我通过重写__setattr__创建了不可变类，并且如果调用者是__init__，则允许该集合:

import inspect
class Immutable(object):
    def __setattr__(self, name, value):
        if inspect.stack()[2][3] != "__init__":
            raise Exception("Can't mutate an Immutable: self.%s = %r" % (name, value))
        object.__setattr__(self, name, value)

这还不够，因为它允许任何人的___init__来改变对象，但你懂的。

这种方式不停止对象。__setattr__从工作，但我仍然发现它有用:

class A(object):

    def __new__(cls, children, *args, **kwargs):
        self = super(A, cls).__new__(cls)
        self._frozen = False  # allow mutation from here to end of  __init__
        # other stuff you need to do in __new__ goes here
        return self

    def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
        super(A, self).__init__()
        self._frozen = True  # prevent future mutation

    def __setattr__(self, name, value):
        # need to special case setting _frozen.
        if name != '_frozen' and self._frozen:
            raise TypeError('Instances are immutable.')
        else:
            super(A, self).__setattr__(name, value)

    def __delattr__(self, name):
        if self._frozen:
            raise TypeError('Instances are immutable.')
        else:
            super(A, self).__delattr__(name)

你可能需要根据用例重写更多的东西(比如__setitem__)。

除了其他优秀的答案之外，我喜欢为python 3.4(或者可能是3.3)添加一个方法。这个答案建立在之前对这个问题的几个答案的基础上。

在python 3.4中，可以使用不带设置符的属性来创建不可修改的类成员。(在早期版本中，可以不使用setter为属性赋值。)

class A:
    __slots__=['_A__a']
    def __init__(self, aValue):
      self.__a=aValue
    @property
    def a(self):
        return self.__a

你可以这样使用它:

instance=A("constant")
print (instance.a)

它会输出constant

而是调用实例。A =10会导致:

AttributeError: can't set attribute

解释:不带设置符的属性是python 3.4(我认为是3.3)的最新特性。如果您尝试给这样的属性赋值，则会引发Error。 使用插槽，我将成员变量限制为__A_a(即__a)。

问题:赋值给_aa仍然是可能的(instance. _aa =2)。但是如果你给一个私有变量赋值，那是你自己的错…

然而，这个答案不鼓励使用__slots__。使用其他方法来阻止属性创建可能更可取。

这里有一个优雅的解决方案:

class Immutable(object):
    def __setattr__(self, key, value):
        if not hasattr(self, key):
            super().__setattr__(key, value)
        else:
            raise RuntimeError("Can't modify immutable object's attribute: {}".format(key))

从这个类继承，在构造函数中初始化字段，就完成了所有设置。

另一个想法是完全不允许__setattr__而使用object。构造函数中的__setattr__:

class Point(object):
    def __init__(self, x, y):
        object.__setattr__(self, "x", x)
        object.__setattr__(self, "y", y)
    def __setattr__(self, *args):
        raise TypeError
    def __delattr__(self, *args):
        raise TypeError

当然你可以用object。__setattr__(p， "x"， 3)来修改一个Point实例p，但您的原始实现遭受同样的问题(尝试tuple。__setattr__(i， "x"， 42)在一个不可变实例)。

您可以在原始实现中应用相同的技巧:去掉__getitem__()，并在属性函数中使用tuple.__getitem__()。

从Python 3.7开始，你可以在你的类中使用@dataclass装饰器，它将像结构体一样是不可变的!不过，它可能会也可能不会将__hash__()方法添加到类中。引用:

hash() is used by built-in hash(), and when objects are added to hashed collections such as dictionaries and sets. Having a hash() implies that instances of the class are immutable. Mutability is a complicated property that depends on the programmer’s intent, the existence and behavior of eq(), and the values of the eq and frozen flags in the dataclass() decorator. By default, dataclass() will not implicitly add a hash() method unless it is safe to do so. Neither will it add or change an existing explicitly defined hash() method. Setting the class attribute hash = None has a specific meaning to Python, as described in the hash() documentation. If hash() is not explicit defined, or if it is set to None, then dataclass() may add an implicit hash() method. Although not recommended, you can force dataclass() to create a hash() method with unsafe_hash=True. This might be the case if your class is logically immutable but can nonetheless be mutated. This is a specialized use case and should be considered carefully.

下面是上面链接的文档中的例子:

@dataclass
class InventoryItem:
    '''Class for keeping track of an item in inventory.'''
    name: str
    unit_price: float
    quantity_on_hand: int = 0

    def total_cost(self) -> float:
        return self.unit_price * self.quantity_on_hand