在c#中合并2个或更多字典(Dictionary<TKey, TValue>)的最佳方法是什么?
(像LINQ这样的3.0特性就可以了)。
我正在考虑一个方法签名,如下所示:
public static Dictionary<TKey,TValue>
Merge<TKey,TValue>(Dictionary<TKey,TValue>[] dictionaries);
or
public static Dictionary<TKey,TValue>
Merge<TKey,TValue>(IEnumerable<Dictionary<TKey,TValue>> dictionaries);
关于重复键的处理:在发生冲突的情况下,保存到字典中的值并不重要,只要它是一致的。
选项1:这取决于在确定两个字典中都没有重复键的情况下想要发生什么。比你能做的:
var result = dictionary1.Union(dictionary2).ToDictionary(k => k.Key, v => v.Value)
注意:如果在字典中获得任何重复的键,将抛出错误。
选项2:如果你可以有重复的键,那么你必须使用where子句来处理重复的键。
var result = dictionary1.Union(dictionary2.Where(k => !dictionary1.ContainsKey(k.Key))).ToDictionary(k => k.Key, v => v.Value)
注意:它不会得到重复的密钥。如果有任何重复的键,那么它将获得dictionary1的键。
选项3:如果你想使用ToLookup。然后您将得到一个查找,每个键可以有多个值。你可以把这个查找转换成一个字典:
var result = dictionaries.SelectMany(dict => dict)
.ToLookup(pair => pair.Key, pair => pair.Value)
.ToDictionary(group => group.Key, group => group.First());
如果有多个键(“右”键取代“左”键),这不会爆炸,可以合并一些字典(如果需要),并保留类型(限制它需要一个有意义的默认公共构造函数):
public static class DictionaryExtensions
{
// Works in C#3/VS2008:
// Returns a new dictionary of this ... others merged leftward.
// Keeps the type of 'this', which must be default-instantiable.
// Example:
// result = map.MergeLeft(other1, other2, ...)
public static T MergeLeft<T,K,V>(this T me, params IDictionary<K,V>[] others)
where T : IDictionary<K,V>, new()
{
T newMap = new T();
foreach (IDictionary<K,V> src in
(new List<IDictionary<K,V>> { me }).Concat(others)) {
// ^-- echk. Not quite there type-system.
foreach (KeyValuePair<K,V> p in src) {
newMap[p.Key] = p.Value;
}
}
return newMap;
}
}
基于上面的答案,但添加一个Func-parameter,让调用者处理重复:
public static Dictionary<TKey, TValue> Merge<TKey, TValue>(this IEnumerable<Dictionary<TKey, TValue>> dicts,
Func<IGrouping<TKey, TValue>, TValue> resolveDuplicates)
{
if (resolveDuplicates == null)
resolveDuplicates = new Func<IGrouping<TKey, TValue>, TValue>(group => group.First());
return dicts.SelectMany<Dictionary<TKey, TValue>, KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue>>(dict => dict)
.ToLookup(pair => pair.Key, pair => pair.Value)
.ToDictionary(group => group.Key, group => resolveDuplicates(group));
}
这个聚会现在几乎已经死了,但是user166390的“改进”版本已经进入了我的扩展库。
除了一些细节之外,我还添加了一个委托来计算合并的值。
/// <summary>
/// Merges a dictionary against an array of other dictionaries.
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="TResult">The type of the resulting dictionary.</typeparam>
/// <typeparam name="TKey">The type of the key in the resulting dictionary.</typeparam>
/// <typeparam name="TValue">The type of the value in the resulting dictionary.</typeparam>
/// <param name="source">The source dictionary.</param>
/// <param name="mergeBehavior">A delegate returning the merged value. (Parameters in order: The current key, The current value, The previous value)</param>
/// <param name="mergers">Dictionaries to merge against.</param>
/// <returns>The merged dictionary.</returns>
public static TResult MergeLeft<TResult, TKey, TValue>(
this TResult source,
Func<TKey, TValue, TValue, TValue> mergeBehavior,
params IDictionary<TKey, TValue>[] mergers)
where TResult : IDictionary<TKey, TValue>, new()
{
var result = new TResult();
var sources = new List<IDictionary<TKey, TValue>> { source }
.Concat(mergers);
foreach (var kv in sources.SelectMany(src => src))
{
TValue previousValue;
result.TryGetValue(kv.Key, out previousValue);
result[kv.Key] = mergeBehavior(kv.Key, kv.Value, previousValue);
}
return result;
}
or :
public static IDictionary<TKey, TValue> Merge<TKey, TValue>( IDictionary<TKey, TValue> x, IDictionary<TKey, TValue> y)
{
return x
.Except(x.Join(y, z => z.Key, z => z.Key, (a, b) => a))
.Concat(y)
.ToDictionary(z => z.Key, z => z.Value);
}
结果是一个联合,对于重复的条目,“y”胜出。