我有一个名为hello world的字符串
我需要把"world"换成" chsharp "
我用:
string.Replace("World", "csharp");
但结果是,字符串没有被替换。原因在于区分大小写。原来的字符串包含“世界”,而我试图取代“世界”。
有没有办法避免字符串中的这种区分大小写的情况?替代方法?
我有一个名为hello world的字符串
我需要把"world"换成" chsharp "
我用:
string.Replace("World", "csharp");
但结果是,字符串没有被替换。原因在于区分大小写。原来的字符串包含“世界”,而我试图取代“世界”。
有没有办法避免字符串中的这种区分大小写的情况?替代方法?
当前回答
使用这个,测试和100%工作!
VB。网
Dim myString As String
Dim oldValue As String
Dim newValue As String
myString = Form1.TextBox1.Text
oldValue = TextBox1.Text
newValue = TextBox2.Text
Dim working As String = myString
Dim index As Integer = working.IndexOf(oldValue, StringComparison.CurrentCultureIgnoreCase)
While index <> -1
working = working.Remove(index, oldValue.Length)
working = working.Insert(index, newValue)
index = index + newValue.Length
index = working.IndexOf(oldValue, index, StringComparison.CurrentCultureIgnoreCase)
Form1.TextBox1.Text = working
End While
为c#
private void Button2_Click(System.Object sender, System.EventArgs e)
{
string myString;
string oldValue;
string newValue;
myString = Form1.TextBox1.Text;
oldValue = TextBox1.Text;
newValue = TextBox2.Text;
string working = myString;
int index = working.IndexOf(oldValue, StringComparison.CurrentCultureIgnoreCase);
while (index != -1)
{
working = working.Remove(index, oldValue.Length);
working = working.Insert(index, newValue);
index = index + newValue.Length;
index = working.IndexOf(oldValue, index, StringComparison.CurrentCultureIgnoreCase);
Form1.TextBox1.Text = working;
}
}
其他回答
var search = "world";
var replacement = "csharp";
string result = Regex.Replace(
stringToLookInto,
Regex.Escape(search),
replacement.Replace("$","$$"),
RegexOptions.IgnoreCase
);
正则表达式。如果您依赖于可能包含Regex语言元素的用户输入,那么Escape是有用的
更新
多亏了注释,您实际上不必转义替换字符串。
下面是一个测试代码的小工具:
using System;
using System.Text.RegularExpressions;
public class Program
{
public static void Main()
{
var tests = new[] {
new { Input="abcdef", Search="abc", Replacement="xyz", Expected="xyzdef" },
new { Input="ABCdef", Search="abc", Replacement="xyz", Expected="xyzdef" },
new { Input="A*BCdef", Search="a*bc", Replacement="xyz", Expected="xyzdef" },
new { Input="abcdef", Search="abc", Replacement="x*yz", Expected="x*yzdef" },
new { Input="abcdef", Search="abc", Replacement="$", Expected="$def" },
};
foreach(var test in tests){
var result = ReplaceCaseInsensitive(test.Input, test.Search, test.Replacement);
Console.WriteLine(
"Success: {0}, Actual: {1}, {2}",
result == test.Expected,
result,
test
);
}
}
private static string ReplaceCaseInsensitive(string input, string search, string replacement){
string result = Regex.Replace(
input,
Regex.Escape(search),
replacement.Replace("$","$$"),
RegexOptions.IgnoreCase
);
return result;
}
}
它的输出是:
Success: True, Actual: xyzdef, { Input = abcdef, Search = abc, Replacement = xyz, Expected = xyzdef }
Success: True, Actual: xyzdef, { Input = ABCdef, Search = abc, Replacement = xyz, Expected = xyzdef }
Success: True, Actual: xyzdef, { Input = A*BCdef, Search = a*bc, Replacement = xyz, Expected = xyzdef }
Success: True, Actual: x*yzdef, { Input = abcdef, Search = abc, Replacement = x*yz, Expected = x*yzdef}
Success: True, Actual: $def, { Input = abcdef, Search = abc, Replacement = $, Expected = $def }
(编辑:没有意识到“裸链接”的问题,对不起)
从这里开始:
string myString = "find Me and replace ME";
string strReplace = "me";
myString = Regex.Replace(myString, "me", strReplace, RegexOptions.IgnoreCase);
似乎你不是第一个抱怨字符串不区分大小写的人。
这样不行吗?我想象不出还有什么比这更快更简单的方法了。
public static class ExtensionMethodsString
{
public static string Replace(this String thisString, string oldValue, string newValue, StringComparison stringComparison)
{
string working = thisString;
int index = working.IndexOf(oldValue, stringComparison);
while (index != -1)
{
working = working.Remove(index, oldValue.Length);
working = working.Insert(index, newValue);
index = index + newValue.Length;
index = working.IndexOf(oldValue, index, stringComparison);
}
return working;
}
}
您还可以尝试Regex类。
var regex = new regex ("camel", RegexOptions. var regex = new regex。IgnoreCase); var newSentence =正则表达式。替换(句子,“马”);
2.5倍比其他正则表达式方法更快和最有效的方法:
/// <summary>
/// Returns a new string in which all occurrences of a specified string in the current instance are replaced with another
/// specified string according the type of search to use for the specified string.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="str">The string performing the replace method.</param>
/// <param name="oldValue">The string to be replaced.</param>
/// <param name="newValue">The string replace all occurrences of <paramref name="oldValue"/>.
