由于JVM调用finalize()方法存在不确定性(不确定被重写的finalize()是否会被执行)，为了研究目的，观察finalize()调用时发生的情况的更好方法是通过命令System.gc()强制JVM调用垃圾收集。

具体来说，finalize()在对象不再使用时被调用。但是当我们试图通过创建新对象来调用它时，它的调用是不确定的。因此，为了确定起见，我们创建了一个空对象c，它显然没有未来的用途，因此我们看到对象c的finalize调用。

例子

class Car {

    int maxspeed;

    Car() {
        maxspeed = 70;
    }

    protected void finalize() {

    // Originally finalize method does nothing, but here we override finalize() saying it to print some stmt
    // Calling of finalize is uncertain. Difficult to observe so we force JVM to call it by System.gc(); GarbageCollection

        System.out.println("Called finalize method in class Car...");
    }
}

class Bike {

    int maxspeed;

    Bike() {
        maxspeed = 50;
    }

    protected void finalize() {
        System.out.println("Called finalize method in class Bike...");
    }
}

class Example {

    public static void main(String args[]) {
        Car c = new Car();
        c = null;    // if c weren`t null JVM wouldn't be certain it's cleared or not, null means has no future use or no longer in use hence clears it
        Bike b = new Bike();
        System.gc();    // should clear c, but not b
        for (b.maxspeed = 1; b.maxspeed <= 70; b.maxspeed++) {
            System.out.print("\t" + b.maxspeed);
            if (b.maxspeed > 50) {
                System.out.println("Over Speed. Pls slow down.");
            }
        }
    }
}

输出

    Called finalize method in class Car...
            1       2       3       4       5       6       7       8       9
    10      11      12      13      14      15      16      17      18      19
    20      21      22      23      24      25      26      27      28      29
    30      31      32      33      34      35      36      37      38      39
    40      41      42      43      44      45      46      47      48      49
    50      51Over Speed. Pls slow down.
            52Over Speed. Pls slow down.
            53Over Speed. Pls slow down.
            54Over Speed. Pls slow down.
            55Over Speed. Pls slow down.
            56Over Speed. Pls slow down.
            57Over Speed. Pls slow down.
            58Over Speed. Pls slow down. 
            59Over Speed. Pls slow down.
            60Over Speed. Pls slow down.
            61Over Speed. Pls slow down.
            62Over Speed. Pls slow down.
            63Over Speed. Pls slow down.
            64Over Speed. Pls slow down.
            65Over Speed. Pls slow down.
            66Over Speed. Pls slow down.
            67Over Speed. Pls slow down.
            68Over Speed. Pls slow down.
            69Over Speed. Pls slow down.
            70Over Speed. Pls slow down.

注意:即使打印到70，并且在此之后对象b在程序中没有被使用，也不确定b是否被JVM清除，因为“调用的finalize方法在类Bike…”没有打印。

protected void finalize() throws Throwable {} every class inherits the finalize() method from java.lang.Object the method is called by the garbage collector when it determines no more references to the object exist the Object finalize method performs no actions but it may be overridden by any class normally it should be overridden to clean-up non-Java resources ie closing a file if overridding finalize() it is good programming practice to use a try-catch-finally statement and to always call super.finalize(). This is a safety measure to ensure you do not inadvertently miss closing a resource used by the objects calling class protected void finalize() throws Throwable { try { close(); // close open files } finally { super.finalize(); } } any exception thrown by finalize() during garbage collection halts the finalization but is otherwise ignored finalize() is never run more than once on any object

引用自:http://www.janeg.ca/scjp/gc/finalize.html

你也可以看看这篇文章:

对象终结和清理

finalize方法在对象即将被垃圾收集时被调用。这可以在它有资格进行垃圾收集之后的任何时间进行。

注意，完全有可能一个对象永远不会被垃圾收集(因此finalize永远不会被调用)。当对象永远不符合gc条件(因为在JVM的整个生命周期内都可以访问它)，或者在对象符合条件到JVM停止运行之间没有实际运行垃圾收集时(这种情况经常发生在简单的测试程序中)，就会发生这种情况。

有一些方法可以告诉JVM在尚未调用的对象上运行finalize，但使用这些方法也不是一个好主意(该方法的保证也不是很强)。

如果您依赖finalize来实现应用程序的正确操作，那么您就做错了一些事情。finalize只能用于清理(通常是非java)资源。这正是因为JVM不能保证finalize在任何对象上都被调用。

类，在其中重写finalize方法

public class TestClass {    
    public TestClass() {
        System.out.println("constructor");
    }

    public void display() {
        System.out.println("display");
    }
    @Override
    public void finalize() {
        System.out.println("destructor");
    }
}

finalize方法被调用的几率

public class TestGarbageCollection {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        while (true) {
            TestClass s = new TestClass();
            s.display();
            System.gc();
        }
    }
}

当内存被转储对象重载时，gc将调用finalize方法

运行并查看控制台，在那里你不会发现finalize方法被频繁调用，当内存超载时，finalize方法将被调用。

在最近与终结器方法搏斗之后(为了在测试期间处理连接池)，我不得不说终结器缺少很多东西。使用VisualVM来观察以及使用弱引用来跟踪实际的交互，我发现以下事情在Java 8环境中是正确的(Oracle JDK, Ubuntu 15):

Finalize is not called immediately the Finalizer (GC part) individually owns the reference elusively The default Garbage Collector pools unreachable objects Finalize is called in bulk pointing to an implementation detail that there is a certain phase the garbage collector frees the resources. Calling System.gc() often does not result in objects being finalized more often, it just results in the Finalizer getting aware of an unreachable object more rapidly Creating a thread dump almost always result in triggering the finalizer due to high heap overhead during performing the heap dump or some other internal mechanism Finalization seams to be bound by either memory requirements (free up more memory) or by the list of objects being marked for finalization growing of a certain internal limit. So if you have a lot of objects getting finalized the finalization phase will be triggered more often and earlier when compared with only a few There were circumstances a System.gc() triggered a finalize directly but only if the reference was a local and short living. This might be generation related.

最后认为

最后确定方法是不可靠的，但只能用于一件事。您可以确保在垃圾收集之前关闭或释放对象，从而在正确处理涉及生命结束操作的更复杂生命周期的对象时实现故障安全。这是我能想到的一个值得我们去推翻它的原因。

JDK 18的最新消息

根据openjdk 18发布的JEPS 421, finalize()方法的终结和功能将被标记为已弃用(forRemoval=true)，这意味着永久删除将在jdk 18之后的某个后续版本中进行。

从jdk 18开始，一个新的命令行选项——finalization=disabled禁用了所有地方的终结机制，甚至是jdk内部的声明。

这也与这里的这个问题有关，因为它被计划删除的原因是它包含的一些主要缺陷。其中一个缺陷是，从一个对象变得不可访问到调用它的终结器之间可能会经过很长一段时间。GC也不能保证任何终结器将被调用，这也是事实。