还是我必须自己做?
当前回答
func removeDublicate (ab: [Int]) -> [Int] {
var answer1:[Int] = []
for i in ab {
if !answer1.contains(i) {
answer1.append(i)
}}
return answer1
}
用法:
let f = removeDublicate(ab: [1,2,2])
print(f)
其他回答
受https://www.swiftbysundell.com/posts/the-power-of-key-paths-in-swift的启发,我们可以声明一个更强大的工具,它能够过滤任何keyPath上的唯一性。感谢Alexander关于复杂性的各种答案的评论,下面的解决方案应该是最优的。
Non-mutating解决方案
我们扩展了一个函数,它可以过滤任意keyPath上的唯一性:
extension RangeReplaceableCollection {
/// Returns a collection containing, in order, the first instances of
/// elements of the sequence that compare equally for the keyPath.
func unique<T: Hashable>(for keyPath: KeyPath<Element, T>) -> Self {
var unique = Set<T>()
return filter { unique.insert($0[keyPath: keyPath]).inserted }
}
}
注意:在你的对象不符合RangeReplaceableCollection,但符合Sequence的情况下,你可以有这个额外的扩展,但返回类型将始终是一个数组:
extension Sequence {
/// Returns an array containing, in order, the first instances of
/// elements of the sequence that compare equally for the keyPath.
func unique<T: Hashable>(for keyPath: KeyPath<Element, T>) -> [Element] {
var unique = Set<T>()
return filter { unique.insert($0[keyPath: keyPath]).inserted }
}
}
使用
如果我们想要元素本身的唯一性,如问题中所示,我们使用keyPath \.self:
let a = [1, 4, 2, 2, 6, 24, 15, 2, 60, 15, 6]
let b = a.unique(for: \.self)
/* b is [1, 4, 2, 6, 24, 15, 60] */
如果我们想要其他东西的唯一性(比如对象集合的id),那么我们使用我们选择的keyPath:
let a = [CGPoint(x: 1, y: 1), CGPoint(x: 2, y: 1), CGPoint(x: 1, y: 2)]
let b = a.unique(for: \.y)
/* b is [{x 1 y 1}, {x 1 y 2}] */
变异的解决方案
我们扩展了一个变异函数,它能够过滤任意keyPath上的唯一性:
extension RangeReplaceableCollection {
/// Keeps only, in order, the first instances of
/// elements of the collection that compare equally for the keyPath.
mutating func uniqueInPlace<T: Hashable>(for keyPath: KeyPath<Element, T>) {
var unique = Set<T>()
removeAll { !unique.insert($0[keyPath: keyPath]).inserted }
}
}
使用
如果我们想要元素本身的唯一性,如问题中所示,我们使用keyPath \.self:
var a = [1, 4, 2, 2, 6, 24, 15, 2, 60, 15, 6]
a.uniqueInPlace(for: \.self)
/* a is [1, 4, 2, 6, 24, 15, 60] */
如果我们想要其他东西的唯一性(比如对象集合的id),那么我们使用我们选择的keyPath:
var a = [CGPoint(x: 1, y: 1), CGPoint(x: 2, y: 1), CGPoint(x: 1, y: 2)]
a.uniqueInPlace(for: \.y)
/* a is [{x 1 y 1}, {x 1 y 2}] */
从数组中删除重复项的简单方法
extension Array where Element: Equatable {
mutating func removeDuplicates() {
var result = [Element]()
for value in self {
if !result.contains(value) {
result.append(value)
}
}
self = result
}}
对于元素既不是哈希也不是可比的数组(例如复杂对象,字典或结构),这个扩展提供了一种通用的方法来删除重复:
extension Array
{
func filterDuplicate<T:Hashable>(_ keyValue:(Element)->T) -> [Element]
{
var uniqueKeys = Set<T>()
return filter{uniqueKeys.insert(keyValue($0)).inserted}
}
func filterDuplicate<T>(_ keyValue:(Element)->T) -> [Element]
{
return filterDuplicate{"\(keyValue($0))"}
}
}
// example usage: (for a unique combination of attributes):
peopleArray = peopleArray.filterDuplicate{ ($0.name, $0.age, $0.sex) }
or...
