是否有充分的理由说明在函数中只有一个return语句是一个更好的实践?
或者在逻辑上正确的情况下,可以从函数中返回,这意味着函数中可能有许多返回语句?
是否有充分的理由说明在函数中只有一个return语句是一个更好的实践?
或者在逻辑上正确的情况下,可以从函数中返回,这意味着函数中可能有许多返回语句?
当前回答
我想说的是,你应该有尽可能多的需要,或者任何使代码更干净的(如保护子句)。
我个人从来没有听过/见过任何“最佳实践”说你应该只有一个返回语句。
在大多数情况下,我倾向于根据逻辑路径尽快退出函数(保护子句就是一个很好的例子)。
其他回答
不,因为我们不再生活在20世纪70年代了。如果你的函数足够长以至于多次返回都是个问题,那么它就太长了。
(除了语言中有异常的任何多行函数都会有多个退出点这一事实。)
I've seen it in coding standards for C++ that were a hang-over from C, as if you don't have RAII or other automatic memory management then you have to clean up for each return, which either means cut-and-paste of the clean-up or a goto (logically the same as 'finally' in managed languages), both of which are considered bad form. If your practices are to use smart pointers and collections in C++ or another automatic memory system, then there isn't a strong reason for it, and it become all about readability, and more of a judgement call.
使用单个出口点确实在调试中提供了优势,因为它允许您在函数的末尾设置单个断点,以查看实际将返回的值。
我想说,武断地决定不使用多个出口点是非常不明智的,因为我发现这种技术在实践中一次又一次地有用,事实上,为了清晰起见,我经常将现有的代码重构为多个出口点。我们可以这样比较这两种方法:-
string fooBar(string s, int? i) {
string ret = "";
if(!string.IsNullOrEmpty(s) && i != null) {
var res = someFunction(s, i);
bool passed = true;
foreach(var r in res) {
if(!r.Passed) {
passed = false;
break;
}
}
if(passed) {
// Rest of code...
}
}
return ret;
}
将此与允许多个出口点的代码进行比较
string fooBar(string s, int? i) {
var ret = "";
if(string.IsNullOrEmpty(s) || i == null) return null;
var res = someFunction(s, i);
foreach(var r in res) {
if(!r.Passed) return null;
}
// Rest of code...
return ret;
}
我认为后者要清楚得多。据我所知,现在对多个退出点的批评是一种相当过时的观点。
Well, maybe I'm one of the few people here old enough to remember one of the big reasons why "only one return statement" was pushed so hard. It's so the compiler can emit more efficient code. For each function call, the compiler typically pushes some registers on the stack to preserve their values. This way, the function can use those registers for temporary storage. When the function returns, those saved registers have to be popped off the stack and back into the registers. That's one POP (or MOV -(SP),Rn) instruction per register. If you have a bunch of return statements, then either each one has to pop all the registers (which makes the compiled code bigger) or the compiler has to keep track of which registers might have been modified and only pop those (decreasing code size, but increasing compilation time).
今天仍然坚持使用一个return语句的一个原因是易于自动重构。如果您的IDE支持方法提取重构(选择一系列行并将它们转换为一个方法),那么如果您想提取的行中有一个return语句,特别是如果您正在返回一个值,则很难做到这一点。