我的单例访问方法通常是一些变种:
static MyClass *gInstance = NULL;
+ (MyClass *)instance
{
@synchronized(self)
{
if (gInstance == NULL)
gInstance = [[self alloc] init];
}
return(gInstance);
}
我能做些什么来改善这一点呢?
我的单例访问方法通常是一些变种:
static MyClass *gInstance = NULL;
+ (MyClass *)instance
{
@synchronized(self)
{
if (gInstance == NULL)
gInstance = [[self alloc] init];
}
return(gInstance);
}
我能做些什么来改善这一点呢?
当前回答
我通常使用的代码大致类似于Ben Hoffstein的回答(这也是我从维基百科上得到的)。我使用它的原因是Chris Hanson在他的评论中提到的。
然而,有时我需要将一个单例放入NIB中,在这种情况下,我使用以下方法:
@implementation Singleton
static Singleton *singleton = nil;
- (id)init {
static BOOL initialized = NO;
if (!initialized) {
self = [super init];
singleton = self;
initialized = YES;
}
return self;
}
+ (id)allocWithZone:(NSZone*)zone {
@synchronized (self) {
if (!singleton)
singleton = [super allocWithZone:zone];
}
return singleton;
}
+ (Singleton*)sharedSingleton {
if (!singleton)
[[Singleton alloc] init];
return singleton;
}
@end
我把-retain(等等)的实现留给读者,尽管在垃圾收集环境中您只需要上面的代码。
其他回答
简单回答:太棒了。
长话短说:类似....
static SomeSingleton *instance = NULL;
@implementation SomeSingleton
+ (id) instance {
static dispatch_once_t onceToken;
dispatch_once(&onceToken, ^{
if (instance == NULL){
instance = [[super allocWithZone:NULL] init];
}
});
return instance;
}
+ (id) allocWithZone:(NSZone *)paramZone {
return [[self instance] retain];
}
- (id) copyWithZone:(NSZone *)paramZone {
return self;
}
- (id) autorelease {
return self;
}
- (NSUInteger) retainCount {
return NSUIntegerMax;
}
- (id) retain {
return self;
}
@end
一定要阅读dispatch/once.h头文件以了解发生了什么。在这种情况下,标题注释比文档或手册页更适用。
由于Kendall发布了一个线程安全的单例,试图避免锁定成本,我想我也会抛出一个:
#import <libkern/OSAtomic.h>
static void * volatile sharedInstance = nil;
+ (className *) sharedInstance {
while (!sharedInstance) {
className *temp = [[self alloc] init];
if(!OSAtomicCompareAndSwapPtrBarrier(0x0, temp, &sharedInstance)) {
[temp release];
}
}
return sharedInstance;
}
好吧,让我来解释一下这是怎么回事:
Fast case: In normal execution sharedInstance has already been set, so the while loop is never executed and the function returns after simply testing for the variable's existence; Slow case: If sharedInstance doesn't exist, then an instance is allocated and copied into it using a Compare And Swap ('CAS'); Contended case: If two threads both attempt to call sharedInstance at the same time AND sharedInstance doesn't exist at the same time then they will both initialize new instances of the singleton and attempt to CAS it into position. Whichever one wins the CAS returns immediately, whichever one loses releases the instance it just allocated and returns the (now set) sharedInstance. The single OSAtomicCompareAndSwapPtrBarrier acts as both a write barrier for the setting thread and a read barrier from the testing thread.
对于Objective C类方法,我们可以避免以通常的方式使用单例模式,如下所示:
[[Librarian sharedInstance] openLibrary]
to:
[Librarian openLibrary]
通过将类包装到另一个只有类方法的类中,这样就不会意外地创建重复的实例,因为我们没有创建任何实例!
我在这里写了一篇更详细的博客:)
我的方法很简单:
static id instanceOfXXX = nil;
+ (id) sharedXXX
{
static volatile BOOL initialized = NO;
if (!initialized)
{
@synchronized([XXX class])
{
if (!initialized)
{
instanceOfXXX = [[XXX alloc] init];
initialized = YES;
}
}
}
return instanceOfXXX;
}
如果单例已经初始化,LOCK块将不会被输入。第二次检查if(!initialized)是为了确保当前线程获得LOCK时它还没有初始化。
你不想在self上同步…因为self对象还不存在!最终锁定一个临时id值。你想要确保没有其他人可以运行类方法(sharedInstance, alloc, allocWithZone:等),所以你需要在类对象上同步:
@implementation MYSingleton
static MYSingleton * sharedInstance = nil;
+( id )sharedInstance {
@synchronized( [ MYSingleton class ] ) {
if( sharedInstance == nil )
sharedInstance = [ [ MYSingleton alloc ] init ];
}
return sharedInstance;
}
+( id )allocWithZone:( NSZone * )zone {
@synchronized( [ MYSingleton class ] ) {
if( sharedInstance == nil )
sharedInstance = [ super allocWithZone:zone ];
}
return sharedInstance;
}
-( id )init {
@synchronized( [ MYSingleton class ] ) {
self = [ super init ];
if( self != nil ) {
// Insert initialization code here
}
return self;
}
}
@end