我刚刚搞砸了一次面试,而且我的面试问题几乎毫无进展。
给定一个数,找出下一个与之完全相同的更大的数 作为原始数字的数字集。例如:给定38276返回 38627
我想从找到第一个比个位小的数字的下标开始。然后我将旋转子集中的最后一个数字,这样它是由相同的数字组成的下一个最大的数字,但卡住了。
面试官还建议我试着一次换一个数字,但我搞不懂算法,只能盯着屏幕看20-30分钟。不用说,我想我还得继续找工作。
我刚刚搞砸了一次面试,而且我的面试问题几乎毫无进展。
给定一个数,找出下一个与之完全相同的更大的数 作为原始数字的数字集。例如:给定38276返回 38627
我想从找到第一个比个位小的数字的下标开始。然后我将旋转子集中的最后一个数字,这样它是由相同的数字组成的下一个最大的数字,但卡住了。
面试官还建议我试着一次换一个数字,但我搞不懂算法,只能盯着屏幕看20-30分钟。不用说,我想我还得继续找工作。
当前回答
非常简单的实现使用Javascript,下一个最高的数字与相同的数字
/*
Algorithm applied
I) Traverse the given number from rightmost digit, keep traversing till you find a digit which is smaller than the previously traversed digit. For example, if the input number is “534976”, we stop at 4 because 4 is smaller than next digit 9. If we do not find such a digit, then output is “Not Possible”.
II) Now search the right side of above found digit ‘d’ for the smallest digit greater than ‘d’. For “534976″, the right side of 4 contains “976”. The smallest digit greater than 4 is 6.
III) Swap the above found two digits, we get 536974 in above example.
IV) Now sort all digits from position next to ‘d’ to the end of number. The number that we get after sorting is the output. For above example, we sort digits in bold 536974. We get “536479” which is the next greater number for input 534976.
*/
function findNext(arr)
{
let i;
//breaking down a digit into arrays of string and then converting back that array to number array
let arr1=arr.toString().split('').map(Number) ;
//started to loop from the end of array
for(i=arr1.length;i>0;i--)
{
//looking for if the current number is greater than the number next to it
if(arr1[i]>arr1[i-1])
{// if yes then we break the loop it so that we can swap and sort
break;}
}
if(i==0)
{console.log("Not possible");}
else
{
//saving that big number and smaller number to the left of it
let smlNum =arr1[i-1];
let bigNum =i;
/*now looping again and checking if we have any other greater number, if we have one AFTER big number and smaller number to the right.
A greater number that is of course greater than that smaller number but smaller than the first number we found.
Why are doing this? Because that is an algorithm to find next higher number with same digits.
*/
for(let j=i+1;j<arr1.length;j++)
{//What if there are no digits afters those found numbers then of course loop will not be initiated otherwise...
if(arr1[j]> smlNum && arr1[j]<arr1[i])
{// we assign that other found number here and replace it with the one we found before
bigNum=j;
}
} //now we are doing swapping of places the small num and big number , 3rd part of alogorithm
arr1[i-1]=arr1[bigNum];
arr1[bigNum]=smlNum;
//returning array
//too many functions applied sounds complicated right but no, here is the trick
//return arr first then apply each function one by one to see output and then further another func to that output to match your needs
// so here after swapping , 4th part of alogorithm is to sort the array right after the 1st small num we found
// to do that first we simple take part of array, we splice it and then we apply sort fucntion, then check output (to check outputs, pls use chrome dev console)
//and then simply the rest concat and join to main one digit again.
return arr1.concat((arr1.splice(i,arr1.length)).sort(function(a, b){return a-b})).join('');
// Sorry to make it too long but its fun explaining things in much easier ways as much as possible!!
}
}
findNext(1234);
因为有很多评论,所以你最好把它复制到你的文本编辑器。 谢谢!
