我如何在。map中跳过数组元素?

我的代码:

var sources = images.map(function (img) {
    if(img.src.split('.').pop() === "json"){ // if extension is .json
        return null; // skip
    }
    else{
        return img.src;
    }
});

这将返回:

["img.png", null, "img.png"]

当前回答

TLDR:你可以先过滤你的数组,然后执行你的映射,但这将需要对数组进行两次传递(过滤器返回一个数组映射)。因为这个数组很小,所以它的性能代价非常小。你也可以做简单的减法。然而,如果你想重新想象如何通过对数组(或任何数据类型)的一次传递来实现这一点,你可以使用Rich Hickey流行的“传感器”思想。

答:

我们不应该要求增加点链并对数组[]进行操作。map(fn1).filter(f2)…因为这种方法在内存中为每个约简函数创建中间数组。

最好的方法是对实际的约简函数进行操作,因此只有一次数据传递,没有额外的数组。

reduce函数是传递给reduce的函数,它接受累加器并从源函数输入,然后返回类似累加器的东西

// 1. create a concat reducing function that can be passed into `reduce`
const concat = (acc, input) => acc.concat([input])

// note that [1,2,3].reduce(concat, []) would return [1,2,3]

// transforming your reducing function by mapping
// 2. create a generic mapping function that can take a reducing function and return another reducing function
const mapping = (changeInput) => (reducing) => (acc, input) => reducing(acc, changeInput(input))

// 3. create your map function that operates on an input
const getSrc = (x) => x.src
const mappingSrc = mapping(getSrc)

// 4. now we can use our `mapSrc` function to transform our original function `concat` to get another reducing function
const inputSources = [{src:'one.html'}, {src:'two.txt'}, {src:'three.json'}]
inputSources.reduce(mappingSrc(concat), [])
// -> ['one.html', 'two.txt', 'three.json']

// remember this is really essentially just
// inputSources.reduce((acc, x) => acc.concat([x.src]), [])


// transforming your reducing function by filtering
// 5. create a generic filtering function that can take a reducing function and return another reducing function
const filtering = (predicate) => (reducing) => (acc, input) => (predicate(input) ? reducing(acc, input): acc)

// 6. create your filter function that operate on an input
const filterJsonAndLoad = (img) => {
  console.log(img)
  if(img.src.split('.').pop() === 'json') {
    // game.loadSprite(...);
    return false;
  } else {
    return true;
  }
}
const filteringJson = filtering(filterJsonAndLoad)

// 7. notice the type of input and output of these functions
// concat is a reducing function,
// mapSrc transforms and returns a reducing function
// filterJsonAndLoad transforms and returns a reducing function
// these functions that transform reducing functions are "transducers", termed by Rich Hickey
// source: http://clojure.com/blog/2012/05/15/anatomy-of-reducer.html
// we can pass this all into reduce! and without any intermediate arrays

const sources = inputSources.reduce(filteringJson(mappingSrc(concat)), []);
// [ 'one.html', 'two.txt' ]

// ==================================
// 8. BONUS: compose all the functions
// You can decide to create a composing function which takes an infinite number of transducers to
// operate on your reducing function to compose a computed accumulator without ever creating that
// intermediate array
const composeAll = (...args) => (x) => {
  const fns = args
  var i = fns.length
  while (i--) {
    x = fns[i].call(this, x);
  }
  return x
}

const doABunchOfStuff = composeAll(
    filtering((x) => x.src.split('.').pop() !== 'json'),
    mapping((x) => x.src),
    mapping((x) => x.toUpperCase()),
    mapping((x) => x + '!!!')
)

const sources2 = inputSources.reduce(doABunchOfStuff(concat), [])
// ['ONE.HTML!!!', 'TWO.TXT!!!']

资源:丰富的吻痕传感器后

其他回答

你可以像这样使用map + filter:

   var sources = images.map(function (img) {
    if(img.src.split('.').pop() === "json"){ // if extension is .json
        return null; // skip
    }
    else{
        return img.src;
    }})?.filter(x => x !== null);

从2019年开始,Array.prototype.flatMap是一个很好的选择。

images.flatMap(({src}) => src.endsWith('.json') ? [] : src);

中数:

flatMap可以作为一种添加和删除项目的方法(修改 项目数目)在一个地图。换句话说,它允许您进行映射 多项对多项(通过分别处理每个输入项), 而不是总是一对一。在这个意义上,它就像 filter的反义词。只需返回一个1元素的数组来保存该项, 用于添加项的多元素数组,或用于删除项的0元素数组 的项目。

我使用foreach():

var sources = [];

images.forEach(function (img) {
    if(img.src.split('.').pop() !== "json"){ // if extension is .json
        sources.push(img);
    }
});

注:我否定了你的逻辑。

回答无多余的边缘情况:

const thingsWithoutNulls = things.reduce((acc, thing) => {
  if (thing !== null) {
    acc.push(thing);
  }
  return acc;
}, [])

为什么不直接使用forEach循环?

Let arr = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e']; Let filtered = []; 加勒比海盗。forEach(x => { If (!x.includes('b')) filter .push(x); }); console.log(过滤)/ /过滤= = = [' a ', ' c ', ' d ', ' e '];

或者更简单的使用过滤器:

const arr = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e'];
const filtered = arr.filter(x => !x.includes('b')); // ['a','c','d','e'];