下面使用Haskell对我来说似乎很自然。在树的各个层次上递归迭代(这里我将名字收集到一个大的有序字符串中，以显示树的路径):

data Node = Node {name :: String, children :: [Node]}
aTree = Node "r" [Node "c1" [Node "gc1" [Node "ggc1" []], Node "gc2" []] , Node "c2" [Node "gc3" []], Node "c3" [] ]
breadthFirstOrder x = levelRecurser [x]
    where levelRecurser level = if length level == 0
                                then ""
                                else concat [name node ++ " " | node <- level] ++ levelRecurser (concat [children node | node <- level])

下面使用Haskell对我来说似乎很自然。在树的各个层次上递归迭代(这里我将名字收集到一个大的有序字符串中，以显示树的路径):

data Node = Node {name :: String, children :: [Node]}
aTree = Node "r" [Node "c1" [Node "gc1" [Node "ggc1" []], Node "gc2" []] , Node "c2" [Node "gc3" []], Node "c3" [] ]
breadthFirstOrder x = levelRecurser [x]
    where levelRecurser level = if length level == 0
                                then ""
                                else concat [name node ++ " " | node <- level] ++ levelRecurser (concat [children node | node <- level])

(我假设这只是某种思维练习，或者甚至是一个恶作剧的家庭作业/面试问题，但是我想我可以想象一些奇怪的场景，由于某种原因不允许有任何堆空间[一些非常糟糕的自定义内存管理器?一些奇怪的运行时/操作系统问题?当你仍然可以访问堆栈时…)

宽度优先遍历传统上使用队列，而不是堆栈。队列和堆栈的性质几乎是相反的，因此试图使用调用堆栈(这是一个堆栈，因此得名)作为辅助存储(队列)几乎是注定要失败的，除非您对调用堆栈做了一些不应该做的愚蠢可笑的事情。

同样，您尝试实现的任何非尾递归本质上都是向算法添加堆栈。这使得它不再在二叉树上进行广度优先搜索，因此传统BFS的运行时和诸如此类的东西不再完全适用。当然，您总是可以简单地将任何循环转换为递归调用，但这并不是任何有意义的递归。

However, there are ways, as demonstrated by others, to implement something that follows the semantics of BFS at some cost. If the cost of comparison is expensive but node traversal is cheap, then as @Simon Buchan did, you can simply run an iterative depth-first search, only processing the leaves. This would mean no growing queue stored in the heap, just a local depth variable, and stacks being built up over and over on the call stack as the tree is traversed over and over again. And as @Patrick noted, a binary tree backed by an array is typically stored in breadth-first traversal order anyway, so a breadth-first search on that would be trivial, also without needing an auxiliary queue.

下面是简短的Scala解决方案:

  def bfs(nodes: List[Node]): List[Node] = {
    if (nodes.nonEmpty) {
      nodes ++ bfs(nodes.flatMap(_.children))
    } else {
      List.empty
    }
  }

使用返回值作为累加器的想法是很适合的。 可以在其他语言中以类似的方式实现，只需确保您的递归函数处理的节点列表。

测试代码清单(使用@marco测试树):

import org.scalatest.FlatSpec

import scala.collection.mutable

class Node(val value: Int) {

  private val _children: mutable.ArrayBuffer[Node] = mutable.ArrayBuffer.empty

  def add(child: Node): Unit = _children += child

  def children = _children.toList

  override def toString: String = s"$value"
}

class BfsTestScala extends FlatSpec {

  //            1
  //          / | \
  //        2   3   4
  //      / |       | \
  //    5   6       7  8
  //  / |           | \
  // 9  10         11  12
  def tree(): Node = {
    val root = new Node(1)
    root.add(new Node(2))
    root.add(new Node(3))
    root.add(new Node(4))
    root.children(0).add(new Node(5))
    root.children(0).add(new Node(6))
    root.children(2).add(new Node(7))
    root.children(2).add(new Node(8))
    root.children(0).children(0).add(new Node(9))
    root.children(0).children(0).add(new Node(10))
    root.children(2).children(0).add(new Node(11))
    root.children(2).children(0).add(new Node(12))
    root
  }

  def bfs(nodes: List[Node]): List[Node] = {
    if (nodes.nonEmpty) {
      nodes ++ bfs(nodes.flatMap(_.children))
    } else {
      List.empty
    }
  }

  "BFS" should "work" in {
    println(bfs(List(tree())))
  }
}

输出:

List(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12)

下面的方法使用DFS算法来获取特定深度的所有节点——这与对该级别进行BFS相同。如果您找到树的深度，并对所有级别执行此操作，结果将与BFS相同。

public void PrintLevelNodes(Tree root, int level) {
    if (root != null) {
        if (level == 0) {
            Console.Write(root.Data);
            return;
        }
        PrintLevelNodes(root.Left, level - 1);
        PrintLevelNodes(root.Right, level - 1);
    }
}

for (int i = 0; i < depth; i++) {
    PrintLevelNodes(root, i);
}

找到树的深度是小菜一碟:

public int MaxDepth(Tree root) {
    if (root == null) {
        return 0;
    } else {
        return Math.Max(MaxDepth(root.Left), MaxDepth(root.Right)) + 1;
    }
}

在学习AlgoExpert时，对这个问题进行了改编。提示符中已经提供了以下Class。这里是python中的迭代和递归解决方案。这个问题的目标是返回一个输出数组，其中列出了按访问顺序排列的节点名称。如果遍历顺序为A -> B -> D -> F，则输出为['A'，'B'，'D'，'F']

class Node:
    def __init__(self, name):
        self.children = []
        self.name = name

    def addChild(self, name):
        self.children.append(Node(name))
        return self

递归

def breadthFirstSearch(self, array):
    return self._bfs(array, [self])
    
def _bfs(self, array, visited):

    # Base case - no more nodes to visit
    if len(visited) == 0:
        return array

    node = visited.pop(0)
    array.append(node.name)
    visited.extend(node.children)
    return self._bfs(array, visited)

迭代

def breadthFirstSearch(self, array):
    array.append(self.name)
    queue = [self]
    while len(queue) > 0:
        node = queue.pop(0)
        for child in node.children:
            array.append(child.name)
            queue.append(child)
    return array