Java有一个方便的分割方法:
String str = "The quick brown fox";
String[] results = str.split(" ");
在c++中有简单的方法来做到这一点吗?
Java有一个方便的分割方法:
String str = "The quick brown fox";
String[] results = str.split(" ");
在c++中有简单的方法来做到这一点吗?
当前回答
下面是一种方法,允许您控制是否包含空标记(如strsep)或排除空标记(如strtok)。
#include <string.h> // for strchr and strlen
/*
* want_empty_tokens==true : include empty tokens, like strsep()
* want_empty_tokens==false : exclude empty tokens, like strtok()
*/
std::vector<std::string> tokenize(const char* src,
char delim,
bool want_empty_tokens)
{
std::vector<std::string> tokens;
if (src and *src != '\0') // defensive
while( true ) {
const char* d = strchr(src, delim);
size_t len = (d)? d-src : strlen(src);
if (len or want_empty_tokens)
tokens.push_back( std::string(src, len) ); // capture token
if (d) src += len+1; else break;
}
return tokens;
}
其他回答
Adam Pierce的回答提供了一个采用const char*的手工标记器。使用迭代器会有一些问题,因为对字符串的结束迭代器进行递增是未定义的。也就是说,给定字符串str{"The quick brown fox"},我们当然可以做到:
auto start = find(cbegin(str), cend(str), ' ');
vector<string> tokens{ string(cbegin(str), start) };
while (start != cend(str)) {
const auto finish = find(++start, cend(str), ' ');
tokens.push_back(string(start, finish));
start = finish;
}
生活的例子
如果你想通过使用标准功能来抽象复杂性,On Freund建议strtok是一个简单的选择:
vector<string> tokens;
for (auto i = strtok(data(str), " "); i != nullptr; i = strtok(nullptr, " ")) tokens.push_back(i);
如果你不能访问c++ 17,你需要像这个例子一样替换data(str): http://ideone.com/8kAGoa
虽然在示例中没有演示,但strtok不需要为每个标记使用相同的分隔符。除了这个优势,还有几个缺点:
strtok cannot be used on multiple strings at the same time: Either a nullptr must be passed to continue tokenizing the current string or a new char* to tokenize must be passed (there are some non-standard implementations which do support this however, such as: strtok_s) For the same reason strtok cannot be used on multiple threads simultaneously (this may however be implementation defined, for example: Visual Studio's implementation is thread safe) Calling strtok modifies the string it is operating on, so it cannot be used on const strings, const char*s, or literal strings, to tokenize any of these with strtok or to operate on a string who's contents need to be preserved, str would have to be copied, then the copy could be operated on
c++20为我们提供了split_view来以非破坏性的方式标记字符串:https://topanswers.xyz/cplusplus?q=749#a874
前面的方法不能就地生成标记化的向量,这意味着如果不将它们抽象为辅助函数,它们就不能初始化const vector<string>令牌。该功能和接受任何空白分隔符的能力可以使用istream_iterator来利用。例如,给定const string str{"The quick \tbrown \nfox"},我们可以这样做:
istringstream is{ str };
const vector<string> tokens{ istream_iterator<string>(is), istream_iterator<string>() };
生活的例子
对于这个选项,需要构造一个istringstream的代价比前面两个选项要大得多,但是这个代价通常隐藏在字符串分配的代价中。
如果上面的选项都不够灵活,不能满足您的标记化需求,那么最灵活的选项是使用regex_token_iterator,当然这种灵活性会带来更大的开销,但同样,这可能隐藏在字符串分配成本中。例如,我们想要基于非转义的逗号进行标记化,也吃空白,给定以下输入:const string str{" the,qu\\,ick,\tbrown, fox"}我们可以这样做:
const regex re{ "\\s*((?:[^\\\\,]|\\\\.)*?)\\s*(?:,|$)" };
const vector<string> tokens{ sregex_token_iterator(cbegin(str), cend(str), re, 1), sregex_token_iterator() };
生活的例子
另一种快速方法是使用getline。喜欢的东西:
stringstream ss("bla bla");
string s;
while (getline(ss, s, ' ')) {
cout << s << endl;
}
如果需要,可以创建一个简单的split()方法,返回vector<string>,即 真的有用。
