基于@stuart-marks的答案，但没有强制转换，函数返回从end开始的列表元素流:

public static <T> Stream<T> reversedStream(List<T> tList) {
    final int size = tList.size();
    return IntStream.range(0, size)
            .mapToObj(i -> tList.get(size - 1 - i));
}

// usage
reversedStream(list).forEach(System.out::println);

关于生成反向IntStream的具体问题:

从Java 9开始，你可以使用三个参数版本的IntStream.iterate(…):

IntStream.iterate(10, x -> x >= 0, x -> x - 1).forEach(System.out::println);

// Out: 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

地点:

IntStream。迭代(int seed, IntPredicate hasNext, IntUnaryOperator next);

种子——初始元素; hasNext -应用于元素的谓词，以确定何时 流必须终止; Next -应用于前一个元素的函数，以生成一个 新元素。

如何避免这样做:

不要使用.sorted(Comparator.reverseOrder())或.sorted(Collections.reverseOrder())，因为它只会按降序排序元素。 对于给定的Integer输入使用它: [1,4,2,5,3] 输出结果如下: [5,4,3,2,1] 对于字符串输入: [" a "， " d "， " b "， " e "， " c "] 输出结果如下: [e, d, c, b, a] 不要使用.sorted((a, b) -> -1)(后面的解释)

最简单的正确方法是:

List<Integer> list = Arrays.asList(1, 4, 2, 5, 3);
Collections.reverse(list);
System.out.println(list);

输出: [3,5,2,4,1]

String也一样:

List<String> stringList = Arrays.asList("A", "D", "B", "E", "C");
Collections.reverse(stringList);
System.out.println(stringList);

输出: [c, e, b, d, a]

不要使用.sorted((a, b) -> -1)! 它打破了比较国契约，可能只适用于某些情况。只在单线程上，而不是并行。 洋基的解释:

(a, b) -> -1打破了Comparator的契约。这是否有效取决于排序算法的实现。JVM的下一个版本可能会打破这一点。实际上，我已经可以在我的机器上使用IntStream重复地打破这个。.boxed范围(0 10000).parallel()()。sorted((a, b) -> -1).forEachOrdered(System.out::println);

//Don't use this!!!
List<Integer> list = Arrays.asList(1, 4, 2, 5, 3);
List<Integer> reversedList = list.stream()
        .sorted((a, b) -> -1)
        .collect(Collectors.toList());
System.out.println(reversedList);

正数输出: [3,5,2,4,1]

可能的输出在并行流或与其他JVM实现: [4,1,2,3,5]

String也一样:

//Don't use this!!!
List<String> stringList = Arrays.asList("A", "D", "B", "E", "C");
List<String> reversedStringList = stringList.stream()
        .sorted((a, b) -> -1)
        .collect(Collectors.toList());
System.out.println(reversedStringList);

正数输出: [c, e, b, d, a]

可能的输出在并行流或与其他JVM实现: [a, e, b, d, c]

我就是这么做的。

我不喜欢创建一个新集合并反向迭代它的想法。

IntStream#映射的想法是非常整洁的，但我更喜欢IntStream#迭代方法，因为我认为倒计时到零的想法更好地表达了迭代方法，更容易理解从后面到前面的数组行走。

import static java.lang.Math.max;

private static final double EXACT_MATCH = 0d;

public static IntStream reverseStream(final int[] array) {
    return countdownFrom(array.length - 1).map(index -> array[index]);
}

public static DoubleStream reverseStream(final double[] array) {
    return countdownFrom(array.length - 1).mapToDouble(index -> array[index]);
}

public static <T> Stream<T> reverseStream(final T[] array) {
    return countdownFrom(array.length - 1).mapToObj(index -> array[index]);
}

public static IntStream countdownFrom(final int top) {
    return IntStream.iterate(top, t -> t - 1).limit(max(0, (long) top + 1));
}

下面是一些测试来证明它是有效的:

import static java.lang.Integer.MAX_VALUE;
import static org.junit.Assert.*;

@Test
public void testReverseStream_emptyArrayCreatesEmptyStream() {
    Assert.assertEquals(0, reverseStream(new double[0]).count());
}

@Test
public void testReverseStream_singleElementCreatesSingleElementStream() {
    Assert.assertEquals(1, reverseStream(new double[1]).count());
    final double[] singleElementArray = new double[] { 123.4 };
    assertArrayEquals(singleElementArray, reverseStream(singleElementArray).toArray(), EXACT_MATCH);
}

