enum Suit: String {
case spades = "♠"
case hearts = "♥"
case diamonds = "♦"
case clubs = "♣"
}
例如,我怎么做这样的事情:
for suit in Suit {
// do something with suit
print(suit.rawValue)
}
结果示例:
♠
♥
♦
♣
enum Suit: String {
case spades = "♠"
case hearts = "♥"
case diamonds = "♦"
case clubs = "♣"
}
例如,我怎么做这样的事情:
for suit in Suit {
// do something with suit
print(suit.rawValue)
}
结果示例:
♠
♥
♦
♣
当前回答
更新代码:Swift 4.2/Swift 5
enum Suit: String, CaseIterable {
case spades = "♠"
case hearts = "♥"
case diamonds = "♦"
case clubs = "♣"
}
按问题访问输出:
for suitKey in Suit.allCases {
print(suitKey.rawValue)
}
输出:
♠
♥
♦
♣
CaseIterable:提供其所有值的集合。 符合CaseIterable协议的类型通常是没有关联值的枚举。当使用CaseIterable类型时,您可以通过使用该类型的allCases属性访问该类型的所有案例的集合。
对于访问case,我们使用。allcases。更多信息请点击https://developer.apple.com/documentation/swift/caseiterable
其他回答
这是一个相当老的帖子,来自Swift 2.0。现在有一些更好的解决方案,使用了swift 3.0的新特性: 在Swift 3.0中迭代一个Enum
关于这个问题,有一个解决方案,它使用了Swift 4.2的一个新功能(在我写这篇编辑时还没有发布): 我如何得到一个Swift枚举的计数?
在这个帖子中有很多好的解决方案,但其中一些非常复杂。我喜欢尽可能地简化。这里有一个解决方案,可能适用于不同的需求,但我认为它在大多数情况下都很好:
enum Number: String {
case One
case Two
case Three
case Four
case EndIndex
func nextCase () -> Number
{
switch self {
case .One:
return .Two
case .Two:
return .Three
case .Three:
return .Four
case .Four:
return .EndIndex
/*
Add all additional cases above
*/
case .EndIndex:
return .EndIndex
}
}
static var allValues: [String] {
var array: [String] = Array()
var number = Number.One
while number != Number.EndIndex {
array.append(number.rawValue)
number = number.nextCase()
}
return array
}
}
迭代:
for item in Number.allValues {
print("number is: \(item)")
}
原则上,如果你不为enum的大小写使用原始值赋值,这样做是可能的:
enum RankEnum: Int {
case Ace
case One
case Two
}
class RankEnumGenerator: Generator {
var i = 0
typealias Element = RankEnum
func next() -> Element? {
let r = RankEnum.fromRaw(i)
i += 1
return r
}
}
extension RankEnum {
static func enumerate() -> SequenceOf<RankEnum> {
return SequenceOf<RankEnum>({ RankEnumGenerator() })
}
}
for r in RankEnum.enumerate() {
println("\(r.toRaw())")
}
Swift 4 + 2。
从Swift 4.2 (Xcode 10)开始,只需将协议一致性添加到CaseIterable中,就可以从allCases中受益。要添加这个协议一致性,你只需要在某个地方写:
extension Suit: CaseIterable {}
如果枚举是你自己的,你可以直接在声明中指定一致性:
enum Suit: String, CaseIterable { case spades = "♠"; case hearts = "♥"; case diamonds = "♦"; case clubs = "♣" }
然后下面的代码将打印所有可能的值:
Suit.allCases.forEach {
print($0.rawValue)
}
与早期Swift版本的兼容性(3。X和4.x)
如果您需要支持Swift 3。x或4.0,你可以通过添加以下代码来模仿Swift 4.2的实现:
#if !swift(>=4.2)
public protocol CaseIterable {
associatedtype AllCases: Collection where AllCases.Element == Self
static var allCases: AllCases { get }
}
extension CaseIterable where Self: Hashable {
static var allCases: [Self] {
return [Self](AnySequence { () -> AnyIterator<Self> in
var raw = 0
var first: Self?
