另一个解决方案是;

const isClockwise = (vertices=[]) => {
    const len = vertices.length;
    const sum = vertices.map(({x, y}, index) => {
        let nextIndex = index + 1;
        if (nextIndex === len) nextIndex = 0;

        return {
            x1: x,
            x2: vertices[nextIndex].x,
            y1: x,
            y2: vertices[nextIndex].x
        }
    }).map(({ x1, x2, y1, y2}) => ((x2 - x1) * (y1 + y2))).reduce((a, b) => a + b);

    if (sum > -1) return true;
    if (sum < 0) return false;
}

把所有的顶点作为一个数组;

const vertices = [{x: 5, y: 0}, {x: 6, y: 4}, {x: 4, y: 5}, {x: 1, y: 5}, {x: 1, y: 0}];
isClockwise(vertices);

一些建议的方法在非凸多边形(如新月形)的情况下会失败。这里有一个简单的方法，它可以用于非凸多边形(它甚至可以用于自相交的多边形，如数字8，告诉你它是否主要是顺时针)。

对边求和，(x2−x1)(y2 + y1)如果结果是正的，曲线是顺时针的，如果结果是负的，曲线是逆时针的。(结果是封闭面积的两倍，采用+/-惯例。)

point[0] = (5,0)   edge[0]: (6-5)(4+0) =   4
point[1] = (6,4)   edge[1]: (4-6)(5+4) = -18
point[2] = (4,5)   edge[2]: (1-4)(5+5) = -30
point[3] = (1,5)   edge[3]: (1-1)(0+5) =   0
point[4] = (1,0)   edge[4]: (5-1)(0+0) =   0
                                         ---
                                         -44  counter-clockwise

The cross product measures the degree of perpendicular-ness of two vectors. Imagine that each edge of your polygon is a vector in the x-y plane of a three-dimensional (3-D) xyz space. Then the cross product of two successive edges is a vector in the z-direction, (positive z-direction if the second segment is clockwise, minus z-direction if it's counter-clockwise). The magnitude of this vector is proportional to the sine of the angle between the two original edges, so it reaches a maximum when they are perpendicular, and tapers off to disappear when the edges are collinear (parallel).

因此，对于多边形的每个顶点(点)，计算两条相邻边的叉乘大小:

Using your data:
point[0] = (5, 0)
point[1] = (6, 4)
point[2] = (4, 5)
point[3] = (1, 5)
point[4] = (1, 0)

把边连续地标为 edgeA是从point0到point1的段 点1到点2之间的edgeB .．. edgeE在point4和point0之间。

那么顶点A (point0)在两者之间 edgeE[从点4到点0] 从point0到' point1'

这两条边本身就是向量，它们的x坐标和y坐标可以通过减去它们的起点和终点的坐标来确定:

edgeE = point0 - point4 = (1,0) - (5,0) = (- 4,0) and edgeA = point1 - point0 = (6,4) - (1,0) = (5,4) and

这两个相邻边的外积是用下面矩阵的行列式来计算的，这个矩阵是通过将两个向量的坐标放在表示三个坐标轴的符号(i, j， & k)下面来构造的。第三个(零)值坐标在那里，因为外积概念是一个三维结构，所以我们将这些2-D向量扩展到3-D，以便应用外积:

 i    j    k 
-4    0    0
 1    4    0    

假设所有的叉乘都产生一个垂直于两个向量相乘平面的向量，上面矩阵的行列式只有一个k(或z轴)分量。 计算k轴或z轴分量大小的公式为 A1 *b2 - a2*b1 = -4* 4 - 0* 1 = -16

这个值的大小(-16)是两个原始向量夹角的正弦值，乘以两个向量大小的乘积。 实际上，它值的另一个公式是 A X B(叉乘)= |A| * |B| * sin(AB)。

为了得到角度的大小你需要用这个值(-16)除以两个向量大小的乘积。

|A| * |B| = 4 *根号(17)= 16.4924…

所以sin(AB) = -16 / 16.4924 = -.97014…

这是一个度量顶点后的下一段是否向左或向右弯曲，以及弯曲的程度。不需要取arcsin函数。我们只关心它的大小，当然还有它的符号(正的还是负的)!

