什么是最有效的方式来克隆一个JavaScript对象?我已经看到obj = eval(uneval(o));被使用,但它是非标准的,仅支持Firefox.我做了事情,如obj = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(o));但质疑效率。
当前回答
这通常不是最有效的解决方案,但它是我需要的。
function clone(obj, clones) {
// Makes a deep copy of 'obj'. Handles cyclic structures by
// tracking cloned obj's in the 'clones' parameter. Functions
// are included, but not cloned. Functions members are cloned.
var new_obj,
already_cloned,
t = typeof obj,
i = 0,
l,
pair;
clones = clones || [];
if (obj === null) {
return obj;
}
if (t === "object" || t === "function") {
// check to see if we've already cloned obj
for (i = 0, l = clones.length; i < l; i++) {
pair = clones[i];
if (pair[0] === obj) {
already_cloned = pair[1];
break;
}
}
if (already_cloned) {
return already_cloned;
} else {
if (t === "object") { // create new object
new_obj = new obj.constructor();
} else { // Just use functions as is
new_obj = obj;
}
clones.push([obj, new_obj]); // keep track of objects we've cloned
for (key in obj) { // clone object members
if (obj.hasOwnProperty(key)) {
new_obj[key] = clone(obj[key], clones);
}
}
}
}
return new_obj || obj;
}
自行车测试...
a = []
a.push("b", "c", a)
aa = clone(a)
aa === a //=> false
aa[2] === a //=> false
aa[2] === a[2] //=> false
aa[2] === aa //=> true
功能测试...
f = new Function
f.a = a
ff = clone(f)
ff === f //=> true
ff.a === a //=> false
其他回答
代码:
// extends 'from' object with members from 'to'. If 'to' is null, a deep clone of 'from' is returned
function extend(from, to)
{
if (from == null || typeof from != "object") return from;
if (from.constructor != Object && from.constructor != Array) return from;
if (from.constructor == Date || from.constructor == RegExp || from.constructor == Function ||
from.constructor == String || from.constructor == Number || from.constructor == Boolean)
return new from.constructor(from);
to = to || new from.constructor();
for (var name in from)
{
to[name] = typeof to[name] == "undefined" ? extend(from[name], null) : to[name];
}
return to;
}
测试:
var obj =
{
date: new Date(),
func: function(q) { return 1 + q; },
num: 123,
text: "asdasd",
array: [1, "asd"],
regex: new RegExp(/aaa/i),
subobj:
{
num: 234,
text: "asdsaD"
}
}
var clone = extend(obj);
下面是我如何深度克隆一个与ES2015默认值和扩展操作器的对象
const makeDeepCopy = (obj, copy = {}) => {
for (let item in obj) {
if (typeof obj[item] === 'object') {
makeDeepCopy(obj[item], copy)
}
if (obj.hasOwnProperty(item)) {
copy = {
...obj
}
}
}
return copy
}
const testObj = {“类型”:“对象”,“属性”: {“用户Id”: {“类型”:“string”,“机会”:“指南” },“emailAddr”: {“类型”:“string”,“机会”: {“电子邮件”: {“域名”:“fake.com” },“模式”:“+@fake.com” },“需要”: {“用户Id”,“emailAddr” } } const makeDeepCopy = (ob)
我的场景略有不同,我有一個物體,擁有<unk>的物體以及功能,因此,Object.assign() 和 JSON.stringify() 並沒有解決我的問題。
因此,我决定做一个简单的功能,使用内置的方法来复制一个对象,其字面特性,其粘着的对象和功能。
let deepCopy = (target, source) => {
Object.assign(target, source);
// check if there's any nested objects
Object.keys(source).forEach((prop) => {
/**
* assign function copies functions and
* literals (int, strings, etc...)
* except for objects and arrays, so:
*/
if (typeof(source[prop]) === 'object') {
// check if the item is, in fact, an array
if (Array.isArray(source[prop])) {
// clear the copied referenece of nested array
target[prop] = Array();
// iterate array's item and copy over
source[prop].forEach((item, index) => {
// array's items could be objects too!
if (typeof(item) === 'object') {
// clear the copied referenece of nested objects
target[prop][index] = Object();
// and re do the process for nested objects
deepCopy(target[prop][index], item);
} else {
target[prop].push(item);
}
});
// otherwise, treat it as an object
} else {
// clear the copied referenece of nested objects
target[prop] = Object();
// and re do the process for nested objects
deepCopy(target[prop], source[prop]);
}
}
});
};
下面是测试代码:
let a = {
name: 'Human',
func: () => {
console.log('Hi!');
},
prop: {
age: 21,
info: {
hasShirt: true,
hasHat: false
}
},
mark: [89, 92, { exam: [1, 2, 3] }]
};
let b = Object();
deepCopy(b, a);
a.name = 'Alien';
a.func = () => { console.log('Wassup!'); };
a.prop.age = 1024;
a.prop.info.hasShirt = false;
a.mark[0] = 87;
a.mark[1] = 91;
a.mark[2].exam = [4, 5, 6];
console.log(a); // updated props
console.log(b);
对于效率相关的担忧,我认为这是我遇到的问题的最简单和最有效的解决方案,我会欣赏任何关于这个算法的评论,这可能会使它更有效。
因为回归只是太昂贵的JavaScript,我发现的大多数答案是使用回归,而JSON方法将错过非JSON转换部分(功能等)。所以我做了一些研究,并发现这个拖拉机技术避免它。
/*
* Trampoline to avoid recursion in JavaScript, see:
* https://www.integralist.co.uk/posts/functional-recursive-javascript-programming/
*/
function trampoline() {
var func = arguments[0];
var args = [];
for (var i = 1; i < arguments.length; i++) {
args[i - 1] = arguments[i];
}
var currentBatch = func.apply(this, args);
var nextBatch = [];
while (currentBatch && currentBatch.length > 0) {
currentBatch.forEach(function(eachFunc) {
var ret = eachFunc();
if (ret && ret.length > 0) {
nextBatch = nextBatch.concat(ret);
}
});
currentBatch = nextBatch;
nextBatch = [];
}
};
/*
* Deep clone an object using the trampoline technique.
*
* @param target {Object} Object to clone
* @return {Object} Cloned object.
*/
function clone(target) {
if (typeof target !== 'object') {
return target;
}
if (target == null || Object.keys(target).length == 0) {
return target;
}
function _clone(b, a) {
var nextBatch = [];
for (var key in b) {
if (typeof b[key] === 'object' && b[key] !== null) {
if (b[key] instanceof Array) {
a[key] = [];
}
else {
a[key] = {};
}
nextBatch.push(_clone.bind(null, b[key], a[key]));
}
else {
a[key] = b[key];
}
}
return nextBatch;
};
var ret = target instanceof Array ? [] : {};
(trampoline.bind(null, _clone))(target, ret);
return ret;
};
使用 Object.create() 获取原型和支持的例子,并使用 for() 圈获取可列的密钥:
function cloneObject(source) {
var key,value;
var clone = Object.create(source);
for (key in source) {
if (source.hasOwnProperty(key) === true) {
value = source[key];
if (value!==null && typeof value==="object") {
clone[key] = cloneObject(value);
} else {
clone[key] = value;
}
}
}
return clone;
}