其他的解决方法都是可行的，但它们都假设了可能的等级和花色的数量，或者第一和最后的等级是什么。的确，在可预见的未来，一副纸牌的布局可能不会有太大变化。然而，一般来说，编写尽可能少假设的代码会更简洁。我的解决方案:

我已经在Suit枚举中添加了一个原始类型，所以我可以使用Suit(rawValue:)来访问Suit案例:

enum Suit: Int {
    case Spades = 1
    case Hearts, Diamonds, Clubs
    func simpleDescription() -> String {
        switch self {
            case .Spades:
                return "spades"
            case .Hearts:
                return "hearts"
            case .Diamonds:
                return "diamonds"
            case .Clubs:
                return "clubs"
        }
    }
    func color() -> String {
        switch self {
        case .Spades:
            return "black"
        case .Clubs:
            return "black"
        case .Diamonds:
            return "red"
        case .Hearts:
            return "red"
        }
    }
}

enum Rank: Int {
    case Ace = 1
    case Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, Seven, Eight, Nine, Ten
    case Jack, Queen, King
    func simpleDescription() -> String {
        switch self {
            case .Ace:
                return "ace"
            case .Jack:
                return "jack"
            case .Queen:
                return "queen"
            case .King:
                return "king"
            default:
                return String(self.rawValue)
        }
    }
}

在Card的createDeck()方法实现的下面。init(rawValue:)是一个可失败的初始化式，返回一个可选值。通过在两个while语句中展开并检查它的值，不需要假设Rank或Suit情况的数量:

struct Card {
    var rank: Rank
    var suit: Suit
    func simpleDescription() -> String {
        return "The \(rank.simpleDescription()) of \(suit.simpleDescription())"
    }
    func createDeck() -> [Card] {
        var n = 1
        var deck = [Card]()
        while let rank = Rank(rawValue: n) {
            var m = 1
            while let suit = Suit(rawValue: m) {
                deck.append(Card(rank: rank, suit: suit))
                m += 1
            }
            n += 1
        }
        return deck
    }
}

下面是如何调用createDeck方法:

let card = Card(rank: Rank.Ace, suit: Suit.Clubs)
let deck = card.createDeck()

我发现自己在代码中经常使用. allvalues。我终于找到了一种方法来简单地遵循Iteratable协议并拥有一个rawValues()方法。

protocol Iteratable {}
extension RawRepresentable where Self: RawRepresentable {

    static func iterateEnum<T: Hashable>(_: T.Type) -> AnyIterator<T> {
        var i = 0
        return AnyIterator {
            let next = withUnsafePointer(to: &i) {
                $0.withMemoryRebound(to: T.self, capacity: 1) { $0.pointee }
            }
            if next.hashValue != i { return nil }
            i += 1
            return next
        }
    }
}

extension Iteratable where Self: RawRepresentable, Self: Hashable {
    static func hashValues() -> AnyIterator<Self> {
        return iterateEnum(self)
    }

    static func rawValues() -> [Self.RawValue] {
        return hashValues().map({$0.rawValue})
    }
}


// Example
enum Grocery: String, Iteratable {
    case Kroger = "kroger"
    case HEB = "h.e.b."
    case Randalls = "randalls"
}

let groceryHashes = Grocery.hashValues() // AnyIterator<Grocery>
let groceryRawValues = Grocery.rawValues() // ["kroger", "h.e.b.", "randalls"]

这个问题现在简单多了。以下是我的Swift 4.2解决方案:

enum Suit: Int, CaseIterable {
  case None
  case Spade, Heart, Diamond, Club

  static let allNonNullCases = Suit.allCases[Spade.rawValue...]
}

enum Rank: Int, CaseIterable {
  case Joker
  case Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, Seven, Eight
  case Nine, Ten, Jack, Queen, King, Ace

  static let allNonNullCases = Rank.allCases[Two.rawValue...]
}

func makeDeck(withJoker: Bool = false) -> [Card] {
  var deck = [Card]()
  for suit in Suit.allNonNullCases {
    for rank in Rank.allNonNullCases {
      deck.append(Card(suit: suit, rank: rank))
    }
  }
  if withJoker {
    deck.append(Card(suit: .None, rank: .Joker))
  }
  return deck
}

4。2:

