比如，我有一个脚本，用这行代码调用：
./myscript -vfd ./foo/bar/someFile -o /fizz/someOtherFile
或者这个：
./myscript -v -f -d -o /fizz/someOtherFile ./foo/bar/someFile
什么是公认的解析方式，以便在每种情况下（或两者的某种组合）$v、$f和$d都将设置为true，而$outFile将等于/fiz/someOtherFile？
当前回答
我写了一个脚本，可以帮助轻松解析命令行参数https://github.com/unfor19/bargs
示例
$ bash example.sh -n Willy --gender male -a 99
Name: Willy
Age: 99
Gender: male
Location: chocolate-factory
$ bash example.sh -n Meir --gender male
[ERROR] Required argument: age
Usage: bash example.sh -n Willy --gender male -a 99
--person_name | -n [Willy] What is your name?
--age | -a [Required]
--gender | -g [Required]
--location | -l [chocolate-factory] insert your location
$ bash example.sh -h
Usage: bash example.sh -n Willy --gender male -a 99
--person_name | -n [Willy] What is your name?
--age | -a [Required]
--gender | -g [Required]
--location | -l [chocolate-factory] insert your location
其他回答
有几种方法可以解析cmdline参数（例如GNU getopt（不可移植）vs BSD（MacOS）getopt vs getopts）-所有这些都有问题。此解决方案
是便携式的！没有依赖关系，仅依赖于bash内置允许短期和长期选项处理空格或同时在选项和参数之间使用=分隔符支持串联短选项样式-vxfhandles选项和可选参数（例如--color vs--color=always），正确检测和报告未知选项支持--表示选项结束，以及与相同功能集的替代方案相比，不需要代码膨胀。即简洁，因此易于维护
示例：任何
# flag
-f
--foo
# option with required argument
-b"Hello World"
-b "Hello World"
--bar "Hello World"
--bar="Hello World"
# option with optional argument
--baz
--baz="Optional Hello"
#!/usr/bin/env bash
usage() {
cat - >&2 <<EOF
NAME
program-name.sh - Brief description
SYNOPSIS
program-name.sh [-h|--help]
program-name.sh [-f|--foo]
[-b|--bar <arg>]
[--baz[=<arg>]]
[--]
FILE ...
REQUIRED ARGUMENTS
FILE ...
input files
OPTIONS
-h, --help
Prints this and exits
-f, --foo
A flag option
-b, --bar <arg>
Option requiring an argument <arg>
--baz[=<arg>]
Option that has an optional argument <arg>. If <arg>
is not specified, defaults to 'DEFAULT'
--
Specify end of options; useful if the first non option
argument starts with a hyphen
EOF
}
fatal() {
for i; do
echo -e "${i}" >&2
done
exit 1
}
# For long option processing
next_arg() {
if [[ $OPTARG == *=* ]]; then
# for cases like '--opt=arg'
OPTARG="${OPTARG#*=}"
else
# for cases like '--opt arg'
OPTARG="${args[$OPTIND]}"
OPTIND=$((OPTIND + 1))
fi
}
# ':' means preceding option character expects one argument, except
# first ':' which make getopts run in silent mode. We handle errors with
# wildcard case catch. Long options are considered as the '-' character
optspec=":hfb:-:"
args=("" "$@") # dummy first element so $1 and $args[1] are aligned
while getopts "$optspec" optchar; do
case "$optchar" in
h) usage; exit 0 ;;
f) foo=1 ;;
b) bar="$OPTARG" ;;
-) # long option processing
case "$OPTARG" in
help)
usage; exit 0 ;;
foo)
foo=1 ;;
bar|bar=*) next_arg
bar="$OPTARG" ;;
baz)
baz=DEFAULT ;;
baz=*) next_arg
baz="$OPTARG" ;;
-) break ;;
*) fatal "Unknown option '--${OPTARG}'" "see '${0} --help' for usage" ;;
esac
;;
*) fatal "Unknown option: '-${OPTARG}'" "See '${0} --help' for usage" ;;
esac
done
shift $((OPTIND-1))
if [ "$#" -eq 0 ]; then
fatal "Expected at least one required argument FILE" \
"See '${0} --help' for usage"
fi
echo "foo=$foo, bar=$bar, baz=$baz, files=${@}"
当我尝试这个问题时，上面的答案似乎有点bug——这是我发现更强大的解决方案：
boolean_arg=""
arg_with_value=""
while [[ $# -gt 0 ]]
do
key="$1"
case $key in
-b|--boolean-arg)
boolean_arg=true
shift
;;
-a|--arg-with-value)
arg_with_value="$2"
shift
shift
;;
-*)
echo "Unknown option: $1"
exit 1
;;
*)
arg_num=$(( $arg_num + 1 ))
case $arg_num in
1)
first_normal_arg="$1"
shift
;;
2)
second_normal_arg="$1"
shift
;;
*)
bad_args=TRUE
esac
;;
