将清单大致等份的最佳方法是什么?例如，如果列表有7个元素，并将其分为2部分，我们希望其中一部分有3个元素，而另一部分应该有4个元素。
我正在寻找类似even_split(L, n)的东西，它将L分解为n部分。
def chunks(L, n):
""" Yield successive n-sized chunks from L.
"""
for i in range(0, len(L), n):
yield L[i:i+n]
上面的代码给出了3个块，而不是3个块。我可以简单地转置(遍历这个，取每列的第一个元素，称之为第一部分，然后取第二个元素，把它放在第二部分，等等)，但这破坏了项目的顺序。
当前回答
在这种情况下，我自己编写了代码:
def chunk_ports(port_start, port_end, portions):
if port_end < port_start:
return None
total = port_end - port_start + 1
fractions = int(math.floor(float(total) / portions))
results = []
# No enough to chuck.
if fractions < 1:
return None
# Reverse, so any additional items would be in the first range.
_e = port_end
for i in range(portions, 0, -1):
print "i", i
if i == 1:
_s = port_start
else:
_s = _e - fractions + 1
results.append((_s, _e))
_e = _s - 1
results.reverse()
return results
Divide_ports(1,10,9)将返回
[(1, 2), (3, 3), (4, 4), (5, 5), (6, 6), (7, 7), (8, 8), (9, 9), (10, 10)]
其他回答
看看numpy.split:
>>> a = numpy.array([1,2,3,4])
>>> numpy.split(a, 2)
[array([1, 2]), array([3, 4])]
def chunkify(target_list, chunk_size):
return [target_list[i:i+chunk_size] for i in range(0, len(target_list), chunk_size)]
>>> l = [5432, 432, 67, "fdas", True, True, False, (4324,131), 876, "ofsa", 8, 909, b'765']
>>> print(chunkify(l, 3))
>>> [[5432, 432, 67], ['fdas', True, True], [False, (4324, 131), 876], ['ofsa', 8, 909], [b'765']]
def chunk_array(array : List, n: int) -> List[List]:
chunk_size = len(array) // n
chunks = []
i = 0
while i < len(array):
# if less than chunk_size left add the remainder to last element
if len(array) - (i + chunk_size + 1) < 0:
chunks[-1].append(*array[i:i + chunk_size])
break
else:
chunks.append(array[i:i + chunk_size])
i += chunk_size
return chunks
这是我的版本(灵感来自Max)
另一种方法是这样的，这里的想法是用石斑鱼，但要去掉None。在本例中，所有的'small_parts'都由列表第一部分的元素组成，'larger_parts'则由列表的后一部分组成。' bigger parts'的长度为len(small_parts) + 1。我们需要把x看成两个不同的子部分。
from itertools import izip_longest
import numpy as np
def grouper(n, iterable, fillvalue=None): # This is grouper from itertools
"grouper(3, 'ABCDEFG', 'x') --> ABC DEF Gxx"
args = [iter(iterable)] * n
return izip_longest(fillvalue=fillvalue, *args)
def another_chunk(x,num):
extra_ele = len(x)%num #gives number of parts that will have an extra element
small_part = int(np.floor(len(x)/num)) #gives number of elements in a small part
new_x = list(grouper(small_part,x[:small_part*(num-extra_ele)]))
new_x.extend(list(grouper(small_part+1,x[small_part*(num-extra_ele):])))
return new_x
我设置它的方式返回一个元组列表:
>>> x = range(14)
>>> another_chunk(x,3)
[(0, 1, 2, 3), (4, 5, 6, 7, 8), (9, 10, 11, 12, 13)]
>>> another_chunk(x,4)
[(0, 1, 2), (3, 4, 5), (6, 7, 8, 9), (10, 11, 12, 13)]
>>> another_chunk(x,5)
[(0, 1), (2, 3, 4), (5, 6, 7), (8, 9, 10), (11, 12, 13)]
>>>
这里有一个生成器，可以处理任何正(整数)数量的块。如果块的数量大于输入列表的长度，一些块将为空。该算法在短块和长块之间交替，而不是将它们分开。
我还包含了一些用于测试ragged_chunks函数的代码。
''' Split a list into "ragged" chunks
The size of each chunk is either the floor or ceiling of len(seq) / chunks
chunks can be > len(seq), in which case there will be empty chunks
Written by PM 2Ring 2017.03.30
'''
def ragged_chunks(seq, chunks):
size = len(seq)
start = 0
for i in range(1, chunks + 1):
stop = i * size // chunks
yield seq[start:stop]
start = stop
# test
def test_ragged_chunks(maxsize):
for size in range(0, maxsize):
seq = list(range(size))
for chunks in range(1, size + 1):
minwidth = size // chunks
#ceiling division
maxwidth = -(-size // chunks)
a = list(ragged_chunks(seq, chunks))
sizes = [len(u) for u in a]
deltas = all(minwidth <= u <= maxwidth for u in sizes)
assert all((sum(a, []) == seq, sum(sizes) == size, deltas))
return True
if test_ragged_chunks(100):
print('ok')
我们可以通过将乘法导出到range调用中来稍微提高效率，但我认为以前的版本更易于阅读(和dry)。
def ragged_chunks(seq, chunks):
size = len(seq)
start = 0
for i in range(size, size * chunks + 1, size):
stop = i // chunks
yield seq[start:stop]
start = stop
