优雅的解决方案

List<Integer> list = Arrays.asList(1,2,3,4);
list.stream()
    .sorted(Collections.reverseOrder()) // Method on Stream<Integer>
    .forEach(System.out::println);

ArrayDeque在堆栈中比stack或LinkedList更快。"push()"将元素插入到Deque的前面

 protected <T> Stream<T> reverse(Stream<T> stream) {
    ArrayDeque<T> stack = new ArrayDeque<>();
    stream.forEach(stack::push);
    return stack.stream();
}

基于@stuart-marks的答案，但没有强制转换，函数返回从end开始的列表元素流:

public static <T> Stream<T> reversedStream(List<T> tList) {
    final int size = tList.size();
    return IntStream.range(0, size)
            .mapToObj(i -> tList.get(size - 1 - i));
}

// usage
reversedStream(list).forEach(System.out::println);

最简单的方法(simple collect -支持并行流):

public static <T> Stream<T> reverse(Stream<T> stream) {
    return stream
            .collect(Collector.of(
                    () -> new ArrayDeque<T>(),
                    ArrayDeque::addFirst,
                    (q1, q2) -> { q2.addAll(q1); return q2; })
            )
            .stream();
}

高级方式(以持续的方式支持并行流):

public static <T> Stream<T> reverse(Stream<T> stream) {
    Objects.requireNonNull(stream, "stream");

    class ReverseSpliterator implements Spliterator<T> {
        private Spliterator<T> spliterator;
        private final Deque<T> deque = new ArrayDeque<>();

        private ReverseSpliterator(Spliterator<T> spliterator) {
            this.spliterator = spliterator;
        }

        @Override
        @SuppressWarnings({"StatementWithEmptyBody"})
        public boolean tryAdvance(Consumer<? super T> action) {
            while(spliterator.tryAdvance(deque::addFirst));
            if(!deque.isEmpty()) {
                action.accept(deque.remove());
                return true;
            }
            return false;
        }

        @Override
        public Spliterator<T> trySplit() {
            // After traveling started the spliterator don't contain elements!
            Spliterator<T> prev = spliterator.trySplit();
            if(prev == null) {
                return null;
            }

            Spliterator<T> me = spliterator;
            spliterator = prev;
            return new ReverseSpliterator(me);
        }

        @Override
        public long estimateSize() {
            return spliterator.estimateSize();
        }

        @Override
        public int characteristics() {
            return spliterator.characteristics();
        }

        @Override
        public Comparator<? super T> getComparator() {
            Comparator<? super T> comparator = spliterator.getComparator();
            return (comparator != null) ? comparator.reversed() : null;
        }

        @Override
        public void forEachRemaining(Consumer<? super T> action) {
            // Ensure that tryAdvance is called at least once
            if(!deque.isEmpty() || tryAdvance(action)) {
                deque.forEach(action);
            }
        }
    }

    return StreamSupport.stream(new ReverseSpliterator(stream.spliterator()), stream.isParallel());
}

注意，您可以快速扩展到其他类型的流(IntStream，…)。

测试:

// Use parallel if you wish only
revert(Stream.of("One", "Two", "Three", "Four", "Five", "Six").parallel())
    .forEachOrdered(System.out::println);

结果:

Six
Five
Four
Three
Two
One

其他注意事项:最简单的方法是，当它与其他流操作一起使用时就不那么有用了(收集连接破坏了并行性)。前进的方式就没有这个问题，它也保持了流的初始特征，比如排序，所以，它是在反向操作之后用于其他流操作的方式。

最简单的解决方案是使用List::listIterator和Stream::generate

List<Integer> list = Arrays.asList(1, 2, 3, 4, 5);
ListIterator<Integer> listIterator = list.listIterator(list.size());

Stream.generate(listIterator::previous)
      .limit(list.size())
      .forEach(System.out::println);

如果实现Comparable<T> (ex. Integer, String, Date)，则可以使用Comparator.reverseOrder()来实现。

List<Integer> list = Arrays.asList(1, 2, 3, 4);
list.stream()
     .sorted(Comparator.reverseOrder())
     .forEach(System.out::println);