我的单例访问方法通常是一些变种:
static MyClass *gInstance = NULL;
+ (MyClass *)instance
{
@synchronized(self)
{
if (gInstance == NULL)
gInstance = [[self alloc] init];
}
return(gInstance);
}
我能做些什么来改善这一点呢?
我的单例访问方法通常是一些变种:
static MyClass *gInstance = NULL;
+ (MyClass *)instance
{
@synchronized(self)
{
if (gInstance == NULL)
gInstance = [[self alloc] init];
}
return(gInstance);
}
我能做些什么来改善这一点呢?
当前回答
由于Kendall发布了一个线程安全的单例,试图避免锁定成本,我想我也会抛出一个:
#import <libkern/OSAtomic.h>
static void * volatile sharedInstance = nil;
+ (className *) sharedInstance {
while (!sharedInstance) {
className *temp = [[self alloc] init];
if(!OSAtomicCompareAndSwapPtrBarrier(0x0, temp, &sharedInstance)) {
[temp release];
}
}
return sharedInstance;
}
好吧,让我来解释一下这是怎么回事:
Fast case: In normal execution sharedInstance has already been set, so the while loop is never executed and the function returns after simply testing for the variable's existence; Slow case: If sharedInstance doesn't exist, then an instance is allocated and copied into it using a Compare And Swap ('CAS'); Contended case: If two threads both attempt to call sharedInstance at the same time AND sharedInstance doesn't exist at the same time then they will both initialize new instances of the singleton and attempt to CAS it into position. Whichever one wins the CAS returns immediately, whichever one loses releases the instance it just allocated and returns the (now set) sharedInstance. The single OSAtomicCompareAndSwapPtrBarrier acts as both a write barrier for the setting thread and a read barrier from the testing thread.
其他回答
static MyClass *sharedInst = nil; + (id)sharedInstance { @synchronize( self ) { if ( sharedInst == nil ) { /* sharedInst set up in init */ [[self alloc] init]; } } return sharedInst; } - (id)init { if ( sharedInst != nil ) { [NSException raise:NSInternalInconsistencyException format:@"[%@ %@] cannot be called; use +[%@ %@] instead"], NSStringFromClass([self class]), NSStringFromSelector(_cmd), NSStringFromClass([self class]), NSStringFromSelector(@selector(sharedInstance)"]; } else if ( self = [super init] ) { sharedInst = self; /* Whatever class specific here */ } return sharedInst; } /* These probably do nothing in a GC app. Keeps singleton as an actual singleton in a non CG app */ - (NSUInteger)retainCount { return NSUIntegerMax; } - (oneway void)release { } - (id)retain { return sharedInst; } - (id)autorelease { return sharedInst; }
编辑:这个实现在ARC中过时了。请看看我如何实现一个与ARC兼容的Objective-C单例?为了正确的执行。
我在其他答案中读到的所有初始化的实现都有一个共同的错误。
+ (void) initialize {
_instance = [[MySingletonClass alloc] init] // <----- Wrong!
}
+ (void) initialize {
if (self == [MySingletonClass class]){ // <----- Correct!
_instance = [[MySingletonClass alloc] init]
}
}
苹果文档建议你检查初始化块中的类类型。因为子类默认调用初始化。存在一种不明显的情况,即可以通过KVO间接创建子类。如果你在另一个类中添加以下行:
[[MySingletonClass getInstance] addObserver:self forKeyPath:@"foo" options:0 context:nil]
Objective-C将隐式地创建MySingletonClass的一个子类,导致第二次触发+initialize。
你可能认为你应该隐式地检查init块中重复的初始化,如下所示:
- (id) init { <----- Wrong!
if (_instance != nil) {
// Some hack
}
else {
// Do stuff
}
return self;
}
但你会搬起石头砸自己的脚;或者更糟糕的是,给其他开发者搬起石头砸自己的脚。
- (id) init { <----- Correct!
NSAssert(_instance == nil, @"Duplication initialization of singleton");
self = [super init];
if (self){
// Do stuff
}
return self;
}
TL, DR,这是我的实现
@implementation MySingletonClass
static MySingletonClass * _instance;
+ (void) initialize {
if (self == [MySingletonClass class]){
_instance = [[MySingletonClass alloc] init];
}
}
- (id) init {
ZAssert (_instance == nil, @"Duplication initialization of singleton");
self = [super init];
if (self) {
// Initialization
}
return self;
}
+ (id) getInstance {
return _instance;
}
@end
(用我们自己的断言宏替换ZAssert;或者只是NSAssert。)
关于Objective-C中单例模式的深入讨论,请看这里:
在Objective-C中使用单例模式
我已经将单例转换为一个类,这样其他类就可以继承单例属性。
Singleton.h:
static id sharedInstance = nil;
#define DEFINE_SHARED_INSTANCE + (id) sharedInstance { return [self sharedInstance:&sharedInstance]; } \
+ (id) allocWithZone:(NSZone *)zone { return [self allocWithZone:zone forInstance:&sharedInstance]; }
@interface Singleton : NSObject {
}
+ (id) sharedInstance;
+ (id) sharedInstance:(id*)inst;
+ (id) allocWithZone:(NSZone *)zone forInstance:(id*)inst;
@end
单例。m:
#import "Singleton.h"
@implementation Singleton
+ (id) sharedInstance {
return [self sharedInstance:&sharedInstance];
}
+ (id) sharedInstance:(id*)inst {
@synchronized(self)
{
if (*inst == nil)
*inst = [[self alloc] init];
}
return *inst;
}
+ (id) allocWithZone:(NSZone *)zone forInstance:(id*)inst {
@synchronized(self) {
if (*inst == nil) {
*inst = [super allocWithZone:zone];
return *inst; // assignment and return on first allocation
}
}
return nil; // on subsequent allocation attempts return nil
}
- (id)copyWithZone:(NSZone *)zone {
return self;
}
- (id)retain {
return self;
}
- (unsigned)retainCount {
return UINT_MAX; // denotes an object that cannot be released
}
- (void)release {
//do nothing
}
- (id)autorelease {
return self;
}
@end
这是一个类的例子,你想变成单例。
#import "Singleton.h"
@interface SomeClass : Singleton {
}
@end
@implementation SomeClass
DEFINE_SHARED_INSTANCE;
@end
单例类唯一的限制是它是NSObject的子类。但大多数时候我在我的代码中使用单例对象,它们实际上是NSObject的子类,所以这个类真的简化了我的生活,使代码更干净。
这也适用于非垃圾收集环境。
@interface MySingleton : NSObject {
}
+(MySingleton *)sharedManager;
@end
@implementation MySingleton
static MySingleton *sharedMySingleton = nil;
+(MySingleton*)sharedManager {
@synchronized(self) {
if (sharedMySingleton == nil) {
[[self alloc] init]; // assignment not done here
}
}
return sharedMySingleton;
}
+(id)allocWithZone:(NSZone *)zone {
@synchronized(self) {
if (sharedMySingleton == nil) {
sharedMySingleton = [super allocWithZone:zone];
return sharedMySingleton; // assignment and return on first allocation
}
}
return nil; //on subsequent allocation attempts return nil
}
-(void)dealloc {
[super dealloc];
}
-(id)copyWithZone:(NSZone *)zone {
return self;
}
-(id)retain {
return self;
}
-(unsigned)retainCount {
return UINT_MAX; //denotes an object that cannot be release
}
-(void)release {
//do nothing
}
-(id)autorelease {
return self;
}
-(id)init {
self = [super init];
sharedMySingleton = self;
//initialize here
return self;
}
@end