这基本上是因为它是一个“可选的额外项目”。许多人选择c++而不是Java和c#等语言，这样他们可以更好地控制编译器的输出，例如，一个更小和/或更快的程序。

如果您选择添加反射，有各种可用的解决方案。

所有的语言都不应该试图融合其他语言的所有特征。

c++本质上是一个非常非常复杂的宏汇编器。它不是(传统意义上的)c#、Java、Objective-C、Smalltalk等高级语言。

对于不同的工作有不同的工具是很好的。如果我们只有锤子，所有东西看起来都像钉子。拥有脚本语言对于某些作业是有用的，而具有反射性的oo语言(Java, Obj-C, c#)对于另一类作业是有用的，而超级高效的基本的接近机器的语言对于另一类作业是有用的(c++， C, Assembler)。

C++ does an amazing job of extending Assembler technology to incredible levels of complexity management, and abstractions to make programming larger, more complex tasks vastly more possible for human beings. But it is not necessarily a language that is the best suited for those who are approaching their problem from a strictly high-level perspective (Lisp, Smalltalk, Java, C#). If you need a language with those features to best implement a solution to your problems, then thank those who've created such languages for all of us to use!

但c++是为那些出于某种原因，需要在代码和底层机器操作之间建立强相关性的人准备的。无论是它的效率，还是编程设备驱动程序，还是与底层操作系统服务的交互，或者其他什么，c++都更适合这些任务。

C#, Java, Objective-C all require a much larger, richer runtime system to support their execution. That runtime has to be delivered to the system in question - preinstalled to support the operation of your software. And that layer has to be maintained for various target systems, customized by SOME OTHER LANGUAGE to make it work on that platform. And that middle layer - that adaptive layer between the host OS and the your code - the runtime, is almost always written in a language like C or C++ where efficiency is #1, where understanding predictably the exact interaction between software and hardware can be well understood, and manipulated to maximum gain.

我喜欢Smalltalk、Objective-C，以及拥有一个包含反射、元数据、垃圾收集等的丰富运行时系统。可以编写令人惊叹的代码来利用这些设施!但这只是堆栈上的一个更高的层，它必须依赖于更低的层，而这些层最终必须依赖于操作系统和硬件。我们总是需要一种最适合构建这一层的语言:c++ /C/Assembler。

Addendum: C++11/14 are continuing to expand C++ ability to support higher-level abstractions and systems. Threading, synchronization, precise memory models, more precise abstract machine definitions are enabling C++ developers to achieve many of the high-level abstractions that some of these high-level only languages used to have exclusive domain over, while continuing to provide close-to-metal performance and excellent predictability (i.e minimal runtime subsystems). Perhaps reflection facilities will be selectively enabled in a future revision of C++, for those who want it - or perhaps a library will provide such runtime services (maybe there is one now, or the beginnings of one in boost?).

Reflection requires some metadata about types to be stored somewhere that can be queried. Since C++ compiles to native machine code and undergoes heavy changes due to optimization, high level view of the application is pretty much lost in the process of compilation, consequently, it won't be possible to query them at run time. Java and .NET use a very high level representation in the binary code for virtual machines making this level of reflection possible. In some C++ implementations, however, there is something called Run Time Type Information (RTTI) which can be considered a stripped down version of reflection.

反射可以在c++中实现，并且已经在c++中实现过。

它不是原生的c++特性，因为它有一个沉重的成本(内存和速度)，不应该由语言默认设置——语言是“默认最大性能”导向的。

因为你不应该为你不需要的东西付钱，而且正如你自己所说，编辑器比其他应用程序更需要它，那么它应该只在你需要的地方实现，而不是“强制”到所有的代码中(你不需要对你将在编辑器或其他类似应用程序中使用的所有数据进行反思)。

在c++中使用反射的情况有很多，而使用模板元编程等编译时结构无法充分解决这些问题。

N3340建议用富指针作为c++中引入反射的一种方式。除此之外，它还解决了一个问题，那就是除非你使用某个功能，否则就不用为它付费。

c++是一种不需要反射的语言，因为c++是一种可以用来编写具有反射的语言的语言。