如何将一个数除3而不使用*、/、+、-、%等运算符?
号码可以有签名,也可以没有签名。
如何将一个数除3而不使用*、/、+、-、%等运算符?
号码可以有签名,也可以没有签名。
当前回答
我会用这段代码除所有正数,非浮点数。基本上你要把除数位向左对齐以匹配被除数位。对于被除数的每一段(除数的大小),你想要检查是否被除数的每一段大于除数,然后你想要左Shift,然后在第一个注册器中OR。这个概念最初是在2004年创建的(我相信是斯坦福大学),这里是一个C版本,它使用了这个概念。注:(我做了一点修改)
int divide(int a, int b)
{
int c = 0, r = 32, i = 32, p = a + 1;
unsigned long int d = 0x80000000;
while ((b & d) == 0)
{
d >>= 1;
r--;
}
while (p > a)
{
c <<= 1;
p = (b >> i--) & ((1 << r) - 1);
if (p >= a)
c |= 1;
}
return c; //p is remainder (for modulus)
}
使用示例:
int n = divide( 3, 6); //outputs 2
其他回答
你可以考虑用图或树状结构来解决这个问题。基本上生成的顶点数与要除以3的数一样多。然后继续将每个未配对的顶点与其他两个顶点配对。
粗糙的伪代码:
function divide(int num)
while(num!=0)
Add a new vertice to vertiexList.
num--
quotient = 0
for each in vertexList(lets call this vertex A)
if vertexList not empty
Add an edge between A and another vertex(say B)
else
your Remainder is 1 and Quotient is quotient
if vertexList not empty
Add an edge between A and another vertex(say C)
else
your remainder is 2 and Quotient is quotient
quotient++
remove A, B, C from vertexList
Remainder is 0 and Quotient is quotient
这显然是可以优化的,复杂度取决于你的数字有多大,但它应该工作,只要你能做++和——。 这就像数更酷的东西一样。
如果你提醒自己标准的学校除法方法,用二进制来做,你会发现在3的情况下,你只是在有限的一组值中除法和减法(在这种情况下,从0到5)。这些可以用switch语句处理,以摆脱算术运算符。
static unsigned lamediv3(unsigned n)
{
unsigned result = 0, remainder = 0, mask = 0x80000000;
// Go through all bits of n from MSB to LSB.
for (int i = 0; i < 32; i++, mask >>= 1)
{
result <<= 1;
// Shift in the next bit of n into remainder.
remainder = remainder << 1 | !!(n & mask);
// Divide remainder by 3, update result and remainer.
// If remainder is less than 3, it remains intact.
switch (remainder)
{
case 3:
result |= 1;
remainder = 0;
break;
case 4:
result |= 1;
remainder = 1;
break;
case 5:
result |= 1;
remainder = 2;
break;
}
}
return result;
}
#include <cstdio>
int main()
{
// Verify for all possible values of a 32-bit unsigned integer.
unsigned i = 0;
do
{
unsigned d = lamediv3(i);
if (i / 3 != d)
{
printf("failed for %u: %u != %u\n", i, d, i / 3);
return 1;
}
}
while (++i != 0);
}
#!/bin/ruby
def div_by_3(i)
i.div 3 # always return int http://www.ruby-doc.org/core-1.9.3/Numeric.html#method-i-div
end
Yet another solution. This should handle all ints (including negative ints) except the min value of an int, which would need to be handled as a hard coded exception. This basically does division by subtraction but only using bit operators (shifts, xor, & and complement). For faster speed, it subtracts 3 * (decreasing powers of 2). In c#, it executes around 444 of these DivideBy3 calls per millisecond (2.2 seconds for 1,000,000 divides), so not horrendously slow, but no where near as fast as a simple x/3. By comparison, Coodey's nice solution is about 5 times faster than this one.
public static int DivideBy3(int a) {
bool negative = a < 0;
if (negative) a = Negate(a);
int result;
int sub = 3 << 29;
int threes = 1 << 29;
result = 0;
while (threes > 0) {
if (a >= sub) {
a = Add(a, Negate(sub));
result = Add(result, threes);
}
sub >>= 1;
threes >>= 1;
}
if (negative) result = Negate(result);
return result;
}
public static int Negate(int a) {
return Add(~a, 1);
}
public static int Add(int a, int b) {
int x = 0;
x = a ^ b;
while ((a & b) != 0) {
b = (a & b) << 1;
a = x;
x = a ^ b;
}
return x;
}
这是c#,因为这是我手边的东西,但与c的区别应该很小。
这应该适用于任何除数,而不仅仅是3。目前仅适用于unsigned,但将其扩展到signed应该没有那么困难。
#include <stdio.h>
unsigned sub(unsigned two, unsigned one);
unsigned bitdiv(unsigned top, unsigned bot);
unsigned sub(unsigned two, unsigned one)
{
unsigned bor;
bor = one;
do {
one = ~two & bor;
two ^= bor;
bor = one<<1;
} while (one);
return two;
}
unsigned bitdiv(unsigned top, unsigned bot)
{
unsigned result, shift;
if (!bot || top < bot) return 0;
for(shift=1;top >= (bot<<=1); shift++) {;}
bot >>= 1;
for (result=0; shift--; bot >>= 1 ) {
result <<=1;
if (top >= bot) {
top = sub(top,bot);
result |= 1;
}
}
return result;
}
int main(void)
{
unsigned arg,val;
for (arg=2; arg < 40; arg++) {
val = bitdiv(arg,3);
printf("Arg=%u Val=%u\n", arg, val);
}
return 0;
}