/// If value is equal to <c>null</c>, than all occurrences of <paramref name="oldValue"/> will be removed from the <paramref name="str"/>.</param>
/// <param name="comparisonType">One of the enumeration values that specifies the rules for the search.</param>
/// <returns>A string that is equivalent to the current string except that all instances of <paramref name="oldValue"/> are replaced with <paramref name="newValue"/>.
/// If <paramref name="oldValue"/> is not found in the current instance, the method returns the current instance unchanged.</returns>
[DebuggerStepThrough]
public static string Replace(this string str,
string oldValue, string newValue,
StringComparison comparisonType)
{
// Check inputs.
if (str == null)
{
// Same as original .NET C# string.Replace behavior.
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(str));
}
if (str.Length == 0)
{
// Same as original .NET C# string.Replace behavior.
return str;
}
if (oldValue == null)
{
// Same as original .NET C# string.Replace behavior.
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(oldValue));
}
if (oldValue.Length == 0)
{
// Same as original .NET C# string.Replace behavior.
throw new ArgumentException("String cannot be of zero length.");
}
//if (oldValue.Equals(newValue, comparisonType))
//{
//This condition has no sense
//It will prevent method from replacesing: "Example", "ExAmPlE", "EXAMPLE" to "example"
//return str;
//}
// Prepare string builder for storing the processed string.
// Note: StringBuilder has a better performance than String by 30-40%.
StringBuilder resultStringBuilder = new StringBuilder(str.Length);
// Analyze the replacement: replace or remove.
bool isReplacementNullOrEmpty = string.IsNullOrEmpty(newValue);
// Replace all values.
const int valueNotFound = -1;
int foundAt;
int startSearchFromIndex = 0;
while ((foundAt = str.IndexOf(oldValue, startSearchFromIndex, comparisonType)) != valueNotFound)
{
// Append all characters until the found replacement.
int charsUntilReplacment = foundAt - startSearchFromIndex;
bool isNothingToAppend = charsUntilReplacment == 0;
if (!isNothingToAppend)
{
resultStringBuilder.Append(str, startSearchFromIndex, charsUntilReplacment);
}
// Process the replacement.
if (!isReplacementNullOrEmpty)
{
resultStringBuilder.Append(newValue);
}
// Prepare start index for the next search.
// This needed to prevent infinite loop, otherwise method always start search
// from the start of the string. For example: if an oldValue == "EXAMPLE", newValue == "example"
// and comparisonType == "any ignore case" will conquer to replacing:
// "EXAMPLE" to "example" to "example" to "example" … infinite loop.
startSearchFromIndex = foundAt + oldValue.Length;
if (startSearchFromIndex == str.Length)
{
// It is end of the input string: no more space for the next search.
// The input string ends with a value that has already been replaced.
// Therefore, the string builder with the result is complete and no further action is required.
return resultStringBuilder.ToString();
}
}
// Append the last part to the result.
int charsUntilStringEnd = str.Length - startSearchFromIndex;
resultStringBuilder.Append(str, startSearchFromIndex, charsUntilStringEnd);
return resultStringBuilder.ToString();
}
注意:忽略case == StringComparison。OrdinalIgnoreCase作为stringcomparisontype的参数。它是替换所有值的最快、不区分大小写的方法。
该方法的优点:
High CPU and MEMORY efficiency; It is the fastest solution, 2.5 times faster than other's methods with regular expressions (proof in the end); Suitable for removing parts from the input string (set newValue to null), optimized for this; Same as original .NET C# string.Replace behavior, same exceptions; Well commented, easy to understand; Simpler – no regular expressions. Regular expressions are always slower because of their versatility (even compiled); This method is well tested and there are no hidden flaws like infinite loop in other's solutions, even highly rated:
@AsValeO: Not适用于Regex语言元素,所以它不是 普遍的方法
这段代码有问题。如果文本为new 是文本的超集,这样可以产生无限循环。
防基准测试:这个解决方案比@Steve B.的regex快2.59倍,代码:
// Results:
// 1/2. Regular expression solution: 4486 milliseconds
// 2/2. Current solution: 1727 milliseconds — 2.59X times FASTER! than regex!
// Notes: the test was started 5 times, the result is an average; release build.
const int benchmarkIterations = 1000000;
const string sourceString = "aaaaddsdsdsdsdsd";
const string oldValue = "D";
const string newValue = "Fod";
long totalLenght = 0;
Stopwatch regexStopwatch = Stopwatch.StartNew();
string tempString1;
for (int i = 0; i < benchmarkIterations; i++)
{
tempString1 = sourceString;
tempString1 = ReplaceCaseInsensitive(tempString1, oldValue, newValue);
totalLenght = totalLenght + tempString1.Length;
}
regexStopwatch.Stop();
Stopwatch currentSolutionStopwatch = Stopwatch.StartNew();
string tempString2;
for (int i = 0; i < benchmarkIterations; i++)
{
tempString2 = sourceString;
tempString2 = tempString2.Replace(oldValue, newValue,
StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase);
totalLenght = totalLenght + tempString2.Length;
}
currentSolutionStopwatch.Stop();
原创创意- @Darky711;感谢@ miner的StringBuilder。