对于更传统的寻路算法的替代方案，您可以看看(名称很合适!)吃豆人气味反对象模式。

你可以在启动时在迷宫中弥漫怪物洞的气味，然后让眼睛跟着它回家。

气味设置好后，运行成本非常低。

编辑:很遗憾维基百科上的文章已经被删除了，所以WayBack Machine来拯救…

知道吃豆人的路径是非随机的(例如，每个特定的关卡0-255,inky, blinky, pinky和clyde将在该关卡中工作完全相同的路径)。

我会选择这个，然后猜测有一些主路径围绕整个 迷宫是眼球物体的“返回路径”，当吃豆人吃掉幽灵时，它就在那里。

简而言之，不是很好。如果你改变了《吃豆人》迷宫，眼睛就不一定会回来。有些四处游荡的黑客就有这个问题。所以它依赖于一个合作迷宫。

我认为你的解决方案是正确的，比这更简单，就是制作一个更“现实”的新版本，鬼魂的眼睛可以穿过墙壁=)

最初的《吃豆人》并没有使用寻径或花哨的AI。它只是让玩家觉得游戏比实际更有深度，但实际上它是随机的。正如Ian Millington和John Funge在《ai Intelligence for Games》中所述。

Not sure if it's true or not, but it makes a lot of sense to me. Honestly, I don't see these behaviors that people are talking about. Red/Blinky for ex is not following the player at all times, as they say. Nobody seems to be consistently following the player, on purpose. The chance that they will follow you looks random to me. And it's just very tempting to see behavior in randomness, especially when the chances of getting chased are very high, with 4 enemies and very limited turning options, in a small space. At least in its initial implementation, the game was extremely simple. Check out the book, it's in one of the first chapters.

假设你已经有了追逐吃豆人所需的逻辑，为什么不重用它呢?只要改变目标。这似乎比尝试使用完全相同的逻辑创建一个全新的例程要少得多。