我在filter-descriptor.interface.d.ts文件中的@progress/kendo-data-query中找到了一个例子

检查程序

declare const isCompositeFilterDescriptor: (source: FilterDescriptor | CompositeFilterDescriptor) => source is CompositeFilterDescriptor;

示例使用

const filters: Array<FilterDescriptor | CompositeFilterDescriptor> = filter.filters;

filters.forEach((element: FilterDescriptor | CompositeFilterDescriptor) => {
    if (isCompositeFilterDescriptor(element)) {
        // element type is CompositeFilterDescriptor
    } else {
        // element type is FilterDescriptor
    }
});

Typescript中的类型保护:

TS有用于此目的的类型保护。他们是这样定义的:

执行运行时检查以保证类型的表达式 在某种范围内。

这基本上意味着TS编译器在拥有足够的信息时可以将类型缩小到更特定的类型。例如:

function foo (arg: number | string) {
    if (typeof arg === 'number') {
        // fine, type number has toFixed method
        arg.toFixed()
    } else {
        // Property 'toFixed' does not exist on type 'string'. Did you mean 'fixed'?
        arg.toFixed()
        // TSC can infer that the type is string because 
        // the possibility of type number is eliminated at the if statement
    }
}

回到您的问题，我们还可以将类型保护的概念应用于对象，以确定它们的类型。要为对象定义类型保护，需要定义一个返回类型为类型谓词的函数。例如:

interface Dog {
    bark: () => void;
}

// The function isDog is a user defined type guard
// the return type: 'pet is Dog' is a type predicate, 
// it determines whether the object is a Dog
function isDog(pet: object): pet is Dog {
  return (pet as Dog).bark !== undefined;
}

const dog: any = {bark: () => {console.log('woof')}};

if (isDog(dog)) {
    // TS now knows that objects within this if statement are always type Dog
    // This is because the type guard isDog narrowed down the type to Dog
    dog.bark();
}

我在filter-descriptor.interface.d.ts文件中的@progress/kendo-data-query中找到了一个例子

检查程序

declare const isCompositeFilterDescriptor: (source: FilterDescriptor | CompositeFilterDescriptor) => source is CompositeFilterDescriptor;

示例使用

const filters: Array<FilterDescriptor | CompositeFilterDescriptor> = filter.filters;

filters.forEach((element: FilterDescriptor | CompositeFilterDescriptor) => {
    if (isCompositeFilterDescriptor(element)) {
        // element type is CompositeFilterDescriptor
    } else {
        // element type is FilterDescriptor
    }
});

基于Fenton的回答，下面是我实现的一个函数，用于验证给定对象是否具有接口所具有的键(全部或部分)。

根据您的用例，您可能还需要检查每个接口属性的类型。下面的代码不会这样做。

function implementsTKeys<T>(obj: any, keys: (keyof T)[]): obj is T {
    if (!obj || !Array.isArray(keys)) {
        return false;
    }

    const implementKeys = keys.reduce((impl, key) => impl && key in obj, true);

    return implementKeys;
}

用法示例:

interface A {
    propOfA: string;
    methodOfA: Function;
}

let objectA: any = { propOfA: '' };

// Check if objectA partially implements A
let implementsA = implementsTKeys<A>(objectA, ['propOfA']);

console.log(implementsA); // true

objectA.methodOfA = () => true;

// Check if objectA fully implements A
implementsA = implementsTKeys<A>(objectA, ['propOfA', 'methodOfA']);

console.log(implementsA); // true

objectA = {};

// Check again if objectA fully implements A
implementsA = implementsTKeys<A>(objectA, ['propOfA', 'methodOfA']);

console.log(implementsA); // false, as objectA now is an empty object

我想指出的是，TypeScript并没有提供直接的机制来动态测试一个对象是否实现了特定的接口。

相反，TypeScript代码可以使用JavaScript技术来检查对象上是否存在适当的成员集。例如:

var obj : any = new Foo();

if (obj.someInterfaceMethod) {
    ...
}

你可以在没有instanceof关键字的情况下实现你想要的，因为你现在可以编写自定义类型保护:

interface A {
    member: string;
}

function instanceOfA(object: any): object is A {
    return 'member' in object;
}

var a: any = {member: "foobar"};

if (instanceOfA(a)) {
    alert(a.member);
}

会员众多

如果需要检查大量成员以确定对象是否与您的类型匹配，则可以添加标识符。下面是最基本的示例，并要求您管理自己的鉴别器…您需要深入了解模式，以确保避免重复标识符。

interface A {
    discriminator: 'I-AM-A';
    member: string;
}

function instanceOfA(object: any): object is A {
    return object.discriminator === 'I-AM-A';
}

var a: any = {discriminator: 'I-AM-A', member: "foobar"};

if (instanceOfA(a)) {
    alert(a.member);
}