什么是最有效的方式来克隆一个JavaScript对象?我已经看到obj = eval(uneval(o));被使用,但它是非标准的,仅支持Firefox.我做了事情,如obj = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(o));但质疑效率。
当前回答
结构化克隆
HTML 标准包含一个内部结构化的克隆/序列化算法,可以创建对象的深度克隆,它仍然仅限于某些内置类型,但除了由 JSON 支持的少数类型之外,它还支持日期、RegExps、地图、套件、Blobs、FileLists、ImageDatas、Sparse Arrays、Typed Arrays等。
结构化Clone 全球功能由 Node 17.0 提供:
const clone = structuredClone(original);
以前版本: Node.js 的 v8 模块(如 Node 11 )直接展示了结构化序列化 API,但此功能仍然被标记为“实验性”,并在未来的版本中可更改或删除。
const v8 = require('v8');
const structuredClone = obj => {
return v8.deserialize(v8.serialize(obj));
};
直接支持浏览器:可用于Firefox 94
const clone = structuredClone(original);
class StructuredCloner {
constructor() {
this.pendingClones_ = new Map();
this.nextKey_ = 0;
const channel = new MessageChannel();
this.inPort_ = channel.port1;
this.outPort_ = channel.port2;
this.outPort_.onmessage = ({data: {key, value}}) => {
const resolve = this.pendingClones_.get(key);
resolve(value);
this.pendingClones_.delete(key);
};
this.outPort_.start();
}
cloneAsync(value) {
return new Promise(resolve => {
const key = this.nextKey_++;
this.pendingClones_.set(key, resolve);
this.inPort_.postMessage({key, value});
});
}
}
const structuredCloneAsync = window.structuredCloneAsync =
StructuredCloner.prototype.cloneAsync.bind(new StructuredCloner);
const main = async () => {
const original = { date: new Date(), number: Math.random() };
original.self = original;
const clone = await structuredCloneAsync(original);
// They're different objects:
console.assert(original !== clone);
console.assert(original.date !== clone.date);
// They're cyclical:
console.assert(original.self === original);
console.assert(clone.self === clone);
// They contain equivalent values:
console.assert(original.number === clone.number);
console.assert(Number(original.date) === Number(clone.date));
console.log("Assertions complete.");
};
main();
const structuredClone = obj => {
const oldState = history.state;
history.replaceState(obj, null);
const clonedObj = history.state;
history.replaceState(oldState, null);
return clonedObj;
};
雖然同步,但這可能非常慢。 它發生了所有與操縱瀏覽器歷史相關的頭部. 重複召喚這種方法可能會導致Chrome暫時變成無責任。
const structuredClone = obj => {
const n = new Notification('', {data: obj, silent: true});
n.onshow = n.close.bind(n);
return n.data;
};
其他回答
需要新的浏览器,但...
让我们扩展本地对象并获得一个真正的.extend();
Object.defineProperty(Object.prototype, 'extend', {
enumerable: false,
value: function(){
var that = this;
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments).map(function(source){
var props = Object.getOwnPropertyNames(source),
i = 0, l = props.length,
prop;
for(; i < l; ++i){
prop = props[i];
if(that.hasOwnProperty(prop) && typeof(that[prop]) === 'object'){
that[prop] = that[prop].extend(source[prop]);
}else{
Object.defineProperty(that, prop, Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(source, prop));
}
}
});
return this;
}
});
只需在任何使用.extend() 对象的代码之前点击它。
例子:
var obj1 = {
node1: '1',
node2: '2',
node3: 3
};
var obj2 = {
node1: '4',
node2: 5,
node3: '6'
};
var obj3 = ({}).extend(obj1, obj2);
console.log(obj3);
// Object {node1: "4", node2: 5, node3: "6"}
有这么多方法可以实现这一点,但如果你想做到这一点没有任何图书馆,你可以使用以下方式:
const cloneObject = (oldObject) => {
let newObject = oldObject;
if (oldObject && typeof oldObject === 'object') {
if(Array.isArray(oldObject)) {
newObject = [];
} else if (Object.prototype.toString.call(oldObject) === '[object Date]' && !isNaN(oldObject)) {
newObject = new Date(oldObject.getTime());
} else {
newObject = {};
for (let i in oldObject) {
newObject[i] = cloneObject(oldObject[i]);
}
}
}
return newObject;
}