esac
done
# Handy to have this here when adding arguments to
# see if they're working. Just edit the '0' to be '1'.
if [[ 0 == 1 ]]; then
echo "first_normal_arg: $first_normal_arg"
echo "second_normal_arg: $second_normal_arg"
echo "boolean_arg: $boolean_arg"
echo "arg_with_value: $arg_with_value"
exit 0
fi
if [[ $bad_args == TRUE || $arg_num < 2 ]]; then
echo "Usage: $(basename "$0") <first-normal-arg> <second-normal-arg> [--boolean-arg] [--arg-with-value VALUE]"
exit 1
fi
我写了一个脚本，可以帮助轻松解析命令行参数https://github.com/unfor19/bargs
示例
$ bash example.sh -n Willy --gender male -a 99
Name: Willy
Age: 99
Gender: male
Location: chocolate-factory
$ bash example.sh -n Meir --gender male
[ERROR] Required argument: age
Usage: bash example.sh -n Willy --gender male -a 99
--person_name | -n [Willy] What is your name?
--age | -a [Required]
--gender | -g [Required]
--location | -l [chocolate-factory] insert your location
$ bash example.sh -h
Usage: bash example.sh -n Willy --gender male -a 99
--person_name | -n [Willy] What is your name?
--age | -a [Required]
--gender | -g [Required]
--location | -l [chocolate-factory] insert your location
保留未处理参数的解决方案。包括演示。
这是我的解决方案。它非常灵活，不像其他软件包，不需要外部包，并且可以干净地处理遗留的参数。
用法为：/myscript-flag flag变量-otherflag flagvar2
您所要做的就是编辑有效标记行。它在前面加上连字符并搜索所有参数。然后它将下一个参数定义为标志名，例如。
./myscript -flag flagvariable -otherflag flagvar2
echo $flag $otherflag
flagvariable flagvar2
主要代码（简短的版本，详细的示例，以及错误输出的版本）：
#!/usr/bin/env bash
#shebang.io
validflags="rate time number"
count=1
for arg in $@
do
match=0
argval=$1
for flag in $validflags
do
sflag="-"$flag
if [ "$argval" == "$sflag" ]
then
declare $flag=$2
match=1
fi
done
if [ "$match" == "1" ]
then
shift 2
else
leftovers=$(echo $leftovers $argval)
shift
fi
count=$(($count+1))
done
#Cleanup then restore the leftovers
shift $#
set -- $leftovers
带有内置echo演示的详细版本：
#!/usr/bin/env bash
#shebang.io
rate=30
time=30
number=30
echo "all args
$@"
validflags="rate time number"
count=1
for arg in $@
do
match=0
argval=$1
# argval=$(echo $@ | cut -d ' ' -f$count)
for flag in $validflags
do
sflag="-"$flag
if [ "$argval" == "$sflag" ]
then
declare $flag=$2
match=1
fi
done
if [ "$match" == "1" ]
then
shift 2
else
leftovers=$(echo $leftovers $argval)
shift
fi
count=$(($count+1))
done
#Cleanup then restore the leftovers
echo "pre final clear args:
$@"
shift $#
echo "post final clear args:
$@"
set -- $leftovers
echo "all post set args:
$@"
echo arg1: $1 arg2: $2
echo leftovers: $leftovers
echo rate $rate time $time number $number
最后一个，如果传递了一个无效的参数，这一个会出错。
#!/usr/bin/env bash
#shebang.io
rate=30
time=30
number=30
validflags="rate time number"
count=1
for arg in $@
do
argval=$1
match=0
if [ "${argval:0:1}" == "-" ]
then
for flag in $validflags
do
sflag="-"$flag
if [ "$argval" == "$sflag" ]
then
declare $flag=$2
match=1
fi
done
if [ "$match" == "0" ]
then
echo "Bad argument: $argval"
exit 1
fi
shift 2
else
leftovers=$(echo $leftovers $argval)
shift
fi
count=$(($count+1))
done
#Cleanup then restore the leftovers
shift $#
set -- $leftovers
echo rate $rate time $time number $number
echo leftovers: $leftovers
优点：不管怎么说，它处理得很好。它保留了许多其他解决方案所没有的未使用的参数。它还允许调用变量，而无需在脚本中手动定义。如果没有给出相应的参数，它还允许预填充变量。（请参阅详细示例）。
缺点：无法解析单个复杂的arg字符串，例如-xcvf将作为单个参数处理。不过，您可以很容易地在我的代码中编写额外的代码，以添加此功能。
我想提交我的项目：https://github.com/flyingangel/argparser
source argparser.sh
parse_args "$@"
就这么简单。环境将填充与参数同名的变量
