什么是最有效的方式来克隆一个JavaScript对象?我已经看到obj = eval(uneval(o));被使用,但它是非标准的,仅支持Firefox.我做了事情,如obj = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(o));但质疑效率。
当前回答
// obj target object, vals source object
var setVals = function (obj, vals) {
if (obj && vals) {
for (var x in vals) {
if (vals.hasOwnProperty(x)) {
if (obj[x] && typeof vals[x] === 'object') {
obj[x] = setVals(obj[x], vals[x]);
} else {
obj[x] = vals[x];
}
}
}
}
return obj;
};
其他回答
这是我正在使用的:
function cloneObject(obj) {
var clone = {};
for(var i in obj) {
if(typeof(obj[i])=="object" && obj[i] != null)
clone[i] = cloneObject(obj[i]);
else
clone[i] = obj[i];
}
return clone;
}
function clone(obj)
{ var clone = {};
clone.prototype = obj.prototype;
for (property in obj) clone[property] = obj[property];
return clone;
}
结构化克隆
HTML 标准包含一个内部结构化的克隆/序列化算法,可以创建对象的深度克隆,它仍然仅限于某些内置类型,但除了由 JSON 支持的少数类型之外,它还支持日期、RegExps、地图、套件、Blobs、FileLists、ImageDatas、Sparse Arrays、Typed Arrays等。
结构化Clone 全球功能由 Node 17.0 提供:
const clone = structuredClone(original);
以前版本: Node.js 的 v8 模块(如 Node 11 )直接展示了结构化序列化 API,但此功能仍然被标记为“实验性”,并在未来的版本中可更改或删除。
const v8 = require('v8');
const structuredClone = obj => {
return v8.deserialize(v8.serialize(obj));
};
直接支持浏览器:可用于Firefox 94
const clone = structuredClone(original);
class StructuredCloner {
constructor() {
this.pendingClones_ = new Map();
this.nextKey_ = 0;
const channel = new MessageChannel();
this.inPort_ = channel.port1;
this.outPort_ = channel.port2;
this.outPort_.onmessage = ({data: {key, value}}) => {
const resolve = this.pendingClones_.get(key);
resolve(value);
this.pendingClones_.delete(key);
};
this.outPort_.start();
}
cloneAsync(value) {
return new Promise(resolve => {
const key = this.nextKey_++;
this.pendingClones_.set(key, resolve);
this.inPort_.postMessage({key, value});
});
}
}
const structuredCloneAsync = window.structuredCloneAsync =
StructuredCloner.prototype.cloneAsync.bind(new StructuredCloner);
const main = async () => {
const original = { date: new Date(), number: Math.random() };
original.self = original;
const clone = await structuredCloneAsync(original);
// They're different objects:
console.assert(original !== clone);
console.assert(original.date !== clone.date);
// They're cyclical:
console.assert(original.self === original);
console.assert(clone.self === clone);
// They contain equivalent values:
console.assert(original.number === clone.number);
console.assert(Number(original.date) === Number(clone.date));
console.log("Assertions complete.");
};
main();
const structuredClone = obj => {
const oldState = history.state;
history.replaceState(obj, null);
const clonedObj = history.state;
history.replaceState(oldState, null);
return clonedObj;
};
雖然同步,但這可能非常慢。 它發生了所有與操縱瀏覽器歷史相關的頭部. 重複召喚這種方法可能會導致Chrome暫時變成無責任。
const structuredClone = obj => {
const n = new Notification('', {data: obj, silent: true});
n.onshow = n.close.bind(n);
return n.data;
};
如下图所示,John Resig的jQuery克隆器将非数字属性的<unk>转化为非数字属性的对象,而RegDwight的JSON克隆器将非数字属性放下。
function jQueryClone(obj) {
return jQuery.extend(true, {}, obj)
}
function JSONClone(obj) {
return JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(obj))
}
var arrayLikeObj = [[1, "a", "b"], [2, "b", "a"]];
arrayLikeObj.names = ["m", "n", "o"];
var JSONCopy = JSONClone(arrayLikeObj);
var jQueryCopy = jQueryClone(arrayLikeObj);
alert("Is arrayLikeObj an array instance?" + (arrayLikeObj instanceof Array) +
"\nIs the jQueryClone an array instance? " + (jQueryCopy instanceof Array) +
"\nWhat are the arrayLikeObj names? " + arrayLikeObj.names +
"\nAnd what are the JSONClone names? " + JSONCopy.names)
因为回归只是太昂贵的JavaScript,我发现的大多数答案是使用回归,而JSON方法将错过非JSON转换部分(功能等)。所以我做了一些研究,并发现这个拖拉机技术避免它。
/*
* Trampoline to avoid recursion in JavaScript, see:
* https://www.integralist.co.uk/posts/functional-recursive-javascript-programming/
*/
function trampoline() {
var func = arguments[0];
var args = [];
for (var i = 1; i < arguments.length; i++) {
args[i - 1] = arguments[i];
}
var currentBatch = func.apply(this, args);
var nextBatch = [];
while (currentBatch && currentBatch.length > 0) {
currentBatch.forEach(function(eachFunc) {
var ret = eachFunc();
if (ret && ret.length > 0) {
nextBatch = nextBatch.concat(ret);
}
});
currentBatch = nextBatch;
nextBatch = [];
}
};
/*
* Deep clone an object using the trampoline technique.
*
* @param target {Object} Object to clone
* @return {Object} Cloned object.
*/
function clone(target) {
if (typeof target !== 'object') {
return target;
}
if (target == null || Object.keys(target).length == 0) {
return target;
}
function _clone(b, a) {
var nextBatch = [];
for (var key in b) {
if (typeof b[key] === 'object' && b[key] !== null) {
if (b[key] instanceof Array) {
a[key] = [];
}
else {
a[key] = {};
}
nextBatch.push(_clone.bind(null, b[key], a[key]));
}
else {
a[key] = b[key];
}
}
return nextBatch;
};
var ret = target instanceof Array ? [] : {};
(trampoline.bind(null, _clone))(target, ret);
return ret;
};