你可以简单地使用Pandas这样做:

import pandas as pd
pd.Series([[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6], [7], [8, 9]]).sum()

要插入深厚的数据结构,请使用 iteration_utilities.deepflatten1:

>>> from iteration_utilities import deepflatten

>>> l = [[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6], [7], [8, 9]]
>>> list(deepflatten(l, depth=1))
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]

>>> l = [[1, 2, 3], [4, [5, 6]], 7, [8, 9]]
>>> list(deepflatten(l))
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]

这是一个发电机,所以你需要将结果投到列表中,或者明确地对其进行调解。

要单一的平面,如果每一个项目本身是不可分割的,你也可以使用 iteration_utilities.flatten 它本身只是一个薄的旋转器周围 itertools.chain.from_iterable:

>>> from iteration_utilities import flatten
>>> l = [[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6], [7], [8, 9]]
>>> list(flatten(l))
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]

只需添加一些时间表(基于Nico Schlömer的答案,其中不包含此答案中的功能):

此分類上一篇

结果表明,如果 iterable 只包含几个内部 iterables 那么 总数将是最快的,但是,对于长期 iterables 只有 itertools.chain.from_iterable, iteration_utilities.deepflatten 或 nested 理解具有合理的性能, itertools.chain.from_iterable 是最快的(如 Nico Schlömer 已经注意到)。

from itertools import chain
from functools import reduce
from collections import Iterable  # or from collections.abc import Iterable
import operator
from iteration_utilities import deepflatten

def nested_list_comprehension(lsts):
    return [item for sublist in lsts for item in sublist]

def itertools_chain_from_iterable(lsts):
    return list(chain.from_iterable(lsts))

def pythons_sum(lsts):
    return sum(lsts, [])

def reduce_add(lsts):
    return reduce(lambda x, y: x + y, lsts)

def pylangs_flatten(lsts):
    return list(flatten(lsts))

def flatten(items):
    """Yield items from any nested iterable; see REF."""
    for x in items:
        if isinstance(x, Iterable) and not isinstance(x, (str, bytes)):
            yield from flatten(x)
        else:
            yield x

def reduce_concat(lsts):
    return reduce(operator.concat, lsts)

def iteration_utilities_deepflatten(lsts):
    return list(deepflatten(lsts, depth=1))


from simple_benchmark import benchmark

b = benchmark(
    [nested_list_comprehension, itertools_chain_from_iterable, pythons_sum, reduce_add,
     pylangs_flatten, reduce_concat, iteration_utilities_deepflatten],
    arguments={2**i: [[0]*5]*(2**i) for i in range(1, 13)},
    argument_name='number of inner lists'
)

b.plot()

1 Disclaimer:我是该图书馆的作者

def flatten_array(arr):
  result = []
  for item in arr:
    if isinstance(item, list):
      for num in item:
        result.append(num)
    else:
      result.append(item)
  return result

print(flatten_array([1, 2, [3, 4, 5], 6, [7, 8], 9]))
// output: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]

如果你想清理一切,并保持一个单独的元素列表,你也可以使用它。

list_of_lists = [[1,2], [2,3], [3,4]]
list(set.union(*[set(s) for s in list_of_lists]))

对于包含多个列表的列表,这里是一个重复的解决方案,为我工作,我希望它是正确的:

# Question 4
def flatten(input_ls=[]) -> []:
    res_ls = []
    res_ls = flatten_recursive(input_ls, res_ls)

    print("Final flatten list solution is: \n", res_ls)

    return res_ls


def flatten_recursive(input_ls=[], res_ls=[]) -> []:
    tmp_ls = []

    for i in input_ls:
        if isinstance(i, int):
            res_ls.append(i)
        else:
            tmp_ls = i
            tmp_ls.append(flatten_recursive(i, res_ls))

    print(res_ls)
    return res_ls


flatten([0, 1, [2, 3], 4, [5, 6]])  # test
flatten([0, [[[1]]], [[2, 3], [4, [[5, 6]]]]])

出口:

[0, 1, 2, 3]
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
Final flatten list solution is: 
 [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
[0, 1]
[0, 1]
[0, 1]
[0, 1, 2, 3]
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
Final flatten list solution is: 
 [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

不是一个单行,但看到所有的答案在这里,我猜这个漫长的列表错过了一些模式匹配,所以在这里它是:)

这两种方法可能不是有效的,但无论如何,它很容易阅读(至少对我来说,也许我被功能编程所困扰):

def flat(x):
    match x:
        case []:
            return []
        case [[*sublist], *r]:
            return [*sublist, *flat(r)]

第二版考虑了列表列表的列表......不管什么:

def flat(x):
    match x:
        case []:
            return []
        case [[*sublist], *r]:
            return [*flat(sublist), *flat(r)]
        case [h, *r]:
            return [h, *flat(r)]