我有一些单元测试,期望“当前时间”与DateTime不同。显然,我不想改变电脑的时间。
实现这一目标的最佳策略是什么?
我有一些单元测试,期望“当前时间”与DateTime不同。显然,我不想改变电脑的时间。
实现这一目标的最佳策略是什么?
当前回答
为系统添加一个假程序集(右键单击System reference=>添加假程序集)。
并在测试方法中写入:
using (ShimsContext.Create())
{
System.Fakes.ShimDateTime.NowGet = () => new DateTime(2014, 3, 10);
MethodThatUsesDateTimeNow();
}
其他回答
最好的策略是将当前时间封装在一个抽象中,并将该抽象注入到使用者中。
或者,你也可以将时间抽象定义为环境上下文:
public abstract class TimeProvider
{
private static TimeProvider current =
DefaultTimeProvider.Instance;
public static TimeProvider Current
{
get { return TimeProvider.current; }
set
{
if (value == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException("value");
}
TimeProvider.current = value;
}
}
public abstract DateTime UtcNow { get; }
public static void ResetToDefault()
{
TimeProvider.current = DefaultTimeProvider.Instance;
}
}
这将使你能够像这样消费它:
var now = TimeProvider.Current.UtcNow;
在单元测试中,您可以替换TimeProvider。当前带有Test Double/Mock对象。使用Moq的例子:
var timeMock = new Mock<TimeProvider>();
timeMock.SetupGet(tp => tp.UtcNow).Returns(new DateTime(2010, 3, 11));
TimeProvider.Current = timeMock.Object;
但是,当使用静态状态进行单元测试时,始终记得通过调用TimeProvider.ResetToDefault()来删除fixture。
以下是我对这个问题的回答。我将“环境上下文”模式与IDisposable结合起来。你可以使用DateTimeProvider。当前在您的正常程序代码和测试中,您使用using语句覆盖范围。
using System;
using System.Collections.Immutable;
namespace ambientcontext {
public abstract class DateTimeProvider : IDisposable
{
private static ImmutableStack<DateTimeProvider> stack = ImmutableStack<DateTimeProvider>.Empty.Push(new DefaultDateTimeProvider());
protected DateTimeProvider()
{
if (this.GetType() != typeof(DefaultDateTimeProvider))
stack = stack.Push(this);
}
public static DateTimeProvider Current => stack.Peek();
public abstract DateTime Today { get; }
public abstract DateTime Now {get; }
public void Dispose()
{
if (this.GetType() != typeof(DefaultDateTimeProvider))
stack = stack.Pop();
}
// Not visible Default Implementation
private class DefaultDateTimeProvider : DateTimeProvider {
public override DateTime Today => DateTime.Today;
public override DateTime Now => DateTime.Now;
}
}
}
下面是如何在单元测试中使用上述DateTimeProvider
using System;
using Xunit;
namespace ambientcontext
{
public class TestDateTimeProvider
{
[Fact]
public void TestDateTime()
{
var actual = DateTimeProvider.Current.Today;
var expected = DateTime.Today;
Assert.Equal<DateTime>(expected, actual);
using (new MyDateTimeProvider(new DateTime(2012,12,21)))
{
Assert.Equal(2012, DateTimeProvider.Current.Today.Year);
using (new MyDateTimeProvider(new DateTime(1984,4,4)))
{
Assert.Equal(1984, DateTimeProvider.Current.Today.Year);
}
Assert.Equal(2012, DateTimeProvider.Current.Today.Year);
}
// Fall-Back to Default DateTimeProvider
Assert.Equal<int>(expected.Year, DateTimeProvider.Current.Today.Year);
}
private class MyDateTimeProvider : DateTimeProvider
{
private readonly DateTime dateTime;
public MyDateTimeProvider(DateTime dateTime):base()
{
this.dateTime = dateTime;
}
public override DateTime Today => this.dateTime.Date;
public override DateTime Now => this.dateTime;
}
}
}
摩尔数:
[Test]
public void TestOfDateTime()
{
var firstValue = DateTime.Now;
MDateTime.NowGet = () => new DateTime(2000,1,1);
var secondValue = DateTime.Now;
Assert(firstValue > secondValue); // would be false if 'moleing' failed
}
免责声明-我工作的鼹鼠
下面的代码为我工作:
bizDeedMock.Verify(p => p.SetDeed(It.Is<DsPostList>(x => x.PostLists[0].registerDate.Year == DateTime.Now.Year)));
bizDeedMock.Verify(p => p.SetDeed(It.Is<DsPostList>(x => x.PostLists[0].registerDate.Month == DateTime.Now.Month)));
bizDeedMock.Verify(p => p.SetDeed(It.Is<DsPostList>(x => x.PostLists[0].registerDate.Day == DateTime.Now.Day)));
我也有同样的问题,但我在想我们不应该在同一类上使用设置日期时间的东西。因为有一天可能会导致滥用。我使用了提供商
public class DateTimeProvider
{
protected static DateTime? DateTimeNow;
protected static DateTime? DateTimeUtcNow;
public DateTime Now
{
get
{
return DateTimeNow ?? System.DateTime.Now;
}
}
public DateTime UtcNow
{
get
{
return DateTimeUtcNow ?? System.DateTime.UtcNow;
}
}
public static DateTimeProvider DateTime
{
get
{
return new DateTimeProvider();
}
}
protected DateTimeProvider()
{
}
}
对于测试,在测试项目中创建了一个助手来处理设置的事情,
public class MockDateTimeProvider : DateTimeProvider
{
public static void SetNow(DateTime now)
{
DateTimeNow = now;
}
public static void SetUtcNow(DateTime utc)
{
DateTimeUtcNow = utc;
}
public static void RestoreAsDefault()
{
DateTimeNow = null;
DateTimeUtcNow = null;
}
}
在代码
var dateTimeNow = DateTimeProvider.DateTime.Now //not DateTime.Now
var dateTimeUtcNow = DateTimeProvider.DateTime.UtcNow //not DateTime.UtcNow
在测试中
[Test]
public void Mocked_Now()
{
DateTime now = DateTime.Now;
MockDateTimeProvider.SetNow(now); //set to mock
Assert.AreEqual(now, DateTimeProvider.DateTime.Now);
Assert.AreNotEqual(now, DateTimeProvider.DateTime.UtcNow);
}
[Test]
public void Mocked_UtcNow()
{
DateTime utcNow = DateTime.UtcNow;
MockDateTimeProvider.SetUtcNow(utcNow); //set to mock
Assert.AreEqual(utcNow, DateTimeProvider.DateTime.UtcNow);
Assert.AreNotEqual(utcNow, DateTimeProvider.DateTime.Now);
}
但需要记住一件事,有时真正的DateTime和提供程序的DateTime并不相同
[Test]
public void Now()
{
Assert.AreEqual(DateTime.Now.Kind, DateTimeProvider.DateTime.Now.Kind);
Assert.LessOrEqual(DateTime.Now, DateTimeProvider.DateTime.Now);
Assert.LessOrEqual(DateTimeProvider.DateTime.Now - DateTime.Now, TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(1));
}
我假设差异是maximum TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(0.00002)。但大多数时候甚至更少
在MockSamples中找到样本