另外，这个算法对我来说也很好…

sensitivity = 4; dwindow = 4; k = dwindow; data = [1., 1., 1., 1., 1., 1., 1., 1.1, 1., 0.8, 0.9, 1., 1.2, 0.9, 1., 1., 1.1, 1.2, 1., 1.5, 1., 3., 2., 5., 3., 2., 1., 1., 1., 0.9, 1., 1., 3., 2.6, 4., 3., 3.2, 2., 1., 1., 1., 1., 1. ]; //data = data.concat(data); //data = data.concat(data); var data1 = [{ name: 'original source', y: data }]; Plotly.newPlot('stage1', data1, { title: 'Sensor data', yaxis: { title: 'signal' } }); filtered = data.map((a,b,c)=>a>=Math.max(...c.slice(b-k,b))?a**3:0); var data2 = [{ name: 'filtered source', y: filtered }]; Plotly.newPlot('stage2', data2, { title: 'Filtered data<br>aₙ = aₙ³', yaxis: { title: 'signal' } }); dwindow = 6; k = dwindow; detected = filtered.map((a,b,c)=>a>Math.max(...c.slice(2))/sensitivity).map((a,b,c)=>(b>k) && c.slice(b-k,b).indexOf(a)==-1 ); var data3 = [{ name: 'detected peaks', y: detected }]; Plotly.newPlot('stage3', data3, { title: 'Maximum in a window of 6', yaxis: { title: 'signal' } }); dwindow = 10; k = dwindow; detected = filtered.map((a, b, c) => a > Math.max(...c.slice(2)) / 20).map((a, b, c) => (b > k) && c.slice(b - k, b).indexOf(a) == -1) var data4 = [{ name: 'detected peaks', y: detected }]; Plotly.newPlot('stage4', data4, { title: 'Maximum in a window of 10', yaxis: { title: 'signal' } }); <script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/plotly.js@2.16.5/dist/plotly.min.js"></script> <div id="stage1"></div> <div id="stage2"></div> <div id="stage3"></div> <div id="stage4"></div>

在信号处理中，峰值检测通常采用小波变换。基本上就是对时间序列数据进行离散小波变换。返回的细节系数中的过零将对应于时间序列信号中的峰值。你会在不同的细节系数水平上检测到不同的峰值振幅，这给了你多层次的分辨率。

一种方法是根据以下观察来检测峰:

时间t是一个峰值(y (t) > y (t - 1)) & & ((t) > y (t + 1))

它通过等待上升趋势结束来避免误报。它并不完全是“实时”的，因为它会比峰值差一个dt。灵敏度可以通过要求比较的裕度来控制。在噪声检测和时延检测之间存在一种折衷。 您可以通过添加更多参数来丰富模型:

峰如果y (y (t) - (t-dt) > m) && (y (t) - y (t + dt) > m)

dt和m是控制灵敏度和延时的参数

这是你用上述算法得到的结果:

下面是在python中重现图的代码:

import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
input = np.array([ 1. ,  1. ,  1. ,  1. ,  1. ,  1. ,  1. ,  1.1,  1. ,  0.8,  0.9,
    1. ,  1.2,  0.9,  1. ,  1. ,  1.1,  1.2,  1. ,  1.5,  1. ,  3. ,
    2. ,  5. ,  3. ,  2. ,  1. ,  1. ,  1. ,  0.9,  1. ,  1. ,  3. ,
    2.6,  4. ,  3. ,  3.2,  2. ,  1. ,  1. ,  1. ,  1. ,  1. ])
signal = (input > np.roll(input,1)) & (input > np.roll(input,-1))
plt.plot(input)
plt.plot(signal.nonzero()[0], input[signal], 'ro')
plt.show()

通过设置m = 0.5，你可以得到一个更清晰的信号，只有一个假阳性:

我们尝试在我们的数据集上使用平滑的z-score算法，这导致了过度敏感或不敏感(取决于参数如何调整)，几乎没有中间地带。在我们站点的交通信号中，我们观察到一个低频基线，它代表了每天的周期，即使有最好的可能参数(如下所示)，它仍然在第4天下降，特别是因为大多数数据点被认为是异常的。

在原始z-score算法的基础上，我们提出了一种通过反向滤波来解决这个问题的方法。改进后的算法及其在电视商业流量归因中的应用详见我们的团队博客。

这是一个Python实现的鲁棒峰值检测算法算法。

初始化和计算部分被分开，只有filtered_y数组被保留，它的最大大小等于延迟，因此内存没有增加。(结果与上述答案相同)。 为了绘制图形，还保留了标签数组。

我做了一个github要点。

import numpy as np
import pylab

def init(x, lag, threshold, influence):
    '''
    Smoothed z-score algorithm
    Implementation of algorithm from https://stackoverflow.com/a/22640362/6029703
    '''

    labels = np.zeros(lag)
    filtered_y = np.array(x[0:lag])
    avg_filter = np.zeros(lag)
    std_filter = np.zeros(lag)
    var_filter = np.zeros(lag)

    avg_filter[lag - 1] = np.mean(x[0:lag])
    std_filter[lag - 1] = np.std(x[0:lag])
    var_filter[lag - 1] = np.var(x[0:lag])

    return dict(avg=avg_filter[lag - 1], var=var_filter[lag - 1],
                std=std_filter[lag - 1], filtered_y=filtered_y,
                labels=labels)


def add(result, single_value, lag, threshold, influence):
    previous_avg = result['avg']
    previous_var = result['var']
    previous_std = result['std']
    filtered_y = result['filtered_y']
    labels = result['labels']

    if abs(single_value - previous_avg) > threshold * previous_std:
        if single_value > previous_avg:
            labels = np.append(labels, 1)
        else:
            labels = np.append(labels, -1)