让我知道你在想什么。
希望这能帮助。
function deepClone(obj) {
/*
* Duplicates an object
*/
var ret = null;
if (obj !== Object(obj)) { // primitive types
return obj;
}
if (obj instanceof String || obj instanceof Number || obj instanceof Boolean) { // string objecs
ret = obj; // for ex: obj = new String("Spidergap")
} else if (obj instanceof Date) { // date
ret = new obj.constructor();
} else
ret = Object.create(obj.constructor.prototype);
var prop = null;
var allProps = Object.getOwnPropertyNames(obj); //gets non enumerables also
var props = {};
for (var i in allProps) {
prop = allProps[i];
props[prop] = false;
}
for (i in obj) {
props[i] = i;
}
//now props contain both enums and non enums
var propDescriptor = null;
var newPropVal = null; // value of the property in new object
for (i in props) {
prop = obj[i];
propDescriptor = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(obj, i);
if (Array.isArray(prop)) { //not backward compatible
prop = prop.slice(); // to copy the array
} else
if (prop instanceof Date == true) {
prop = new prop.constructor();
} else
if (prop instanceof Object == true) {
if (prop instanceof Function == true) { // function
if (!Function.prototype.clone) {
Function.prototype.clone = function() {
var that = this;
var temp = function tmp() {
return that.apply(this, arguments);
};
for (var ky in this) {
temp[ky] = this[ky];
}
return temp;
}
}
prop = prop.clone();
} else // normal object
{
prop = deepClone(prop);
}
}
newPropVal = {
value: prop
};
if (propDescriptor) {
/*
* If property descriptors are there, they must be copied
*/
newPropVal.enumerable = propDescriptor.enumerable;
newPropVal.writable = propDescriptor.writable;
}
if (!ret.hasOwnProperty(i)) // when String or other predefined objects
Object.defineProperty(ret, i, newPropVal); // non enumerable
}
return ret;
}
HTTPS://github.com/jinujd/Javascript-Deep-Clone
我的场景略有不同,我有一個物體,擁有<unk>的物體以及功能,因此,Object.assign() 和 JSON.stringify() 並沒有解決我的問題。
因此,我决定做一个简单的功能,使用内置的方法来复制一个对象,其字面特性,其粘着的对象和功能。
let deepCopy = (target, source) => {
Object.assign(target, source);
// check if there's any nested objects
Object.keys(source).forEach((prop) => {
/**
* assign function copies functions and
* literals (int, strings, etc...)
* except for objects and arrays, so:
*/
if (typeof(source[prop]) === 'object') {
// check if the item is, in fact, an array
if (Array.isArray(source[prop])) {
// clear the copied referenece of nested array
target[prop] = Array();
// iterate array's item and copy over
source[prop].forEach((item, index) => {
// array's items could be objects too!
if (typeof(item) === 'object') {
// clear the copied referenece of nested objects
target[prop][index] = Object();
// and re do the process for nested objects
deepCopy(target[prop][index], item);
} else {
target[prop].push(item);
}
});
// otherwise, treat it as an object
} else {
// clear the copied referenece of nested objects
target[prop] = Object();
// and re do the process for nested objects
deepCopy(target[prop], source[prop]);
}
}
});
};
下面是测试代码:
let a = {
name: 'Human',
func: () => {
console.log('Hi!');
},
prop: {
age: 21,
info: {
hasShirt: true,
hasHat: false
}
},
mark: [89, 92, { exam: [1, 2, 3] }]
};
let b = Object();
deepCopy(b, a);
a.name = 'Alien';
a.func = () => { console.log('Wassup!'); };
a.prop.age = 1024;
a.prop.info.hasShirt = false;
a.mark[0] = 87;
a.mark[1] = 91;
a.mark[2].exam = [4, 5, 6];
console.log(a); // updated props
console.log(b);
对于效率相关的担忧,我认为这是我遇到的问题的最简单和最有效的解决方案,我会欣赏任何关于这个算法的评论,这可能会使它更有效。
我使用npm克隆图书馆,显然它也在浏览器中工作。
https://www.npmjs.com/包装/克隆
let a = clone(b)