其他回答
取一个数,把它分成几位数。如果我们有一个5位数,我们就有5位数:abcde
现在交换d和e,并与原来的数字进行比较,如果它更大,你就得到了答案。
如果它不是很大,交换e和c。现在比较,如果它更小,再次交换d和e(注意递归),取最小的。
一直算下去,直到找到一个更大的数字。通过递归,它应该相当于9行方案,或20行c#。
解决方案(在Java中)可能是以下(我相信这里的朋友可以找到更好的): 从字符串的末尾开始交换数字,直到得到一个更高的数字。 也就是说,首先从下位开始移动。然后到达下一个更高的地方,直到你到达下一个更高的地方。 然后对剩下的进行排序。 在你的例子中,你会得到:
38276 --> 38267 (smaller) --> 38627 Found it
^ ^ ^
public static int nextDigit(int number){
String num = String.valueOf(number);
int stop = 0;
char [] chars = null;
outer:
for(int i = num.length() - 1; i > 0; i--){
chars = num.toCharArray();
for(int j = i; j > 0; j--){
char temp = chars[j];
chars[j] = chars[j - 1];
chars[j - 1] = temp;
if(Integer.valueOf(new String(chars)) > number){
stop = j;
break outer;
}
}
}
Arrays.sort(chars, stop, chars.length);
return Integer.valueOf(new String(chars));
}
这是个很有趣的问题。
这是我的java版本。在我检查其他贡献者的评论之前,从弄清楚模式到完全完成代码,我花了大约3个小时。很高兴看到我的想法和别人一样。
O (n)的解决方案。老实说,如果时间只有15分钟,并且要求在白板上完成完整的代码,我将会失败。
以下是我的解决方案的一些有趣点:
避免任何排序。 完全避免字符串操作 实现O(logN)空间复杂度
我在代码中添加了详细注释,并在每个步骤中添加了大O。
public int findNextBiggestNumber(int input ) {
//take 1358642 as input for example.
//Step 1: split the whole number to a list for individual digital 1358642->[2,4,6,8,5,3,1]
// this step is O(n)
int digitalLevel=input;
List<Integer> orgNumbersList=new ArrayList<Integer>() ;
do {
Integer nInt = new Integer(digitalLevel % 10);
orgNumbersList.add(nInt);
digitalLevel=(int) (digitalLevel/10 ) ;
} while( digitalLevel >0) ;
int len= orgNumbersList.size();
int [] orgNumbers=new int[len] ;
for(int i=0;i<len;i++){
orgNumbers[i ] = orgNumbersList.get(i).intValue();
}
//step 2 find the first digital less than the digital right to it
// this step is O(n)
int firstLessPointer=1;
while(firstLessPointer<len&&(orgNumbers[firstLessPointer]>orgNumbers[ firstLessPointer-1 ])){
firstLessPointer++;
}
if(firstLessPointer==len-1&&orgNumbers[len-1]>=orgNumbers[len-2]){
//all number is in sorted order like 4321, no answer for it, return original
return input;
}
//when step 2 step finished, firstLessPointer pointing to number 5
//step 3 fristLessPointer found, need to find to first number less than it from low digital in the number
//This step is O(n)
int justBiggerPointer= 0 ;
while(justBiggerPointer<firstLessPointer&& orgNumbers[justBiggerPointer]<orgNumbers[firstLessPointer]){
justBiggerPointer++;
}
//when step 3 finished, justBiggerPointer pointing to 6
//step 4 swap the elements of justBiggerPointer and firstLessPointer .
// This is O(1) operation for swap
int tmp= orgNumbers[firstLessPointer] ;
orgNumbers[firstLessPointer]= orgNumbers[justBiggerPointer] ;
orgNumbers[justBiggerPointer]=tmp ;
// when step 4 finished, the list looks like [2,4,5,8,6,3,1] the digital in the list before
// firstLessPointer is already sorted in our previous operation
// we can return result from this list but in a differrent way
int result=0;
int i=0;
int lowPointer=firstLessPointer;
//the following pick number from list from the position just before firstLessPointer, here is 8 -> 5 -> 4 -> 2
//This Operation is O(n)
while(lowPointer>0) {
result+= orgNumbers[--lowPointer]* Math.pow(10,i);
i++;
}
//the following pick number from list from position firstLessPointer
//This Operation is O(n)
while(firstLessPointer<len) {
result+= orgNumbers[firstLessPointer++ ]* Math.pow(10,i);
i++;
}
return result;
}
下面是在Intellj中运行的结果:
959879532-->959892357
1358642-->1362458
1234567-->1234576
77654321-->77654321
38276-->38627
47-->74
如果你用c++编程,你可以使用next_permutation:
#include <algorithm>
#include <string>
#include <iostream>
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
using namespace std;
string x;
while (cin >> x) {
cout << x << " -> ";
next_permutation(x.begin(),x.end());
cout << x << "\n";
}
return 0;
}
下面是Python中的一个紧凑(但部分是蛮力)解决方案
def findnext(ii): return min(v for v in (int("".join(x)) for x in
itertools.permutations(str(ii))) if v>ii)
在c++中,你可以这样排列:https://stackoverflow.com/a/9243091/1149664(它与itertools中的算法相同)
以下是Weeble和BlueRaja描述的顶部答案的实现(其他答案)。我怀疑还有什么更好的办法。
def findnext(ii):
iis=list(map(int,str(ii)))
for i in reversed(range(len(iis))):
if i == 0: return ii
if iis[i] > iis[i-1] :
break
left,right=iis[:i],iis[i:]
for k in reversed(range(len(right))):
if right[k]>left[-1]:
right[k],left[-1]=left[-1],right[k]
break
return int("".join(map(str,(left+sorted(right)))))