封装和抽象之间的确切区别是什么?
当前回答
我读得越多，就越困惑。所以，我的理解是:
封装:
我们通常从外面看到手表，它的组件被封装在它的身体里。我们对不同的操作有某种控制。这种隐藏细节和公开控制(例如设置时间)的方式就是封装。
抽象:
到目前为止，我们一直在谈论手表。但我们没有具体说明是哪种手表。可以是数字的，也可以是模拟的，可以是手用的，也可以是墙用的。有很多可能性。我们所知道的是，这是一块手表，它显示时间，这是我们唯一感兴趣的东西，时间。这种隐藏细节和公开通用特性或用例的方法就是抽象。
其他回答
我认为封装是实现抽象的一种方式。看看下面的链接。
抽象和封装
封装:对对象的实际用户隐藏不需要的/不期望的/适当的实现细节。 如。
List<string> list = new List<string>();
list.Sort(); /* Here, which sorting algorithm is used and hows its
implemented is not useful to the user who wants to perform sort, that's
why its hidden from the user of list. */
抽象:是一种提供泛化的方法，因此是处理大量不同对象的通用方法。如。
class Aeroplane : IFlyable, IFuelable, IMachine
{ // Aeroplane's Design says:
// Aeroplane is a flying object
// Aeroplane can be fueled
// Aeroplane is a Machine
}
// But the code related to Pilot, or Driver of Aeroplane is not bothered
// about Machine or Fuel. Hence,
// pilot code:
IFlyable flyingObj = new Aeroplane();
flyingObj.Fly();
// fighter Pilot related code
IFlyable flyingObj2 = new FighterAeroplane();
flyingObj2.Fly();
// UFO related code
IFlyable ufoObj = new UFO();
ufoObj.Fly();
// **All the 3 Above codes are genaralized using IFlyable,
// Interface Abstraction**
// Fly related code knows how to fly, irrespective of the type of
// flying object they are.
// Similarly, Fuel related code:
// Fueling an Aeroplane
IFuelable fuelableObj = new Aeroplane();
fuelableObj.FillFuel();
// Fueling a Car
IFuelable fuelableObj2 = new Car(); // class Car : IFuelable { }
fuelableObj2.FillFuel();
// ** Fueling code does not need know what kind of vehicle it is, so far
// as it can Fill Fuel**
抽象:以一种简化的/不同的方式来呈现事物的想法，这种方式要么更容易理解和使用，要么更切合实际。
考虑一个发送电子邮件的类……它使用抽象来向你展示自己作为某种信使，所以你可以调用emailSender。发送(邮件,收件人)。它的实际功能——选择POP3 / SMTP、调用服务器、MIME转换等等，都被抽象了出来。你只看到你的信使。
封装:保护和隐藏对象私有的数据和方法的思想。它更多的是让某样东西独立且万无一失。
以我为例。我把我的心率从世界其他地方压缩起来。因为我不希望其他人改变这个变量，我也不需要其他人来设置它来让我运行。它对我来说至关重要，但你不需要知道它是什么，而且你可能根本不在乎。
环顾四周，您会发现几乎所有您接触到的东西都是抽象和封装的例子。例如，你的手机向你展示了一种抽象的功能，它能把你说的话传达给别人——掩盖了GSM、处理器架构、无线电频率以及其他无数你不理解或不关心的东西。它还封装了来自您的某些数据，如序列号、ID号、频率等。
这一切都使世界成为一个更美好的居住地
抽象是广义的术语。即封装是抽象的子集。
| Abstraction | Encapsulation |
|---|---|
| It solves an issue at the design level. | Encapsulation solves an issue at implementation level. |
| hides the unnecessary detail but shows the essential information. | It hides the code and data into a single entity or unit so that the data can be protected from the outside world. |
| Focuses on the external lookout. | Focuses on internal working. |
| Lets focus on what an object does instead of how it does it. | Lets focus on how an object does something. |
| Example: Outer look of mobile, like it has a display screen and buttons. | Example: Inner details of mobile, how button and display screen connect with each other using circuits. |
示例:解决方案架构师是创建整个解决方案的高级抽象技术设计的人，然后将该设计移交给开发团队进行实现。 在这里，解决方案架构师充当抽象，而开发团队充当封装。
举例:用户数据的封装(组网)
图片由
Abstraction (or modularity) – Types enable programmers to think at a higher level than the bit or byte, not bothering with low-level implementation. For example, programmers can begin to think of a string as a set of character values instead of as a mere array of bytes. Higher still, types enable programmers to think about and express interfaces between two of any-sized subsystems. This enables more levels of localization so that the definitions required for interoperability of the subsystems remain consistent when those two subsystems communicate. Source
Java示例
让我们以堆栈为例。它可以使用数组或链表来实现。但它支持的操作是推送和弹出。
Now abstraction is exposing only the interfaces push and pop. The underlying representation is hidden (is it an array or a linked list?) and a well-defined interface is provided. Now how do you ensure that no accidental access is made to the abstracted data? That is where encapsulation comes in. For example, classes in C++ use the access specifiers which ensure that accidental access and modification is prevented. And also, by making the above-mentioned interfaces as public, it ensures that the only way to manipulate the stack is through the well-defined interface. In the process, it has coupled the data and the code that can manipulate it (let's not get the friend functions involved here). That is, the code and data are bonded together or tied or encapsulated.
