如何在整数列表中找到重复项并创建重复项的另一个列表?
当前回答
我们可以使用itertools。Groupby,以便找到所有有dup的项:
from itertools import groupby
myList = [2, 4, 6, 8, 4, 6, 12]
# when the list is sorted, groupby groups by consecutive elements which are similar
for x, y in groupby(sorted(myList)):
# list(y) returns all the occurences of item x
if len(list(y)) > 1:
print x
输出将是:
4
6
其他回答
一句话解决方案:
set([i for i in list if sum([1 for a in list if a == i]) > 1])
试试这个检查副本
>>> def checkDuplicate(List):
duplicate={}
for i in List:
## checking whether the item is already present in dictionary or not
## increasing count if present
## initializing count to 1 if not present
duplicate[i]=duplicate.get(i,0)+1
return [k for k,v in duplicate.items() if v>1]
>>> checkDuplicate([1,2,3,"s",1,2,3])
[1, 2, 3]
为了实现这个问题,我们可以使用多种不同的方法来解决它,这两种是常见的解决方案,但在实际场景中实现它们时,我们还必须考虑时间复杂性。
import random
import time
dupl_list = [random.randint(1,1000) for x in range(500)]
print("List with duplicate integers")
print (dupl_list)
#Method 1
print("******************Method 1 *************")
def Repeat_num(x):
_size = len(x)
repeated = []
for i in range(_size):
# print(i)
k = i + 1
for j in range(k, _size):
# print(j)
if x[i] == x[j] and x[i] not in repeated:
repeated.append(x[i])
return repeated
start = time.time()
print(Repeat_num(dupl_list))
end = time.time()
print("The time of execution of above program is :",(end-start) * 10**3, "ms")
print("***************Method 2****************")
#method 2 - using count()
def repeast_count(dup_list):
new = []
for a in dup_list:
# print(a)
# checking the occurrence of elements
n = dup_list.count(a)
# if the occurrence is more than
# one we add it to the output list
if n > 1:
if new.count(a) == 0: # condition to check
new.append(a)
return new
start = time.time()
print(repeast_count(dupl_list))
end = time.time()
print("The time of execution of above program is :",(end-start) * 10**3, "ms")
# #输出示例:
List with duplicate integers
[5, 45, 28, 81, 32, 98, 8, 83, 47, 95, 41, 49, 4, 1, 85, 26, 38, 82, 54, 11]
******************Method 1 *************
[]
The time of execution of above program is : 1.1069774627685547 ms
***************Method 2****************
[]
The time of execution of above program is : 0.1881122589111328 ms
对于一般的理解,方法1是好的,但是对于真正的实现,我更喜欢方法2,因为它比方法1花费的时间更少。
这里有一个简洁明了的解决方案——
for x in set(li):
li.remove(x)
li = list(set(li))
我没有看到一个纯粹使用迭代器的解决方案,所以我们开始吧
这需要对列表进行排序,这可能是这里的缺点。
a = [1,2,3,2,1,5,6,5,5,5]
a.sort()
set(map(lambda x: x[0], filter(lambda x: x[0] == x[1], zip(a, a[1:]))))
{1, 2, 5}
你可以用这段代码轻松检查你的机器有多快,有一百万潜在的重复:
首先生成数据
import random
from itertools import chain
a = list(chain(*[[n] * random.randint(1, 2) for n in range(1000000)]))
并运行测试:
set(map(lambda x: x[0], filter(lambda x: x[0] == x[1], zip(a, a[1:]))))
不用说,这个解决方案只在列表已经排序的情况下才有效。
推荐文章
- 证书验证失败:无法获得本地颁发者证书
- 当使用pip3安装包时,“Python中的ssl模块不可用”
- 无法切换Python与pyenv
- Python if not == vs if !=
- 如何从scikit-learn决策树中提取决策规则?
- 为什么在Mac OS X v10.9 (Mavericks)的终端中apt-get功能不起作用?
- 将旋转的xtick标签与各自的xtick对齐
- 为什么元组可以包含可变项?
- 如何合并字典的字典?
- 如何创建类属性?
- 不区分大小写的“in”
- 在Python中获取迭代器中的元素个数
- 解析日期字符串并更改格式
- 使用try和。Python中的if
- 如何在Python中获得所有直接子目录