我为自己编写了一个https://stackoverflow.com/a/50247503/3976739的简化版本(可能有一点效率)。我希望这能有所帮助。
void StrTokenizer(string& source, const char* delimiter, vector<string>& Tokens)
{
size_t new_index = 0;
size_t old_index = 0;
while (new_index != std::string::npos)
{
new_index = source.find(delimiter, old_index);
Tokens.emplace_back(source.substr(old_index, new_index-old_index));
if (new_index != std::string::npos)
old_index = ++new_index;
}
}
我只是看了所有的答案,找不到下一个前提条件的解决方案:
没有动态内存分配 不使用boost 不使用正则表达式 c++17标准
这就是我的解
#include <iomanip>
#include <iostream>
#include <iterator>
#include <string_view>
#include <utility>
struct split_by_spaces
{
std::string_view text;
static constexpr char delim = ' ';
struct iterator
{
const std::string_view& text;
std::size_t cur_pos;
std::size_t end_pos;
std::string_view operator*() const
{
return { &text[cur_pos], end_pos - cur_pos };
}
bool operator==(const iterator& other) const
{
return cur_pos == other.cur_pos && end_pos == other.end_pos;
}
bool operator!=(const iterator& other) const
{
return !(*this == other);
}
iterator& operator++()
{
cur_pos = text.find_first_not_of(delim, end_pos);
if (cur_pos == std::string_view::npos)
{
cur_pos = text.size();
end_pos = cur_pos;
return *this;
}
end_pos = text.find(delim, cur_pos);
if (cur_pos == std::string_view::npos)
{
end_pos = text.size();
}
return *this;
}
};
[[nodiscard]] iterator begin() const
{
auto start = text.find_first_not_of(delim);
if (start == std::string_view::npos)
{
return iterator{ text, text.size(), text.size() };
}
auto end_word = text.find(delim, start);
if (end_word == std::string_view::npos)
{
end_word = text.size();
}
return iterator{ text, start, end_word };
}
[[nodiscard]] iterator end() const
{
return iterator{ text, text.size(), text.size() };
}
};
int main(int argc, char** argv)
{
using namespace std::literals;
auto str = " there should be no memory allocation during parsing"
" into words this line and you should'n create any"
" contaner for intermediate words "sv;
auto comma = "";
for (std::string_view word : split_by_spaces{ str })
{
std::cout << std::exchange(comma, ",") << std::quoted(word);
}
auto only_spaces = " "sv;
for (std::string_view word : split_by_spaces{ only_spaces })
{
std::cout << "you will not see this line in output" << std::endl;
}
}
你可以利用boost::make_find_iterator。类似于这个:
template<typename CH>
inline vector< basic_string<CH> > tokenize(
const basic_string<CH> &Input,
const basic_string<CH> &Delimiter,
bool remove_empty_token
) {
typedef typename basic_string<CH>::const_iterator string_iterator_t;
typedef boost::find_iterator< string_iterator_t > string_find_iterator_t;
vector< basic_string<CH> > Result;
string_iterator_t it = Input.begin();
string_iterator_t it_end = Input.end();
for(string_find_iterator_t i = boost::make_find_iterator(Input, boost::first_finder(Delimiter, boost::is_equal()));
i != string_find_iterator_t();
++i) {
if(remove_empty_token){
if(it != i->begin())
Result.push_back(basic_string<CH>(it,i->begin()));
}
else
Result.push_back(basic_string<CH>(it,i->begin()));
it = i->end();
}
if(it != it_end)
Result.push_back(basic_string<CH>(it,it_end));
return Result;
}