peopleArray = peopleArray.filterDuplicate{ "\(($0.name, $0.age, $0.sex))" }
您不必为使值可哈希而烦恼,它允许您使用不同的字段组合来实现惟一性。
注:对于更健壮的方法,请参阅下面评论中Coeur提出的解决方案。
stackoverflow.com/a/55684308/1033581
Swift 4的替代方案
在Swift 4.2中,你可以更容易地使用hash类来构建散列。上面的扩展可以改变,以利用这一点:
extension Array
{
func filterDuplicate(_ keyValue:((AnyHashable...)->AnyHashable,Element)->AnyHashable) -> [Element]
{
func makeHash(_ params:AnyHashable ...) -> AnyHashable
{
var hash = Hasher()
params.forEach{ hash.combine($0) }
return hash.finalize()
}
var uniqueKeys = Set<AnyHashable>()
return filter{uniqueKeys.insert(keyValue(makeHash,$0)).inserted}
}
}
调用语法略有不同,因为闭包接收了一个额外的参数,其中包含一个函数,用于散列可变数量的值(这些值必须是单独可散列的)
peopleArray = peopleArray.filterDuplicate{ $0($1.name, $1.age, $1.sex) }
它也可以使用单一唯一性值(使用$1而忽略$0)。
peopleArray = peopleArray.filterDuplicate{ $1.name }
这里我对对象做了O(n)解。不是少行解决方案,而是……
struct DistinctWrapper <T>: Hashable {
var underlyingObject: T
var distinctAttribute: String
var hashValue: Int {
return distinctAttribute.hashValue
}
}
func distinct<S : SequenceType, T where S.Generator.Element == T>(source: S,
distinctAttribute: (T) -> String,
resolution: (T, T) -> T) -> [T] {
let wrappers: [DistinctWrapper<T>] = source.map({
return DistinctWrapper(underlyingObject: $0, distinctAttribute: distinctAttribute($0))
})
var added = Set<DistinctWrapper<T>>()
for wrapper in wrappers {
if let indexOfExisting = added.indexOf(wrapper) {
let old = added[indexOfExisting]
let winner = resolution(old.underlyingObject, wrapper.underlyingObject)
added.insert(DistinctWrapper(underlyingObject: winner, distinctAttribute: distinctAttribute(winner)))
} else {
added.insert(wrapper)
}
}
return Array(added).map( { return $0.underlyingObject } )
}
func == <T>(lhs: DistinctWrapper<T>, rhs: DistinctWrapper<T>) -> Bool {
return lhs.hashValue == rhs.hashValue
}
// tests
// case : perhaps we want to get distinct addressbook list which may contain duplicated contacts like Irma and Irma Burgess with same phone numbers
// solution : definitely we want to exclude Irma and keep Irma Burgess
class Person {
var name: String
var phoneNumber: String
init(_ name: String, _ phoneNumber: String) {
self.name = name
self.phoneNumber = phoneNumber
}
}
let persons: [Person] = [Person("Irma Burgess", "11-22-33"), Person("Lester Davidson", "44-66-22"), Person("Irma", "11-22-33")]
let distinctPersons = distinct(persons,
distinctAttribute: { (person: Person) -> String in
return person.phoneNumber
},
resolution:
{ (p1, p2) -> Person in
return p1.name.characters.count > p2.name.characters.count ? p1 : p2
}
)
// distinctPersons contains ("Irma Burgess", "11-22-33") and ("Lester Davidson", "44-66-22")
我的解决方案,它似乎可以在O(n)时间,因为哈希映射访问是O(1),过滤器是O(n)。它还使用by闭包来选择按顺序区分元素的属性。
extension Sequence {
func distinct<T: Hashable>(by: (Element) -> T) -> [Element] {
var seen: [T: Bool] = [:]
return self.filter { seen.updateValue(true, forKey: by($0)) == nil }
}
}