我喜欢这个解决方案，我把找到“列表理解在Swift”。

它使用Int rawws而不是string，但它避免了键入两次，它允许自定义范围，并且不硬编码原始值。

这是我最初解决方案的Swift 4版本，但请参阅上面的4.2改进:

enum Suit: Int {
  case None
  case Spade, Heart, Diamond, Club

  static let allRawValues = Suit.Spade.rawValue...Suit.Club.rawValue
  static let allCases = Array(allRawValues.map{ Suit(rawValue: $0)! })
}
enum Rank: Int {
  case Joker
  case Two, Three, Four, Five, Six
  case Seven, Eight, Nine, Ten
  case Jack, Queen, King, Ace

  static let allRawValues = Rank.Two.rawValue...Rank.Ace.rawValue
  static let allCases = Array(allRawValues.map{ Rank(rawValue: $0)! })
}
func makeDeck(withJoker: Bool = false) -> [Card] {
  var deck = [Card]()
  for suit in Suit.allCases {
    for rank in Rank.allCases {
      deck.append(Card(suit: suit, rank: rank))
    }
  }
  if withJoker {
    deck.append(Card(suit: .None, rank: .Joker))
  }
  return deck
}

我创建了一个实用函数iterateEnum()，用于迭代任意枚举类型的情况。

下面是示例用法:

enum Suit: String {
    case Spades = "♠"
    case Hearts = "♥"
    case Diamonds = "♦"
    case Clubs = "♣"
}

for f in iterateEnum(Suit) {
    println(f.rawValue)
}

输出:

♠
♥
♦
♣

但是，这仅用于调试或测试目的:这依赖于几个未记录的Swift1.1编译器行为，因此，使用它的风险由您自己承担。

代码如下:

func iterateEnum<T: Hashable>(_: T.Type) -> GeneratorOf<T> {
    var cast: (Int -> T)!
    switch sizeof(T) {
        case 0: return GeneratorOf(GeneratorOfOne(unsafeBitCast((), T.self)))
        case 1: cast = { unsafeBitCast(UInt8(truncatingBitPattern: $0), T.self) }
        case 2: cast = { unsafeBitCast(UInt16(truncatingBitPattern: $0), T.self) }
        case 4: cast = { unsafeBitCast(UInt32(truncatingBitPattern: $0), T.self) }
        case 8: cast = { unsafeBitCast(UInt64($0), T.self) }
        default: fatalError("cannot be here")
    }

    var i = 0
    return GeneratorOf {
        let next = cast(i)
        return next.hashValue == i++ ? next : nil
    }
}

其基本思想是:

枚举的内存表示，不包括有关联类型的枚举，只是一个案例的索引，当案例的计数是2…256，它和UInt8是一样的，当257…65536，它是UInt16等等。因此，它可以是unsafeBitcast对应的无符号整数类型。 枚举值的. hashvalue与case的索引相同。 从无效索引位转换的枚举值的. hashvalue为0。

为Swift2修改，并从@Kametrixom的回答中实现了选角想法:

func iterateEnum<T: Hashable>(_: T.Type) -> AnyGenerator<T> {
    var i = 0
    return anyGenerator {
        let next = withUnsafePointer(&i) { UnsafePointer<T>($0).memory }
        return next.hashValue == i++ ? next : nil
    }
}

对Swift3的修订:

func iterateEnum<T: Hashable>(_: T.Type) -> AnyIterator<T> {
    var i = 0
    return AnyIterator {
        let next = withUnsafePointer(to: &i) {
            $0.withMemoryRebound(to: T.self, capacity: 1) { $0.pointee }
        }
        if next.hashValue != i { return nil }
        i += 1
        return next
    }
}

针对Swift3.0.1修订:

func iterateEnum<T: Hashable>(_: T.Type) -> AnyIterator<T> {
    var i = 0
    return AnyIterator {
        let next = withUnsafeBytes(of: &i) { $0.load(as: T.self) }
        if next.hashValue != i { return nil }
        i += 1
        return next
    }
}

(改进Karthik Kumar的回答)

这个解决方案是使用编译器来保证你不会错过一个case。

enum Suit: String {
    case spades = "♠"
    case hearts = "♥"
    case diamonds = "♦"
    case clubs = "♣"

    static var enumerate: [Suit] {
        switch Suit.spades {
        // make sure the two lines are identical ^_^
        case        .spades, .hearts, .diamonds, .clubs:
            return [.spades, .hearts, .diamonds, .clubs]
        }
    }
}

该解决方案在可读性和可维护性之间取得了适当的平衡。

struct Card {

    // ...

    static func deck() -> Card[] {
        var deck = Card[]()
        for rank in Rank.Ace.toRaw()...Rank.King.toRaw() {
            for suit in [Suit.Spades, .Hearts, .Clubs, .Diamonds] {
                let card = Card(rank: Rank.fromRaw(rank)!, suit: suit)
                deck.append(card)
            }
        }
    return deck
    }
}

let deck = Card.deck()