这里的许多解决方案对IntStream进行排序或反转，但这不必要地需要中间存储。斯图尔特·马克斯的解决方案是可行的:

static IntStream revRange(int from, int to) {
    return IntStream.range(from, to).map(i -> to - i + from - 1);
}

它正确地处理溢出以及，通过这个测试:

@Test
public void testRevRange() {
    assertArrayEquals(revRange(0, 5).toArray(), new int[]{4, 3, 2, 1, 0});
    assertArrayEquals(revRange(-5, 0).toArray(), new int[]{-1, -2, -3, -4, -5});
    assertArrayEquals(revRange(1, 4).toArray(), new int[]{3, 2, 1});
    assertArrayEquals(revRange(0, 0).toArray(), new int[0]);
    assertArrayEquals(revRange(0, -1).toArray(), new int[0]);
    assertArrayEquals(revRange(MIN_VALUE, MIN_VALUE).toArray(), new int[0]);
    assertArrayEquals(revRange(MAX_VALUE, MAX_VALUE).toArray(), new int[0]);
    assertArrayEquals(revRange(MIN_VALUE, MIN_VALUE + 1).toArray(), new int[]{MIN_VALUE});
    assertArrayEquals(revRange(MAX_VALUE - 1, MAX_VALUE).toArray(), new int[]{MAX_VALUE - 1});
}

我们可以编写一个收集器，以相反的顺序收集元素:

public static <T> Collector<T, ?, Stream<T>> reversed() {
    return Collectors.collectingAndThen(Collectors.toList(), list -> {
        Collections.reverse(list);
        return list.stream();
    });
}

像这样使用它:

Stream.of(1, 2, 3, 4, 5).collect(reversed()).forEach(System.out::println);

原来的答案(包含一个错误-它不能正确工作的并行流):

一个通用的流反向方法可以是这样的:

public static <T> Stream<T> reverse(Stream<T> stream) {
    LinkedList<T> stack = new LinkedList<>();
    stream.forEach(stack::push);
    return stack.stream();
}

最简单的方法(simple collect -支持并行流):

public static <T> Stream<T> reverse(Stream<T> stream) {
    return stream
            .collect(Collector.of(
                    () -> new ArrayDeque<T>(),
                    ArrayDeque::addFirst,
                    (q1, q2) -> { q2.addAll(q1); return q2; })
            )
            .stream();
}

高级方式(以持续的方式支持并行流):

public static <T> Stream<T> reverse(Stream<T> stream) {
    Objects.requireNonNull(stream, "stream");

    class ReverseSpliterator implements Spliterator<T> {
        private Spliterator<T> spliterator;
        private final Deque<T> deque = new ArrayDeque<>();

        private ReverseSpliterator(Spliterator<T> spliterator) {
            this.spliterator = spliterator;
        }

        @Override
        @SuppressWarnings({"StatementWithEmptyBody"})
        public boolean tryAdvance(Consumer<? super T> action) {
            while(spliterator.tryAdvance(deque::addFirst));
            if(!deque.isEmpty()) {
                action.accept(deque.remove());
                return true;
            }
            return false;
        }

        @Override
        public Spliterator<T> trySplit() {
            // After traveling started the spliterator don't contain elements!
            Spliterator<T> prev = spliterator.trySplit();
            if(prev == null) {
                return null;
            }

            Spliterator<T> me = spliterator;
            spliterator = prev;
            return new ReverseSpliterator(me);
        }

        @Override
        public long estimateSize() {
            return spliterator.estimateSize();
        }

        @Override
        public int characteristics() {
            return spliterator.characteristics();
        }

        @Override
        public Comparator<? super T> getComparator() {
            Comparator<? super T> comparator = spliterator.getComparator();
            return (comparator != null) ? comparator.reversed() : null;
        }

        @Override
        public void forEachRemaining(Consumer<? super T> action) {
            // Ensure that tryAdvance is called at least once
            if(!deque.isEmpty() || tryAdvance(action)) {
                deque.forEach(action);
            }
        }
    }

    return StreamSupport.stream(new ReverseSpliterator(stream.spliterator()), stream.isParallel());
}

注意，您可以快速扩展到其他类型的流(IntStream，…)。

测试:

// Use parallel if you wish only
revert(Stream.of("One", "Two", "Three", "Four", "Five", "Six").parallel())
    .forEachOrdered(System.out::println);

结果:

Six
Five
Four
Three
Two
One

其他注意事项:最简单的方法是，当它与其他流操作一起使用时就不那么有用了(收集连接破坏了并行性)。前进的方式就没有这个问题，它也保持了流的初始特征，比如排序，所以，它是在反向操作之后用于其他流操作的方式。

这个实用方法怎么样?

public static <T> Stream<T> getReverseStream(List<T> list) {
    final ListIterator<T> listIt = list.listIterator(list.size());
    final Iterator<T> reverseIterator = new Iterator<T>() {
        @Override
        public boolean hasNext() {
            return listIt.hasPrevious();
        }

        @Override
        public T next() {
            return listIt.previous();
        }
    };
    return StreamSupport.stream(Spliterators.spliteratorUnknownSize(
            reverseIterator,
            Spliterator.ORDERED | Spliterator.IMMUTABLE), false);
}

似乎对所有案件都有效，没有重复。

ArrayDeque在堆栈中比stack或LinkedList更快。"push()"将元素插入到Deque的前面

 protected <T> Stream<T> reverse(Stream<T> stream) {
    ArrayDeque<T> stack = new ArrayDeque<>();
    stream.forEach(stack::push);
    return stack.stream();
}

最通用和最简单的反转列表的方法是:

public static <T> void reverseHelper(List<T> li){

 li.stream()
.sorted((x,y)-> -1)
.collect(Collectors.toList())
.forEach(System.out::println);

    }