return AnyIterator {
let current = withUnsafeBytes(of: &raw) { $0.load(as: Self.self) }
if raw == 0 {
first = current
} else if current == first {
return nil
}
raw += 1
return current
}
})
}
}
#endif
该解决方案在可读性和可维护性之间取得了适当的平衡。
struct Card {
// ...
static func deck() -> Card[] {
var deck = Card[]()
for rank in Rank.Ace.toRaw()...Rank.King.toRaw() {
for suit in [Suit.Spades, .Hearts, .Clubs, .Diamonds] {
let card = Card(rank: Rank.fromRaw(rank)!, suit: suit)
deck.append(card)
}
}
return deck
}
}
let deck = Card.deck()
我发现了一种有点俗气但更安全的方法,它不需要键入两次值或引用枚举值的内存,因此不太可能损坏。
基本上,与其使用枚举,不如创建一个具有单个实例的结构体,并将所有enum-values设置为常量。然后可以使用Mirror查询变量
public struct Suit{
// the values
let spades = "♠"
let hearts = "♥"
let diamonds = "♦"
let clubs = "♣"
// make a single instance of the Suit struct, Suit.instance
struct SStruct{static var instance: Suit = Suit()}
static var instance : Suit{
get{return SStruct.instance}
set{SStruct.instance = newValue}
}
// an array with all of the raw values
static var allValues: [String]{
var values = [String]()
let mirror = Mirror(reflecting: Suit.instance)
for (_, v) in mirror.children{
guard let suit = v as? String else{continue}
values.append(suit)
}
return values
}
}
如果使用此方法,则需要使用Suit.instance.clubs或Suit.instance.spades来获取单个值
但所有这些都太无聊了……让我们做一些事情,使它更像一个真正的enum!
public struct SuitType{
// store multiple things for each suit
let spades = Suit("♠", order: 4)
let hearts = Suit("♥", order: 3)
let diamonds = Suit("♦", order: 2)
let clubs = Suit("♣", order: 1)
struct SStruct{static var instance: SuitType = SuitType()}
static var instance : SuitType{
get{return SStruct.instance}
set{SStruct.instance = newValue}
}
// a dictionary mapping the raw values to the values
static var allValuesDictionary: [String : Suit]{
var values = [String : Suit]()
let mirror = Mirror(reflecting: SuitType.instance)
for (_, v) in mirror.children{
guard let suit = v as? Suit else{continue}
values[suit.rawValue] = suit
}
return values
}
}
public struct Suit: RawRepresentable, Hashable{
public var rawValue: String
public typealias RawValue = String
public var hashValue: Int{
// find some integer that can be used to uniquely identify
// each value. In this case, we could have used the order
// variable because it is a unique value, yet to make this
// apply to more cases, the hash table address of rawValue
// will be returned, which should work in almost all cases
//
// you could also add a hashValue parameter to init() and
// give each suit a different hash value
return rawValue.hash
}
public var order: Int
public init(_ value: String, order: Int){
self.rawValue = value
self.order = order
}
// an array of all of the Suit values
static var allValues: [Suit]{
var values = [Suit]()
let mirror = Mirror(reflecting: SuitType.instance)
for (_, v) in mirror.children{
guard let suit = v as? Suit else{continue}
values.append(suit)
}
return values
}
// allows for using Suit(rawValue: "♦"), like a normal enum
public init?(rawValue: String){
// get the Suit from allValuesDictionary in SuitType, or return nil if that raw value doesn't exist
guard let suit = SuitType.allValuesDictionary[rawValue] else{return nil}
// initialize a new Suit with the same properties as that with the same raw value
self.init(suit.rawValue, order: suit.order)
}
}
你现在可以做
let allSuits: [Suit] = Suit.allValues
or
for suit in Suit.allValues{
print("The suit \(suit.rawValue) has the order \(suit.order)")
}
然而,要获得一个单一,你仍然需要使用SuitType.instance.spades或SuitType.instance.hearts。为了更加直观,您可以向Suit添加一些允许您使用Suit.type的代码。*而不是SuitType.instance.*
public struct Suit: RawRepresentable, Hashable{
// ...your code...
static var type = SuitType.instance
// ...more of your code...
}
您现在可以使用Suit.type.diamonds而不是SuitType.instance。diamonds,或者Suit.type.clubs而不是SuitType.instance.clubs