@Test
public void testReverseStream_multipleElementsAreStreamedInReversedOrder() {
    final double[] arr = new double[] { 1d, 2d, 3d };
    final double[] revArr = new double[] { 3d, 2d, 1d };
    Assert.assertEquals(arr.length, reverseStream(arr).count());
    Assert.assertArrayEquals(revArr, reverseStream(arr).toArray(), EXACT_MATCH);
}

@Test
public void testCountdownFrom_returnsAllElementsFromTopToZeroInReverseOrder() {
    assertArrayEquals(new int[] { 4, 3, 2, 1, 0 }, countdownFrom(4).toArray());
}

@Test
public void testCountdownFrom_countingDownStartingWithZeroOutputsTheNumberZero() {
    assertArrayEquals(new int[] { 0 }, countdownFrom(0).toArray());
}

@Test
public void testCountdownFrom_doesNotChokeOnIntegerMaxValue() {
    assertEquals(true, countdownFrom(MAX_VALUE).anyMatch(x -> x == MAX_VALUE));
}

@Test
public void testCountdownFrom_givesZeroLengthCountForNegativeValues() {
    assertArrayEquals(new int[0], countdownFrom(-1).toArray());
    assertArrayEquals(new int[0], countdownFrom(-4).toArray());
}

反转字符串或任何数组

(Stream.of("abcdefghijklm 1234567".split("")).collect(Collectors.collectingAndThen(Collectors.toList(),list -> {Collections.reverse(list);return list;}))).stream().forEach(System.out::println);

Split可以根据分隔符或空格进行修改

你可以定义自己的收集器，按相反的顺序收集元素:

public static <T> Collector<T, List<T>, List<T>> inReverse() {
    return Collector.of(
        ArrayList::new,
        (l, t) -> l.add(t),
        (l, r) -> {l.addAll(r); return l;},
        Lists::<T>reverse);
}

像这样使用它:

stream.collect(inReverse()).forEach(t -> ...)

我使用ArrayList在前向顺序有效地插入收集项(在列表的末尾)，和番石榴列表。Reverse用于有效地提供列表的反向视图，而无需复制另一个列表。

下面是自定义收集器的一些测试用例:

import static org.hamcrest.MatcherAssert.assertThat;
import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.*;

import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.function.BiConsumer;
import java.util.function.BinaryOperator;
import java.util.function.Function;
import java.util.function.Supplier;
import java.util.stream.Collector;

import org.hamcrest.Matchers;
import org.junit.Test;

import com.google.common.collect.Lists;

public class TestReverseCollector {
    private final Object t1 = new Object();
    private final Object t2 = new Object();
    private final Object t3 = new Object();
    private final Object t4 = new Object();

    private final Collector<Object, List<Object>, List<Object>> inReverse = inReverse();
    private final Supplier<List<Object>> supplier = inReverse.supplier();
    private final BiConsumer<List<Object>, Object> accumulator = inReverse.accumulator();
    private final Function<List<Object>, List<Object>> finisher = inReverse.finisher();
    private final BinaryOperator<List<Object>> combiner = inReverse.combiner();

    @Test public void associative() {
        final List<Object> a1 = supplier.get();
        accumulator.accept(a1, t1);
        accumulator.accept(a1, t2);
        final List<Object> r1 = finisher.apply(a1);

        final List<Object> a2 = supplier.get();
        accumulator.accept(a2, t1);
        final List<Object> a3 = supplier.get();
        accumulator.accept(a3, t2);
        final List<Object> r2 = finisher.apply(combiner.apply(a2, a3));

        assertThat(r1, Matchers.equalTo(r2));
    }

    @Test public void identity() {
        final List<Object> a1 = supplier.get();
        accumulator.accept(a1, t1);
        accumulator.accept(a1, t2);
        final List<Object> r1 = finisher.apply(a1);

        final List<Object> a2 = supplier.get();
        accumulator.accept(a2, t1);
        accumulator.accept(a2, t2);
        final List<Object> r2 = finisher.apply(combiner.apply(a2, supplier.get()));

        assertThat(r1, equalTo(r2));
    }

    @Test public void reversing() throws Exception {
        final List<Object> a2 = supplier.get();
        accumulator.accept(a2, t1);
        accumulator.accept(a2, t2);

        final List<Object> a3 = supplier.get();
        accumulator.accept(a3, t3);
        accumulator.accept(a3, t4);

        final List<Object> r2 = finisher.apply(combiner.apply(a2, a3));

        assertThat(r2, contains(t4, t3, t2, t1));
    }

    public static <T> Collector<T, List<T>, List<T>> inReverse() {
        return Collector.of(
            ArrayList::new,
            (l, t) -> l.add(t),
            (l, r) -> {l.addAll(r); return l;},
            Lists::<T>reverse);
    }
}