new Timer(""){{
    // code to time 
}}.timeMe();



public class Timer {

    private final String timerName;
    private long started;

    public Timer(String timerName) {
        this.timerName = timerName;
        this.started = System.currentTimeMillis();
    }

    public void timeMe() {
        System.out.println(
        String.format("Execution of '%s' takes %dms.", 
                timerName, 
                started-System.currentTimeMillis()));
    }

}

下面是打印好的字符串，格式化后的秒数，类似于谷歌搜索所需的时间:

        long startTime = System.nanoTime();
        //  ... methodToTime();
        long endTime = System.nanoTime();
        long duration = (endTime - startTime);
        long seconds = (duration / 1000) % 60;
        // formatedSeconds = (0.xy seconds)
        String formatedSeconds = String.format("(0.%d seconds)", seconds);
        System.out.println("formatedSeconds = "+ formatedSeconds);
        // i.e actual formatedSeconds = (0.52 seconds)

在Java 8中引入了一个名为Instant的新类。根据文件:

Instant represents the start of a nanosecond on the time line. This class is useful for generating a time stamp to represent machine time. The range of an instant requires the storage of a number larger than a long. To achieve this, the class stores a long representing epoch-seconds and an int representing nanosecond-of-second, which will always be between 0 and 999,999,999. The epoch-seconds are measured from the standard Java epoch of 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z where instants after the epoch have positive values, and earlier instants have negative values. For both the epoch-second and nanosecond parts, a larger value is always later on the time-line than a smaller value.

这可以用于:

Instant start = Instant.now();
try {
    Thread.sleep(7000);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
    e.printStackTrace();
}
Instant end = Instant.now();
System.out.println(Duration.between(start, end));

打印pt7.001。

使用分析器(JProfiler, Netbeans profiler, Visual VM, Eclipse profiler等)。您将得到最准确的结果，并且是最少的干扰。它们使用内置的JVM机制进行概要分析，还可以为您提供额外的信息，如堆栈跟踪、执行路径以及必要时更全面的结果。

当使用完全集成的分析器时，对方法进行分析是非常简单的。右击，分析器->添加到根方法。然后像运行测试运行或调试器一样运行剖析器。

在Spring框架中我们有一个叫做StopWatch的调用(org。Spring framework。util。StopWatch)

//measuring elapsed time using Spring StopWatch
        StopWatch watch = new StopWatch();
        watch.start();
        for(int i=0; i< 1000; i++){
            Object obj = new Object();
        }
        watch.stop();
        System.out.println("Total execution time to create 1000 objects in Java using StopWatch in millis: "
                + watch.getTotalTimeMillis());

如果您不使用工具，并且希望对执行时间较短的方法进行计时，那么只需执行多次，每次将执行次数增加一倍，直到达到1秒左右。因此，系统调用的时间。纳米时间等，也没有系统的准确性。nanoTime确实对结果有很大影响。

    int runs = 0, runsPerRound = 10;
    long begin = System.nanoTime(), end;
    do {
        for (int i=0; i<runsPerRound; ++i) timedMethod();
        end = System.nanoTime();
        runs += runsPerRound;
        runsPerRound *= 2;
    } while (runs < Integer.MAX_VALUE / 2 && 1000000000L > end - begin);
    System.out.println("Time for timedMethod() is " + 
        0.000000001 * (end-begin) / runs + " seconds");

当然，使用挂钟也有一些注意事项:jit编译、多线程/进程等的影响。因此，您需要首先执行该方法很多次，以便JIT编译器完成它的工作，然后重复此测试多次，并使用最短的执行时间。