基本上，Serializable是一个标记接口，它暗示一个类对于序列化是安全的，并且JVM决定它如何序列化。Externalizable包含两个方法，readExternal和writeExternal。Externalizable允许实现者决定如何序列化一个对象，而Serializable序列化对象是默认的方式。

要添加到其他答案，请实现java.io。Serializable，您可以获得类对象的“自动”序列化功能。不需要实现任何其他逻辑，它就可以工作了。Java运行时将使用反射来确定如何封送和解封送对象。

In earlier version of Java, reflection was very slow, and so serializaing large object graphs (e.g. in client-server RMI applications) was a bit of a performance problem. To handle this situation, the java.io.Externalizable interface was provided, which is like java.io.Serializable but with custom-written mechanisms to perform the marshalling and unmarshalling functions (you need to implement readExternal and writeExternal methods on your class). This gives you the means to get around the reflection performance bottleneck.

在Java的最新版本(当然是1.3以后)中，反射的性能比以前好得多，所以这不是一个大问题。我怀疑在现代JVM中，您很难从Externalizable中获得有意义的好处。

此外，内置的Java序列化机制并不是唯一的，您可以获得第三方替代机制，例如JBoss serialization，它要快得多，并且是默认的替代机制。

Externalizable一个很大的缺点是你必须自己维护这个逻辑——如果你在你的类中添加、删除或改变一个字段，你必须改变你的writeExternal/ readeexternal方法来解释它。

总之，Externalizable是Java 1.1时代的遗留物。真的没有必要了。

在考虑提高性能的选项时，不要忘记自定义序列化。您可以免费让Java做它擅长的事情，或者至少做得足够好，并为它做得不好的事情提供自定义支持。这通常比完全的外部化支持少得多。

实际上并没有提供Externalizable接口来优化序列化进程的性能!而是提供实现您自己的自定义处理的方法，并为对象及其超类型提供对流的格式和内容的完全控制!

这方面的例子是AMF (ActionScript Message Format)远程处理的实现，通过网络传输本机操作脚本对象。

Serializable和Externalizable之间的主要区别

Marker interface: Serializable is marker interface without any methods. Externalizable interface contains two methods: writeExternal() and readExternal(). Serialization process: Default Serialization process will be kicked-in for classes implementing Serializable interface. Programmer defined Serialization process will be kicked-in for classes implementing Externalizable interface. Maintenance: Incompatible changes may break serialisation. Backward Compatibility and Control: If you have to support multiple versions, you can have full control with Externalizable interface. You can support different versions of your object. If you implement Externalizable, it's your responsibility to serialize super class public No-arg constructor: Serializable uses reflection to construct object and does not require no arg constructor. But Externalizable demands public no-arg constructor.

更多细节请参考Hitesh Garg的博客。

一些差异:

For Serialization there is no need of default constructor of that class because Object because JVM construct the same with help of Reflection API. In case of Externalization contructor with no arg is required, because the control is in hand of programmar and later on assign the deserialized data to object via setters. In serialization if user want to skip certain properties to be serialized then has to mark that properties as transient, vice versa is not required for Externalization. When backward compatiblity support is expected for any class then it is recommended to go with Externalizable. Serialization supports defaultObject persisting and if object structure is broken then it will cause issue while deserializing.