我有一个循环,开头为for I,范围为(0,100)。正常情况下,它可以正常运行,但有时由于网络条件而出现故障。目前,我已经设置它,以便在失败时,它将继续在except子句中(继续到I的下一个数字)。

我是否可以将相同的数字重新分配给i,并再次运行失败的循环迭代?


当前回答

带超时的通用解决方案:

import time

def onerror_retry(exception, callback, timeout=2, timedelta=.1):
    end_time = time.time() + timeout
    while True:
        try:
            yield callback()
            break
        except exception:
            if time.time() > end_time:
                raise
            elif timedelta > 0:
                time.sleep(timedelta)

用法:

for retry in onerror_retry(SomeSpecificException, do_stuff):
    retry()

其他回答

我在我的代码中使用following,

   for i in range(0, 10):
    try:
        #things I need to do
    except ValueError:
        print("Try #{} failed with ValueError: Sleeping for 2 secs before next try:".format(i))
        time.sleep(2)
        continue
    break

你可以有一个专门的函数使用返回短路结果。比如这样:

def my_function_with_retries(..., max_retries=100):
    for attempt in range(max_retries):
        try:
            return my_function(...)
        except SomeSpecificException as error:
            logging.warning(f"Retrying after failed execution: {error}")

    raise SomeOtherException()

不使用那些丑陋的while循环的更“功能性”的方法:

def tryAgain(retries=0):
    if retries > 10: return
    try:
        # Do stuff
    except:
        retries+=1
        tryAgain(retries)

tryAgain()

尝试次数= 3 而尝试: 试一试: ... ... <状态好了> 打破 除了: 尝试- = 1 Else: #已执行的唯一break未被引发 < >失败状态

for _ in range(5):
    try:
        # replace this with something that may fail
        raise ValueError("foo")

    # replace Exception with a more specific exception
    except Exception as e:
        err = e
        continue

    # no exception, continue remainder of code
    else:
        break

# did not break the for loop, therefore all attempts
# raised an exception
else:
    raise err

我的版本与上面的几个类似,但没有使用单独的while循环,如果所有重试都失败,则重新引发最新的异常。可以显式地在顶部设置err = None,但不是严格必要的,因为它只应该在出现错误时执行最后一个else块,因此设置了err。