        # calculate the new filtered element using the influence factor
        filtered_y = np.append(filtered_y, influence * single_value
                               + (1 - influence) * filtered_y[-1])
    else:
        labels = np.append(labels, 0)
        filtered_y = np.append(filtered_y, single_value)

    # update avg as sum of the previuos avg + the lag * (the new calculated item - calculated item at position (i - lag))
    current_avg_filter = previous_avg + 1. / lag * (filtered_y[-1]
            - filtered_y[len(filtered_y) - lag - 1])

    # update variance as the previuos element variance + 1 / lag * new recalculated item - the previous avg -
    current_var_filter = previous_var + 1. / lag * ((filtered_y[-1]
            - previous_avg) ** 2 - (filtered_y[len(filtered_y) - 1
            - lag] - previous_avg) ** 2 - (filtered_y[-1]
            - filtered_y[len(filtered_y) - 1 - lag]) ** 2 / lag)  # the recalculated element at pos (lag) - avg of the previuos - new recalculated element - recalculated element at lag pos ....

    # calculate standard deviation for current element as sqrt (current variance)
    current_std_filter = np.sqrt(current_var_filter)

    return dict(avg=current_avg_filter, var=current_var_filter,
                std=current_std_filter, filtered_y=filtered_y[1:],
                labels=labels)

lag = 30
threshold = 5
influence = 0

y = np.array([1,1,1.1,1,0.9,1,1,1.1,1,0.9,1,1.1,1,1,0.9,1,1,1.1,1,1,1,1,1.1,0.9,1,1.1,1,1,0.9,
       1,1.1,1,1,1.1,1,0.8,0.9,1,1.2,0.9,1,1,1.1,1.2,1,1.5,1,3,2,5,3,2,1,1,1,0.9,1,1,3,
       2.6,4,3,3.2,2,1,1,0.8,4,4,2,2.5,1,1,1])

# Run algo with settings from above
result = init(y[:lag], lag=lag, threshold=threshold, influence=influence)

i = open('quartz2', 'r')
for i in y[lag:]:
    result = add(result, i, lag, threshold, influence)

# Plot result
pylab.subplot(211)
pylab.plot(np.arange(1, len(y) + 1), y)
pylab.subplot(212)
pylab.step(np.arange(1, len(y) + 1), result['labels'], color='red',
           lw=2)
pylab.ylim(-1.5, 1.5)
pylab.show()

我在我的机器人项目中需要这样的东西。我想我可以归还Kotlin实现。

/**
* Smoothed zero-score alogrithm shamelessly copied from https://stackoverflow.com/a/22640362/6029703
* Uses a rolling mean and a rolling deviation (separate) to identify peaks in a vector
*
* @param y - The input vector to analyze
* @param lag - The lag of the moving window (i.e. how big the window is)
* @param threshold - The z-score at which the algorithm signals (i.e. how many standard deviations away from the moving mean a peak (or signal) is)
* @param influence - The influence (between 0 and 1) of new signals on the mean and standard deviation (how much a peak (or signal) should affect other values near it)
* @return - The calculated averages (avgFilter) and deviations (stdFilter), and the signals (signals)
*/
fun smoothedZScore(y: List<Double>, lag: Int, threshold: Double, influence: Double): Triple<List<Int>, List<Double>, List<Double>> {
    val stats = SummaryStatistics()
    // the results (peaks, 1 or -1) of our algorithm
    val signals = MutableList<Int>(y.size, { 0 })
    // filter out the signals (peaks) from our original list (using influence arg)
    val filteredY = ArrayList<Double>(y)
    // the current average of the rolling window
    val avgFilter = MutableList<Double>(y.size, { 0.0 })
    // the current standard deviation of the rolling window
    val stdFilter = MutableList<Double>(y.size, { 0.0 })
    // init avgFilter and stdFilter
    y.take(lag).forEach { s -> stats.addValue(s) }
    avgFilter[lag - 1] = stats.mean
    stdFilter[lag - 1] = Math.sqrt(stats.populationVariance) // getStandardDeviation() uses sample variance (not what we want)
    stats.clear()
    //loop input starting at end of rolling window
    (lag..y.size - 1).forEach { i ->
        //if the distance between the current value and average is enough standard deviations (threshold) away
        if (Math.abs(y[i] - avgFilter[i - 1]) > threshold * stdFilter[i - 1]) {
            //this is a signal (i.e. peak), determine if it is a positive or negative signal
            signals[i] = if (y[i] > avgFilter[i - 1]) 1 else -1
            //filter this signal out using influence
            filteredY[i] = (influence * y[i]) + ((1 - influence) * filteredY[i - 1])
        } else {
            //ensure this signal remains a zero
            signals[i] = 0
            //ensure this value is not filtered
            filteredY[i] = y[i]
        }
        //update rolling average and deviation
        (i - lag..i - 1).forEach { stats.addValue(filteredY[it]) }
        avgFilter[i] = stats.getMean()
        stdFilter[i] = Math.sqrt(stats.getPopulationVariance()) //getStandardDeviation() uses sample variance (not what we want)
        stats.clear()
    }
    return Triple(signals, avgFilter, stdFilter)
}

带有验证图的示例项目可以在github上找到。