对闭合路径周围的其他4个点都这样做，并将每个顶点的计算值相加。

如果最终的和是正的，就顺时针，负的，逆时针。

我的c# / LINQ解决方案是基于下面@charlesbretana的交叉积建议的。你可以为线圈指定一个参考法线。只要曲线大部分在向上向量所定义的平面内，它就可以工作。

using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Numerics;

namespace SolidworksAddinFramework.Geometry
{
    public static class PlanePolygon
    {
        /// <summary>
        /// Assumes that polygon is closed, ie first and last points are the same
        /// </summary>
       public static bool Orientation
           (this IEnumerable<Vector3> polygon, Vector3 up)
        {
            var sum = polygon
                .Buffer(2, 1) // from Interactive Extensions Nuget Pkg
                .Where(b => b.Count == 2)
                .Aggregate
                  ( Vector3.Zero
                  , (p, b) => p + Vector3.Cross(b[0], b[1])
                                  /b[0].Length()/b[1].Length());

            return Vector3.Dot(up, sum) > 0;

        } 

    }
}

使用单元测试

namespace SolidworksAddinFramework.Spec.Geometry
{
    public class PlanePolygonSpec
    {
        [Fact]
        public void OrientationShouldWork()
        {

            var points = Sequences.LinSpace(0, Math.PI*2, 100)
                .Select(t => new Vector3((float) Math.Cos(t), (float) Math.Sin(t), 0))
                .ToList();

            points.Orientation(Vector3.UnitZ).Should().BeTrue();
            points.Reverse();
            points.Orientation(Vector3.UnitZ).Should().BeFalse();



        } 
    }
}

如果使用Matlab，如果多边形顶点按顺时针顺序排列，函数ispolycw将返回true。

c#代码实现lhf的答案:

// https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curve_orientation#Orientation_of_a_simple_polygon
public static WindingOrder DetermineWindingOrder(IList<Vector2> vertices)
{
    int nVerts = vertices.Count;
    // If vertices duplicates first as last to represent closed polygon,
    // skip last.
    Vector2 lastV = vertices[nVerts - 1];
    if (lastV.Equals(vertices[0]))
        nVerts -= 1;
    int iMinVertex = FindCornerVertex(vertices);
    // Orientation matrix:
    //     [ 1  xa  ya ]
    // O = | 1  xb  yb |
    //     [ 1  xc  yc ]
    Vector2 a = vertices[WrapAt(iMinVertex - 1, nVerts)];
    Vector2 b = vertices[iMinVertex];
    Vector2 c = vertices[WrapAt(iMinVertex + 1, nVerts)];
    // determinant(O) = (xb*yc + xa*yb + ya*xc) - (ya*xb + yb*xc + xa*yc)
    double detOrient = (b.X * c.Y + a.X * b.Y + a.Y * c.X) - (a.Y * b.X + b.Y * c.X + a.X * c.Y);

    // TBD: check for "==0", in which case is not defined?
    // Can that happen?  Do we need to check other vertices / eliminate duplicate vertices?
    WindingOrder result = detOrient > 0
            ? WindingOrder.Clockwise
            : WindingOrder.CounterClockwise;
    return result;
}

public enum WindingOrder
{
    Clockwise,
    CounterClockwise
}

// Find vertex along one edge of bounding box.
// In this case, we find smallest y; in case of tie also smallest x.
private static int FindCornerVertex(IList<Vector2> vertices)
{
    int iMinVertex = -1;
    float minY = float.MaxValue;
    float minXAtMinY = float.MaxValue;
    for (int i = 0; i < vertices.Count; i++)
    {
        Vector2 vert = vertices[i];
        float y = vert.Y;
        if (y > minY)
            continue;
        if (y == minY)
            if (vert.X >= minXAtMinY)
                continue;

        // Minimum so far.
        iMinVertex = i;
        minY = y;
        minXAtMinY = vert.X;
    }

    return iMinVertex;
}

// Return value in (0..n-1).
// Works for i in (-n..+infinity).
// If need to allow more negative values, need more complex formula.
private static int WrapAt(int i, int n)
{
    // "+n": Moves (-n..) up to (0..).
    return (i + n) % n;
}